The 6-0 prediction is just a gut feeling I have. I hope it's a bigger blowout.Yeah right. Feel free to chime in again when you're not high.
The 6-0 prediction is just a gut feeling I have. I hope it's a bigger blowout.Yeah right. Feel free to chime in again when you're not high.
The 6-0 prediction is just a gut feeling I have. I hope it's a bigger blowout.
You should? Really?!?!? Based on what, the general consensus entering the season that Lowell was a good team? Certainly nothing has happened during the season, good for Lowell or bad for UVM, to support your conclusion. In fact, if you look at things like stats, games played, schedule, and the fact that UVM will be the home team for this series, one can make a pretty good case that we "should" win both games.UML should win both.
Well that'll make things a lot more interesting.Markison and Brickley will be back in the lineup on Friday night!
http://www.burlingtonfreepress.com/...2/RSS03?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
I've stayed out of the trash talk, but I'd be curious to know which numbers show that UVM "should" win both games?In fact, if you look at things like stats, games played, schedule, and the fact that UVM will be the home team for this series, one can make a pretty good case that we "should" win both games.
I don't have the time or inclination to research this, but we've been pretty solid in recent games (last 6 or 7), including a convincing win against the number 12 or 13 team in the country. Our bad losses have come against top teams (Minnesota, UNH, BU) and we've been very competitive in most every other loss, including the other game against Minnesota and a loss to Dartmouth in which we had the better of the play. You guys have also been solid recently, but some of those wins have come against weak teams (Bentley & Clarkson). Moreover, regardless of records, I think it's always an advantage to be playing at home. I wasn't trying to start a flame fest (and I'm still not)--my point was merely that I don't think it's as much a certainty that Lowell will win both games as the poster seemed to suggest. You may well win both game, but I don't think there's reason to think you "should" win both games.I've stayed out of the trash talk, but I'd be curious to know which numbers show that UVM "should" win both games?
Lowell's got a better GF, GA, tougher SOS, and better PK than Vermont. UVM has a better PP. Lowell has the same number of wins in HE play (in 3 less games) than UVM, and five of the six losses for Lowell in HE play are against the #1 and #2 teams (pretty pathetic losses in most cases). Vermont is 4-5 at home and Lowell is 5-3 on the road.
Funny the article didn't mention what Markison's injury was. A couple of weeks ago, someone in our thread said they thought it was a back injury. Why the big secret?Markison and Brickley will be back in the lineup on Friday night!
http://www.burlingtonfreepress.com/...2/RSS03?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
Funny the article didn't mention what Markison's injury was. A couple of weeks ago, someone in our thread said they thought it was a back injury. Why the big secret?
I don't have the time or inclination to research this, but we've been pretty solid in recent games (last 6 or 7), including a convincing win against the number 12 or 13 team in the country. Our bad losses have come against top teams (Minnesota, UNH, BU) and we've been very competitive in most every other loss, including the other game against Minnesota and a loss to Dartmouth in which we had the better of the play. You guys have also been solid recently, but some of those wins have come against weak teams (Bentley & Clarkson). Moreover, regardless of records, I think it's always an advantage to be playing at home. I wasn't trying to start a flame fest (and I'm still not)--my point was merely that I don't think it's as much a certainty that Lowell will win both games as the poster seemed to suggest. You may well win both game, but I don't think there's reason to think you "should" win both games.
Predicting a sweep by any team in any series is always a crap shoot. If I'm predicting with my head, I think Lowell and Vermont skate to a 2-2 tie on Friday, and the River Hawks take out the 'Cats on Saturday, say 4-1 with an ENG. If I'm predicting with my gut, I think Lowell wins 6-2 on Friday and Vermont forfeits the game on Saturday, the players so terrified at the proposition of facing another shift against Ruhwedel that they mutiny. Can't blame them.
Good post. Right now, I feel like there are 3 teams in HE that should beat us (BC, BU & UNH). Although the others may have an edge on us in certain statistical categories or other metrics used to predict success (or us on them), I really believe those games are up for grabs. Maybe I'll add Lowell to the list of 3 after this weekend, but as I said earlier in the thread, I see this one as a split.Lowell has 7 losses on the season. 6 of those loses came to teams currently ranked #3, #4 and #9 in the country. So if who you lost to suddenly matters for spit (and hint: it doesn't), Lowell has had the tougher schedule of the two by far. But since Vermont fans rarely take my word for anything, let's look at the PWR SOS rankings:
Lowell: 8th
Vermont: 25th
So why should Lowell win both games? They're more talented. Across the board, from net to starting defense to the top 6 forwards, Lowell has more talent. And I don't think it's really close. I'm sure you do, and that's your right, of course. Everyone is entitled to their opinion. Even if it's wrong.
Predicting a sweep by any team in any series is always a crap shoot. If I'm predicting with my head, I think Lowell and Vermont skate to a 2-2 tie on Friday, and the River Hawks take out the 'Cats on Saturday, say 4-1 with an ENG. If I'm predicting with my gut, I think Lowell wins 6-2 on Friday and Vermont forfeits the game on Saturday, the players so terrified at the proposition of facing another shift against Ruhwedel that they mutiny. Can't blame them.
I agree with the rest of your post, but this line makes no sense. I was thoroughly disappointed in that first game, and yes, it felt like a loss. But in any one game, especially in hockey, a goalie can win/lose a game for you. Hoffman played very well, and the chances that were out there, Lowell just didn't take. You can't really use one game to help prove your theory on a team.And that still doesnt explain how such a great team that was supposed to be so good couldnt beat a VT team that wasnt supposed to be good and lost so much in the off season.
Does Vegas hold odd on this?If I'm predicting with my gut, I think Lowell wins 6-2 on Friday and Vermont forfeits the game on Saturday, the players so terrified at the proposition of facing another shift against Ruhwedel that they mutiny. Can't blame them.
Bet he disagrees with you on thisYou can't really use one game to help prove your theory on a team.
Two easy wins for Lowell this weekend. I'm thinking Lowell wins 4-2 Friday and 6-0 Saturday.
We're halfway there!
So umm...?I see anything less the 4 pts for UVM as inexcusable.