Hockey East - The Off Season

[Federal League]

Re: Hockey East - The Off Season

A lot of the talk around Manchester was that Kessel will stay and don the C. I have no concrete info on that, but that seemed to be the common train of thought.

 

[slurpees]

Re: Hockey East - The Off Season

You're killing me. Da Costa is not gone...YET LOL...I know he's going to be gone, but at least give me a few days to cope with this past weekend before telling me that LOL

In the article linked before, it notes that Da Costa has signed with agents. Unless the NCAA rules are different for hockey than other sports, if you ink with an agent, your amateur status is officially done forever and you are no longer eligible. So if that still applies here, he's officially gone.

 

[slurpees]

Re: Hockey East - The Off Season

Nice summary and look-ahead, jcarter. If BU doesn't lose anyone else, which I don't expect them to, and BC loses Hayes, which I do expect them to, I'd have to think BU's the preseason favorite. I think BC will still have enough talent to finish 2nd and although they lose a lot, I like what Merrimack has coming back, too. Northeastern has some very good young players, but they also lose a lot of offense. UNH and Maine will be very interesting. They lose a lot and I don't like their young players as much as Merrimack's or Northeastern's. Never thought I'd type that last sentence.

My very preliminary gut feeling (read: little to no research, especially when it comes to incoming freshmen):

1) BU
2) BC
3) Merrimack
4) Northeastern
5) UNH
6) Maine
7) UMass
8) UVM
9) UML
10) PC

Bottom four seem pretty easy to predict, and it looks as though once again there will be a dropoff between 6 and 7. I definitelt see more "Garden crashers" next year, the main suspects being MC and NU. Both could make it again. I also don't know anything about incoming freshmen except a quick glance at BU's class, but Maine looks like it'll take a hit without Nyqvist, UNH always seems like they're set for a "down year" then they pop up, get home ice, and lose in the first round of the NCAA's again. I'd bet on that happening again. Of course BC has a question mark in goal, but there's still a lot of talent returning. I guess if you put the sum of the talent, BU probably is near the top, but they need an attitude change, and of course early departures are still a possibility. There's got to be some change in direction with their mindset because for much of this year and last, it was very unfocused. But the poor season this past year wasn't for lack of talent, so that's there. They just need to put the pieces together, be it from a coaching and/or player perspective. I could easily see them anywhere from first through missing home ice. Cue the Fire Parker crowd.

 

[Bumbles]

Re: Hockey East - The Off Season

Atkinson, Nyquist, Da Costa, Warsofsky, I think we just lost what would have been the HE first team for next year.

 

[Hokydad]

Re: Hockey East - The Off Season

Atkinson, Nyquist, Da Costa, Warsofsky, I think we just lost what would have been the HE first team for next year.

Toss J Hayes in there and it is done..

 

[Runsub5]

Re: Hockey East - The Off Season

Nice summary and look-ahead, jcarter. If BU doesn't lose anyone else, which I don't expect them to, and BC loses Hayes, which I do expect them to, I'd have to think BU's the preseason favorite. I think BC will still have enough talent to finish 2nd and although they lose a lot, I like what Merrimack has coming back, too. Northeastern has some very good young players, but they also lose a lot of offense. UNH and Maine will be very interesting. They lose a lot and I don't like their young players as much as Merrimack's or Northeastern's. Never thought I'd type that last sentence.

My very preliminary gut feeling (read: little to no research, especially when it comes to incoming freshmen):

1) BU
2) BC
3) Merrimack
4) Northeastern
5) UNH
6) Maine
7) UMass
8) UVM
9) UML
10) PC

Looks very reasonable. There's always one or two teams who develop/ bring in talent, that throws this out of whack. For example, last year Western Michigan had 8 wins and were predicted to finish next to last in the CCHA this season.

 

[Db4gb]

thinking on next year is like war plans

thinking on next year is like war plans

Considering how Hockey East will work out next year is a lot like war planning.

The planning is fun, makes you think of all the possibilities, and can consume a lot of time, but everything gets thrown away once the battle begins.

 

[steve66]

Re: Hockey East - The Off Season

Nice summary and look-ahead, jcarter. If BU doesn't lose anyone else, which I don't expect them to, and BC loses Hayes, which I do expect them to, I'd have to think BU's the preseason favorite. I think BC will still have enough talent to finish 2nd and although they lose a lot, I like what Merrimack has coming back, too. Northeastern has some very good young players, but they also lose a lot of offense. UNH and Maine will be very interesting. They lose a lot and I don't like their young players as much as Merrimack's or Northeastern's. Never thought I'd type that last sentence.

My very preliminary gut feeling (read: little to no research, especially when it comes to incoming freshmen):

1) BU
2) BC
3) Merrimack
4) Northeastern
5) UNH
6) Maine
7) UMass
8) UVM
9) UML
10) PC

My Shot


1) BU
2) BC
3) UNH
4) NU
5) Maine
6) Merrimack
7) Mass
8) VT
9) Lowell
10) Providence

This is going to be a very weak conference next year. I picked BU, but I don't think they are that good.

 

[Nick Papagiorgio]

Re: Hockey East - The Off Season

I play the percentages on this stuff.

Always pick UNH #1 in the RS. Cripes, they almost did it again this year with an absurdly stacked BC team as the national preseason #1. They lose a ton every year. Someone steps up every year.

Anywho, I think you need to keep an eye on NU. They had stuff together by the end... I think they're headed in the right direction.

Merrimack probably takes a step back but not that big of a step back. They'll be a factor...

Gotta think Maine is going to be way down there but we'll see.

 

[irishfan85]

Re: Hockey East - The Off Season

My very early predictions:

1. BU - returns most of offense, good recruits, goaltending should be good
2. BC - loses a lot of firepower and depth, but still have talent. Billet/Milner will get job done in goal.
3. UNH - loses entire first line, but as Nick said, someone always steps up at UNH.
4. MC - loses a ton of offense, but defense should be steady and some guys will step up.
5. NU - lose three big seniors, but came along at end of year.
6. UVM - Madore is a senior. I see them getting better, but this is more based on how weak league is.
7. Maine - Flynn, Abbott and then... O'Neill is only d-man I'd want on my team. Goaltending is iffy.
8. UMass - Young team last year... how could they not finish above PC and Lowell?
9. Lowell - Will have more talent returning than PC.
10. PC - Lose a lot of seniors off a bad team, will be in transition, etc.

 

[Chickens@NU]

Re: Hockey East - The Off Season

Anywho, I think you need to keep an eye on NU. They had stuff together by the end... I think they're headed in the right direction.

I question the offense. We lose our entire top line that consisted of 46 out of 108 goals and 64 out of 180 assists. HUGE loss in offensive production there.

 

[Jacques "Rabbit" Poriveau]

Re: Hockey East - The Off Season

UNH always seems like they're set for a "down year" then they pop up, get home ice, and lose in the first round of the NCAA's again. I'd bet on that happening again.

Juste to being accurate, dey always losing in da second round of da NCAAs.

It more painfull dat way, eh?

 

[NUMcNeely]

Re: Hockey East - The Off Season

Nice summary and look-ahead, jcarter. If BU doesn't lose anyone else, which I don't expect them to, and BC loses Hayes, which I do expect them to, I'd have to think BU's the preseason favorite. I think BC will still have enough talent to finish 2nd and although they lose a lot, I like what Merrimack has coming back, too. Northeastern has some very good young players, but they also lose a lot of offense. UNH and Maine will be very interesting. They lose a lot and I don't like their young players as much as Merrimack's or Northeastern's. Never thought I'd type that last sentence.

My very preliminary gut feeling (read: little to no research, especially when it comes to incoming freshmen):

1) BU
2) BC
3) Merrimack
4) Northeastern
5) UNH
6) Maine
7) UMass
8) UVM
9) UML
10) PC

This prediction is very solid, as is almost if not al of your insight. The thing with UNH the past few years has been someone has stepped up and gone from a solid player in the conference to an animal, I think Moses could do that next year, he's really impressive and if he puts in the work in the offseason I think he could help carry the cats. I don't know what to think of NU, I see the talent that remains on offense but it didn't produce this year, Justin Daniels, Garret Verm, and Steve Quailer all need to step up and Cody Ferriero needs to keep playing like he did down the stretch. If that happens we are fine, otherwise we are like UVM this year, good on defense, but we can't do anything in the offensive zone. PC/UML/Umass are still rebuilding, I think the minutemen have a good recruiting class coming in, I'll look into that more when work gets less busy. bu id agree is the early favorite, LOTS OF TALENT, if they can get leadership (which I did not see /get a sense of) in the last 5 games we played them. Is that a small window to make a judgement on a team on a super subjective subject? Yes, but it was also the most important games they played in all year. What do I mean get a sense of? Didn't see much talking on the ice/defending teammates and saw a lot of goonish play (both sides were chippy) but I didn't see anyone go in there and say cut it out like I did NU's guys. Rip that analysis if you want, but I think most bu fans would agree that leadership was a problem on this year's and last year's team. bc has the best coach in college hockey, they'll get home ice with the talent they have left over. Mack keeps a lot on offense, defense they are OK and if Cannata stays they should be right in the thick of the home ice race again, I don't see a repeat trip to the NCAA's though. I see maine being really bad next year, just a gut, but I think they lose A LOT with gustav who really made everyone around him better. Plus they lose a lot on the blueline, they might as well put a wet paper bag in goal. I'll post a prediction when all the studs leave, but just some thoughts for now.

 

[mpereira]

Re: Hockey East - The Off Season

bu id agree is the early favorite, LOTS OF TALENT, if they can get leadership (which I did not see /get a sense of) in the last 5 games we played them. Is that a small window to make a judgement on a team on a super subjective subject? Yes, but it was also the most important games they played in all year. What do I mean get a sense of? Didn't see much talking on the ice/defending teammates and saw a lot of goonish play (both sides were chippy) but I didn't see anyone go in there and say cut it out like I did NU's guys. Rip that analysis if you want, but I think most bu fans would agree that leadership was a problem on this year's and last year's team.

I don't agree that leadership was a problem this year with the the team. It was more of just unable being able to get the job done on the ice. I think everyone will agree that Pereira, Connolly and Warsofsky were solid leaders off the ice this season especially people who were around the team. Warsofsky obviously had a down year on production on the ice but in that NU series(all five games) the shots were going both ways and I saw no attempt by NU captains to stop any of it. The skirmish after the final game was based on an altercation between your coach and Clendening. If anything your coach should be the one defusing conflict not starting it. I know this story is dead and over now but I don't think the leadership was the issue this year as it was last year. Last year was a mess off the ice and the motivation to play. This year's team always had each other's backs almost to a fault with some dumb penalties at times. Do you remember how Nicastro took out an NU guy at Matthews after he hit Ruikka from behind. This year's team problem was extreme inconsistentency whether it was being young or just not coming together as a team. This is something that will needed to be fixed for next season if they want to be the favorite everyone is picking them to be. These predictions are more of a result of the amount of talent more so than what they did this year. There are always going to be some dumb penalties taken throughout the season and Parker usually handles with them harshily(suspending Chiasson for one in the PC home and home.)

 

[J.D.]

I'm seeing BU as a clear favorite for next year. Agree or not?

A "clear" favorite? Not even close.

 

[John_Fuller]

Re: Hockey East - The Off Season

This is a great post so far and I've enjoyed reading it.

Overall, I think Hockey East is actually going to be weaker nationally next year than this. Don't be surprised if we see another finish like 2009-2010 where points and tiebreakers separate first from ninth.

Home Ice Group BU, BC, UNH, and Merrimack

For BC, I agree, losing Muse is going to have a bigger impact than losing Atkinson. Milner is by default one of the better goalies in HE on paper compared with most HE teams put on ice. BC still has a load of offensive talent (S. Whitney, Mullane, Almedia) and will be all but assured of getting home ice next year. Also, is Kreider staying put??

BU is my early pick for next year to win HE. They have a load of good, young talent and in the long run, losing Warsofsky early may actually benefit BU and be a blessing in disguise. Coyle has the potential to have a monster year and expect Gill to shine.

UNH is all set in net and has good overal team speed. The defense should be solid as long as Kessel doesn't leave. The obvious question, how much offense can the team pick up as a whole from Sislo, Thompson, and DeSimone. They will get home ice, but I don't expect them scoring 5/6 a night in Durham.

We saw how Merrimack performed when DaCosta was sidelined. Sure, Merrimack will be a completely different team without him but teams are going to dread entering a reenergized Volpe. Cannata showed this weekend that he still needs some work on the second and fourth ND goals on Saturday.

Wild Cards: Northeastern and Maine

Northeastern has probably some of the best raw talent with so much potential and a very decent goalie in Rawlings. How many of your were impressed with their Beanpot and Hockey East run?? Sure, they lose a lot of leadership up front but this could be an NCAA tournament team in two years. The catch...how hard does the NCAA bee-itch slap NU for their "transgressions". If it's severe, that could be a problem.

Maine appears to be in trouble. Nyquist was more than half their team and if Abbott or Flynn take off, the Penobscot County "Harbormaster" may have a difficult time keeping Maine fans on dry land. They lost an awful lot on defense...Dimmen was one of the most underrated in HE. They can be anywhere between 4-10.

Bottom Draw: UVM, UMA, Lowell, and PC

UVM: Can Madore get the consistency he had two years ago? That's one big question. Is Stalberg the "go to guy" for offense? I really like Lenz and Brickley though. Didn't see a lot of UVM this year.

UMass: Losing Langeraap and Dainton is big. Anyone know if Syner is a flight risk? Teglia may surprise a lot a people and I think can be a very servicable goalie for the Minuteman. Adam Phillips is going to be a good one in this league for a long time. Again, another young team trying to find a niche but these guys absolutely destroyed my team this past season.

Lowell and PC: A lot depends on the coaching changes this year. Lowell is in a little better position than PC but not by much. Lowell should make the playoffs next year and could be anywhere between 6-10 but no higher. I honestly don't know what to expect from my team next year.

PC is at least two years away from making the playoffs. Don't know much about them but I don't see any name besides Berglund that scare me.

 

[SkinsFan09]

Re: Hockey East - The Off Season

NU is interesting. They lose the entire top line and MacLeod who put together a 40 point season. McNeely is 30 points gone. Tuckerman however, returns next year from injury. Brodie Reid is coming off a 28 point freshman season. For god's sake he cannot regress. Pimm and Dongara both had decent freshman years but Dongara is just such a great skater. Beanpot goal was unreal. The defense will be very stout with Eibler, Bitteto and soon-to-be first round draft pick Jamie Oleksiak all becoming sophomores. Drew Muench returns also on D. Witt at the very least should get half the starts next year. Witt is a great goaltender, I just hope the coaching staff realizes how good he is.

Question is all on offense. Do the rookies progress? Do the incoming rookies produce?

It's interesting, it's almost like a changing of the guard in HE. So many longtime great producers gone.

Da Costa, Nyquist, Atkinson, Gibbons, MacLeod, Warsofsky all gone. That's like the entire two all-star teams.


At lease it'll make for more parity.

 

[Federal League]

Re: Hockey East - The Off Season

bu id agree is the early favorite, LOTS OF TALENT, if they can get leadership (which I did not see /get a sense of) in the last 5 games we played them. Is that a small window to make a judgement on a team on a super subjective subject? Yes, but it was also the most important games they played in all year. What do I mean get a sense of? Didn't see much talking on the ice/defending teammates and saw a lot of goonish play (both sides were chippy) but I didn't see anyone go in there and say cut it out like I did NU's guys. Rip that analysis if you want, but I think most bu fans would agree that leadership was a problem on this year's and last year's team.

I don't agree that leadership was a problem this year with the the team. It was more of just unable being able to get the job done on the ice. I think everyone will agree that Pereira, Connolly and Warsofsky were solid leaders off the ice this season especially people who were around the team. Warsofsky obviously had a down year on production on the ice but in that NU series(all five games) the shots were going both ways and I saw no attempt by NU captains to stop any of it. The skirmish after the final game was based on an altercation between your coach and Clendening. If anything your coach should be the one defusing conflict not starting it. I know this story is dead and over now but I don't think the leadership was the issue this year as it was last year. Last year was a mess off the ice and the motivation to play. This year's team always had each other's backs almost to a fault with some dumb penalties at times.

It all depends on how you define leadership. BU's captains this year did a much better job than the captains last year. The captains were definitely a plus for this young team and were not the problem in any way. That said, I wouldn't say the leadership was great, simply because the captains were the only leaders. It takes more than the three captains for a team to have good leadership, and BU didn't have much else (save for maybe Chiasson), mostly because Pereira was the only senior who saw playing time. When only 4 or 5 of your 18 skaters on any given night are upperclassmen, it's tough to have good veteran leadership.

 

[Huskies01]

Re: Hockey East - The Off Season

NU is interesting. They lose the entire top line and MacLeod who put together a 40 point season. McNeely is 30 points gone. Tuckerman however, returns next year from injury. Brodie Reid is coming off a 28 point freshman season. For god's sake he cannot regress. Pimm and Dongara both had decent freshman years but Dongara is just such a great skater. Beanpot goal was unreal. The defense will be very stout with Eibler, Bitteto and soon-to-be first round draft pick Jamie Oleksiak all becoming sophomores. Drew Muench returns also on D. Witt at the very least should get half the starts next year. Witt is a great goaltender, I just hope the coaching staff realizes how good he is.

Question is all on offense. Do the rookies progress? Do the incoming rookies produce?

It's interesting, it's almost like a changing of the guard in HE. So many longtime great producers gone.

You need to work on your Huskies my friend. Drew Meunch is never playing hockey again. Injuries. The offense is going to be led by Steve Quailer who had a slow start, picked it up, and then hit more posts and crossbars then should be legal. Except J Daniels to be better, along with Cody, and Vermessch. Tuckerman is an x-factor after missing the whole season and stinking the year before. A full season of Vroylk will be huge. Typically under Cronin one freshman a year has hit over 25 points, hopefully that continues. This team will be led by a sick defense, if everyone comes back, and Rawlings. Though he went out with a whimper, if he also comes back, as long as he continues to show improvement year over year, will be one of the top goalies in the league. He got into some bad habits at the end of the year that are easily correctable.

NU, right now without any early departures from their lineup is knocking on the door of home ice. Losing the three seniors up front will work itself out, to many guys on this team outside of those 3 and Reid had poor offensive years. If they turn it around and play to the level they can, this is a very dangerous team.

edit: the one big/interesting thing is who the captains are. Only one senior on next years team, McLauhglin.

 

[Huskies of NU]

Re: Hockey East - The Off Season

edit: the one big/interesting thing is who the captains are. Only one senior on next years team, McLauhglin.

I think you see Quailer get the C since he wore the A this year. I think McLaughlin will get one of the A's, but I don't know who gets the other.

I'm expecting another slow start for the Huskies in October, but I don't think it will be as slow as this past year. I'm thinking (hoping really) that the sophomores don't slump again this year (especially Reid), and that Quailer can finally find the back of the net. There is a lot of potential with this team, It'll just come down to how quickly they adjust to life without last year's top line. I think NU will have one of the best defensive corps in HE assuming nobody jumps ship.

I'm expecting a year very similar to 09-10 as far as parity is concerned in what will be a much softer HE. I think BC and BU will battle it out for the top spot while UNH, MC, NU and ME battle for 3-6. UMA and UVM will complete the playoff teams, and Lowell and PC are on the outside looking in again (by a wide margin).