Re: Just what IS "marriage" anyway?
unofan is my ignore list, so I don't know or respond to anything he posts.
unofan is my ignore list, so I don't know or respond to anything he posts.
Roots of an individual's belief system can come from anywhere, ranging from 100% relgious, to 100% non-religious. Roots of a secular society's collective belief system need to be from a source that agrees with as many people as possible in that society. I really don't think any sane person has a problem with a law against murder, but how is that comparable at all to gay marriage? Just because the bible, or numerous other religious texts, got the murder thing right, we should follow them for everything?Probably because people mistaken the difference between religion and spirituality. This is one of the lessons taught during the South Park two-parter "Do the Handicapped Go to Hell?"/"Probably" (Synopsis: Cartman turns into the equivalent of a preachy Southern Baptist minister). People are turning away from religious beliefs because they associate it with sitting/standing/kneeling in a building/carpet/whatever at a certain frequency and then taking a number of tomes literally that you have to do or not do certain things in order to go somewhere when you die. For some people, that's a sense of direction, and can easily be respected. What I find spiritual people do is that they take the teachings of religions and shape it into what they believe constitutes a good person, and typically allows for people to have the freedom to express themselves in the way that they do. The definition of "good person" does have to have roots somewhere, and I do believe it evolves over time. Who knows, thousand of years from now humans may become cannibals.
unofan is my ignore list, so I don't know or respond to anything he posts.
Well said.In general, if something in someone's life makes them a better person (ie, religion, philosophy, rooting for any team other than the Rodents, Roboshark), I'm all for it.
If it makes you a miserable jerk, you were going to do that regardless of religion or lack there of.
unofan is my ignore list, so I don't know or respond to anything he posts.
and yet now that he saw it, he still didn't answer...I for one am shocked.
So you'd be fine if we instituted some sharia law?Again, people are now ok with human understanding coming from anywhere but religion. Somehow the possibility that religion could inform us in any way is just beyond the pale of possibility to many people. Surely a bizarre state of affairs, but that's where our nation finds itself. But, as history shows, every great nation eventually decays and falls.
You can have that conversation with unofan if you want. I'm not interested. Though I'd say some of the things he's put forward in some ways remind me of sharia law in their lack of tolerance and respect for others.Let me try.
So you'd be fine if we instituted some sharia law?
Again I think of Matthew where tells the Sadducees and the Pharisees that they are way too obsessed with the letter of the law and not the Spirit. Nations fall because of laxity but also because they are inflexible. Neither system works well.Again, people are now ok with human understanding coming from anywhere but religion. Somehow the possibility that religion could inform us in any way is just beyond the pale of possibility to many people. Surely a bizarre state of affairs, but that's where our nation finds itself. But, as history shows, every great nation eventually decays and falls.
You can have that conversation with unofan if you want. I'm not interested. Though I'd say some of the things he's put forward in some ways remind me of sharia law in their lack of tolerance and respect for others.
You see, some of us can see middle ground between religion not in any way informing anything in society and sharia law. Apparently unofan and others can't see anything in between. Doesn't surprise me, given past things I've seen said around here.
You can have that conversation with unofan if you want. I'm not interested. Though I'd say some of the things he's put forward in some ways remind me of sharia law in their lack of tolerance and respect for others.
You see, some of us can see middle ground between religion not in any way informing anything in society and sharia law. Apparently unofan and others can't see anything in between. Doesn't surprise me, given past things I've seen said around here.
Grey area is only good if it fits your agenda. Everyone is guilty of that.
Especially Bob...but to be fair life sucks when you are nailed to a cross
Can you imagine the hissy fit Bob would throw if someone from a religion unlike his said the same things he did? Remember only Jesus was right...he was also white and had a six pack and healed dinosaurs!!![]()
Lots of things legitimately fall into grey areas. That's just the way life is.Grey area is only good if it fits your agenda. Everyone is guilty of that.
what have you got against healing dinosaurs? Colepiocephale hater!Especially Bob...but to be fair life sucks when you are nailed to a cross
Can you imagine the hissy fit Bob would throw if someone from a religion unlike his said the same things he did? Remember only Jesus was right...he was also white and had a six pack and healed dinosaurs!!![]()
Just liberals changing the subject. This (queer hitchins) is one of the very few issues that I actually agree with them on, and it makes me feel extremely dirty. I don't want to be associated with the libs in any way. My way out is, I think it is a fairly conservative concept to allow gays to marry, the government shouldn't be intruding on their lives either, and should be as small as possible.Suddenly everybody is fixated on dinosaurs. Well, in that spirit, when I was a kid I always thought the diplodocus had a cool name.