Sean Pickett
2009 NCAA Champions
Re: Hockey East - Who's in, who's out, who's home: by the numbers - 2009-10 edition
• Northeastern: 7-5-0 (14 points)
• Merrimack: 6-6-0 (12 points)
• Vermont: 5-5-2 (12 points)
• Boston University: 5-6-1 (11 points)
• UMass: 5-7-0 (10 points)
NU is the highest seed, then compare Merrimack and Vermont H2H for the next 2 seeds:
• Merrimack: 2-0-1 (5 points)
• Vermont: 0-2-1 (1 point)
So Merrimack would be 2nd and Vermont 3rd, Then go back to the tie-breaker standings and BU would be 4th and UMass last.
Sean
Todd, thanks for this post. I started to write something along the same lines, but I stopped and never got back to it. I agree that the "tie-breaker standings" should just be used from top to bottom for seeding. If there is anothe tie just compare those teams H2H. Using Jim Connelly's example:I think "more sense" in this case, as it so often is, is arbitrary. The case can be made for any approach.
• Northeastern: 7-5-0 (14 points)
• Merrimack: 6-6-0 (12 points)
• Vermont: 5-5-2 (12 points)
• Boston University: 5-6-1 (11 points)
• UMass: 5-7-0 (10 points)
NU is the highest seed, then compare Merrimack and Vermont H2H for the next 2 seeds:
• Merrimack: 2-0-1 (5 points)
• Vermont: 0-2-1 (1 point)
So Merrimack would be 2nd and Vermont 3rd, Then go back to the tie-breaker standings and BU would be 4th and UMass last.
Sean