What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

LSSU Laker Hockey 2012-2013, Part 2

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: LSSU Laker Hockey 2012-2013, Part 2

Bill, I tried to reply twice before this afternoon, but the post left my computer screen before I was ready to send it - I'll try again.

It wasn't me that posted about a "middleman" who tried to guide student/athletes to a D1 program for the middleman's benefit - I would NEVER do that. However, I have served as a neutral third party to connect
a prospect with a D1 school who was interested in him before the school could contact them to avoid an NCAA violation. (It's OK for a student/athlete to contact a program before it's legal for the program to
contact the player).

I also serve as a "bird dog" for numerous D1 & D111 programs to provide an independent scouting report of HS or Junior prospects. I respond to specific requests from individual coaches or provide unsolicited
inputs for players I watch. I scout teams at tournament or playoffs, watching for players wh catch my eye. I like to watch a game when I know nothing about the players on either team. I worked for USA Hockey for a number of years before the Development Program was established. I watched eastern prep school tournaments when my son attended Kimball Union Academy. I actally started scouting back when my oldest son played for Compuware and plaed at the Octoberfest in Kitchner. The first player I everscouted was #2 on the London Squirt Major AAA team - Eric Lindros (not a bad way to start). I saw him later in that season in Ottawa when his parents had movedto Toronto and eric played for the Toronto Marlies. I have a box full of programs from every tournament my two sons played in including several International events that yougest so, Matt, played in. I used the same rating system from the early days and it fun to look back and see some of the names that later showed up inthe NHL team. It's also interesting to see the very top players I scouted who I never heard anyting about again. I found out that I batted about .500 in predicting future success, especially in the younger players who might have been big for their age or later shied away from physical play.

Getting back to assisting in the recruiting process, I have learned that many/most recruiters have no problem of evslusting a players skill set, but seldom have enough information about what's in their mind and especially in their heart. The example I use is Brian Rafalski. He's a 1973 like my older son and I don't remember ever seeing him at a Compuware tryout in his younger days. He played for teams like the Michigan Nationals AAA teams and even back then,wasn't usually the #1 D-man on his team. There were easily a dozen AAAD-men above him just in the state of Michigan. Nobody could predict just how dedicated he was and how long he would hand in there waiting for someone to "discover" him. Lou Lamirello (sp?) NJ Devils GM did that when he was scouting a forward on a team Rafalski'swas playing in Europe. When he returned to NJ and proudly told his scouting staff that he had found the best free agent D-man in the works, they chuckled an told him that they had been telling him that for years and Lou told them he was too small. We all know that he went on to be paired with Scott Stevens with the Devils and then Nick Lidstrom with the Wings.......not bad company, eh?
 
Re: LSSU Laker Hockey 2012-2013, Part 2

Bill, I tried to reply twice before this afternoon, but the post left my computer screen before I was ready to send it - I'll try again.

It wasn't me that posted about a "middleman" who tried to guide student/athletes to a D1 program for the middleman's benefit - I would NEVER do that. However, I have served as a neutral third party to connect
a prospect with a D1 school who was interested in him before the school could contact them to avoid an NCAA violation. (It's OK for a student/athlete to contact a program before it's legal for the program to
contact the player).

I also serve as a "bird dog" for numerous D1 & D111 programs to provide an independent scouting report of HS or Junior prospects. I respond to specific requests from individual coaches or provide unsolicited
inputs for players I watch. I scout teams at tournament or playoffs, watching for players wh catch my eye. I like to watch a game when I know nothing about the players on either team. I worked for USA Hockey for a number of years before the Development Program was established. I watched eastern prep school tournaments when my son attended Kimball Union Academy. I actally started scouting back when my oldest son played for Compuware and plaed at the Octoberfest in Kitchner. The first player I everscouted was #2 on the London Squirt Major AAA team - Eric Lindros (not a bad way to start). I saw him later in that season in Ottawa when his parents had movedto Toronto and eric played for the Toronto Marlies. I have a box full of programs from every tournament my two sons played in including several International events that yougest so, Matt, played in. I used the same rating system from the early days and it fun to look back and see some of the names that later showed up inthe NHL team. It's also interesting to see the very top players I scouted who I never heard anyting about again. I found out that I batted about .500 in predicting future success, especially in the younger players who might have been big for their age or later shied away from physical play.

Getting back to assisting in the recruiting process, I have learned that many/most recruiters have no problem of evslusting a players skill set, but seldom have enough information about what's in their mind and especially in their heart. The example I use is Brian Rafalski. He's a 1973 like my older son and I don't remember ever seeing him at a Compuware tryout in his younger days. He played for teams like the Michigan Nationals AAA teams and even back then,wasn't usually the #1 D-man on his team. There were easily a dozen AAAD-men above him just in the state of Michigan. Nobody could predict just how dedicated he was and how long he would hand in there waiting for someone to "discover" him. Lou Lamirello (sp?) NJ Devils GM did that when he was scouting a forward on a team Rafalski'swas playing in Europe. When he returned to NJ and proudly told his scouting staff that he had found the best free agent D-man in the works, they chuckled an told him that they had been telling him that for years and Lou told them he was too small. We all know that he went on to be paired with Scott Stevens with the Devils and then Nick Lidstrom with the Wings.......not bad company, eh?
Thanks for the info FRICKER. I didn't word my question as well as I could have. I didn't mean to imply that "middlemen" or "neutral third parties" were doing so for their own personal gain, but that perhaps they were doing it for a particular school because they liked that school or had some connections to it.
 
Re: LSSU Laker Hockey 2012-2013, Part 2

Getting back to assisting in the recruiting process, I have learned that many/most recruiters have no problem of evslusting a players skill set, but seldom have enough information about what's in their mind and especially in their heart. The example I use is Brian Rafalski. He's a 1973 like my older son and I don't remember ever seeing him at a Compuware tryout in his younger days. He played for teams like the Michigan Nationals AAA teams and even back then,wasn't usually the #1 D-man on his team. There were easily a dozen AAAD-men above him just in the state of Michigan. Nobody could predict just how dedicated he was and how long he would hand in there waiting for someone to "discover" him. Lou Lamirello (sp?) NJ Devils GM did that when he was scouting a forward on a team Rafalski'swas playing in Europe. When he returned to NJ and proudly told his scouting staff that he had found the best free agent D-man in the works, they chuckled an told him that they had been telling him that for years and Lou told them he was too small. We all know that he went on to be paired with Scott Stevens with the Devils and then Nick Lidstrom with the Wings.......not bad company, eh?

love the rafalski story.
cheers from falcon country.
 
Re: LSSU Laker Hockey 2012-2013, Part 2

Bill, I don't deny differentiating my level of respect for one school over the other, and I also had stronger relationships one place over another. Looking back, for some reason, I had as much or more success in making the "fit" for student/athletes where I didn't have any previous connections..............go figger!
 
Re: LSSU Laker Hockey 2012-2013, Part 2

lakers got lucky that Northern didn't sweep Ferris and from what I heard from people who were at that game,Northern could have won Friday as well .
 
Re: LSSU Laker Hockey 2012-2013, Part 2

If the Lakers didn't work things out over this bye weekend I predict they will be going to either Northern or Bowling Green for the first round.

Personally I think if the bye hadn't come when it did they would have had a tough time winning another game. So we shall see.
 
Re: LSSU Laker Hockey 2012-2013, Part 2

lakers got lucky that Northern didn't sweep Ferris and from what I heard from people who were at that game,Northern could have won Friday as well .

Lakers are lucky Notre Dame swept Michigan as well.

I predict the Lakers will play scUM in the first round.
 
Re: LSSU Laker Hockey 2012-2013, Part 2

Maybe I'm a simple sort, but knocking off Michigan in the first round would be so nice.

This season still has plenty of life in it. The bye did, indeed, come at the right time. This team was really struggling. It happens. You just can't seem to get a bounce. Every 50/50 puck goes the wrong way; every 50/50 decision turns out bad. Sometimes the hockey gods can be cruel that way.

But there are still some great games to play.

And I am going to say what every hockey-fan, coach, reporter, and player has said, every year, for generations: With a hot goalie and good defense, anything can happen in the Playoffs.

So with that said, I am not quite ready to abandon the bandwagon upon which I sat so happily this previous Fall. I am certainly not pleased with the recent results. But this group has proven to be a funny and very resiliant collection of players, many of them veterans of many years in juniors and in the NCAA. If they can find their defensive spark, and some injuries heal up nicely, LSSU could be a tough playoff pill for some teams to swallow. Lets hope we get a chance to destroy Michigan at home in the Playoffs.
 
Re: LSSU Laker Hockey 2012-2013, Part 2

Maybe I'm a simple sort, but knocking off Michigan in the first round would be so nice.

This season still has plenty of life in it. The bye did, indeed, come at the right time. This team was really struggling. It happens. You just can't seem to get a bounce. Every 50/50 puck goes the wrong way; every 50/50 decision turns out bad. Sometimes the hockey gods can be cruel that way.

But there are still some great games to play.

And I am going to say what every hockey-fan, coach, reporter, and player has said, every year, for generations: With a hot goalie and good defense, anything can happen in the Playoffs.

So with that said, I am not quite ready to abandon the bandwagon upon which I sat so happily this previous Fall. I am certainly not pleased with the recent results. But this group has proven to be a funny and very resiliant collection of players, many of them veterans of many years in juniors and in the NCAA. If they can find their defensive spark, and some injuries heal up nicely, LSSU could be a tough playoff pill for some teams to swallow. Lets hope we get a chance to destroy Michigan at home in the Playoffs.
Goaltending and defense, which are supposed to be the strengths of the team, certainly have to improve if the team hopes to make any noise in the playoffs and/or finish up the regular season strong. Campbell is supposed to be back playing this weekend, although it's hard to say how effective he may be, not having played yet this season. I'm not predicting any great things for the finish. The team has to show me what it can do.
 
Re: LSSU Laker Hockey 2012-2013, Part 2

Lakers MUST sweep this weekend considering the next two weekends after this will be a bit tougher. Sure hope Campbell returns as well. Also it should be interesting how much the Soo Eagles will take away from the attendance since they also play this weekend.
 
Maybe I'm a simple sort, but knocking off Michigan in the first round would be so nice.

This season still has plenty of life in it. The bye did, indeed, come at the right time. This team was really struggling. It happens. You just can't seem to get a bounce. Every 50/50 puck goes the wrong way; every 50/50 decision turns out bad. Sometimes the hockey gods can be cruel that way.

But there are still some great games to play.

And I am going to say what every hockey-fan, coach, reporter, and player has said, every year, for generations: With a hot goalie and good defense, anything can happen in the Playoffs.

So with that said, I am not quite ready to abandon the bandwagon upon which I sat so happily this previous Fall. I am certainly not pleased with the recent results. But this group has proven to be a funny and very resiliant collection of players, many of them veterans of many years in juniors and in the NCAA. If they can find their defensive spark, and some injuries heal up nicely, LSSU could be a tough playoff pill for some teams to swallow. Lets hope we get a chance to destroy Michigan at home in the Playoffs.



My last post may have sounded bleak but I am a Laker fan win lose or stupid shootout.
I think even more important then getting healthy is the team has had two weeks to do a little soul searching to wright the mast to get this ship back on course. Defense and goaltending is indeed the team strengths if they found that, they could be a difficult team to play in the playoffs.
 
Re: LSSU Laker Hockey 2012-2013, Part 2

The problem for Lake State is that Alaska,Miami,and Northern are all playing better hockey than the Lakers are and that makes winning even more difficult.
 
Re: LSSU Laker Hockey 2012-2013, Part 2

Next season in the WCHA ,only 8 0f the 10 teams make the playoffs . How will it look if the Lakers don't make it and with how they are all over the board on how they play,that could happen.
 
Re: LSSU Laker Hockey 2012-2013, Part 2

I'm planning on making the trip up to the Soo tomorrow for the Alaska series. It sounds like Campbell is finally ready to play, at least a little, and I do want to see him play, even though he won't be in full game shape yet. I'm hoping the Lakers won't disappoint me too much.
 
Re: LSSU Laker Hockey 2012-2013, Part 2

On another note, does anyone know why the first segment of this week's Inside Laker Hockey podcast is missing?
 
Re: LSSU Laker Hockey 2012-2013, Part 2

Well finally we got some offense. Still, the difference in the game was the goalies. The Alaska goalie didn't play particularly well whereas Murdoch played very well with the exception of the one goal he did give up. It was a breakaway so it's hard to fault him much; it was the 1st Alaska shot on net and Murdoch never really reacted much to the shot; he got deked out and kind of froze. But after that, he was very solid in net. Some of the Laker goals were just good shots and well placed, but the Alaska goalie just never looked like he was on his game.

Power play was awful. They gave up the shorthanded goal on their 1st pp. Almost gave up another breakaway on the 2nd pp. Two of their other ones lasted around 15-20 seconds before taking their own penalties. On another one, they gave up a 2 on 1 to Alaska. Not enough movement and passing wasn't crisp.

I thought Alaska outplayed the Lakers the 1st half of the game. They were much more aggressive and generated a lot more sorting chances. Lakers played sloppy defensively, especially early on. Last half of the game, the play was fairly even with each team getting some chances. Murdoch was the difference. Lakers are still giving up too many shots on net, indicative of not playing well enough defensively.

But we won 5-1, and that's what counts. Getting the quick 2-0 lead was huge for the Lakers.
 
Well finally we got some offense. Still, the difference in the game was the goalies. The Alaska goalie didn't play particularly well whereas Murdoch played very well with the exception of the one goal he did give up. It was a breakaway so it's hard to fault him much; it was the 1st Alaska shot on net and Murdoch never really reacted much to the shot; he got deked out and kind of froze. But after that, he was very solid in net. Some of the Laker goals were just good shots and well placed, but the Alaska goalie just never looked like he was on his game.

Power play was awful. They gave up the shorthanded goal on their 1st pp. Almost gave up another breakaway on the 2nd pp. Two of their other ones lasted around 15-20 seconds before taking their own penalties. On another one, they gave up a 2 on 1 to Alaska. Not enough movement and passing wasn't crisp.

I thought Alaska outplayed the Lakers the 1st half of the game. They were much more aggressive and generated a lot more sorting chances. Lakers played sloppy defensively, especially early on. Last half of the game, the play was fairly even with each team getting some chances. Murdoch was the difference. Lakers are still giving up too many shots on net, indicative of not playing well enough defensively.

But we won 5-1, and that's what counts. Getting the quick 2-0 lead was huge for the Lakers.


How can you possibly say that was a weak goal by Murdock, the Alaska player made a great move, held off until he got him down and put puck into the top shelf over his blocker with a backhand
from about 3 feet out of the crease.

It was a bad turn over for sure, but it was a great move.
 
Last edited:
How can you possibly say that was a weak goal by Murdock, the Alaska player made a great move, held off until he got him down and put puck into the top shelf over his blocker with a backhand
from about 3 feet out of the crease.

It was a bad turn over for sure, but it was a great move.
It wasn't so much that it was a weak goal (one you would expect him to usually save) as much as it looked to me from my angle that Murdock played it a little passively. It was early and he didn't look warmed up to the game yet. Taking nothing way from the Alaska player; it was a great move. As I said earlier,I think Murdock played solid overall and was the difference in the game.
 
Re: LSSU Laker Hockey 2012-2013, Part 2

Shots were 47-31 favoring Alaska- anybody got a guesstimateof what "quality shots" were? The teams were 0 for 13 on the PP - improvement neededallaround.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top