I've been Catholic for 33 years, and it confuses me as well. My mom and her brothers and sisters got into a huge fight over this when my grandfather had a stroke, regarding his feeding tube. I know she felt if they pulled the feeding tube, they were killing him vs. letting God take him when He was ready. Now, in fairness to my mom (and the sister and brothers that agreed), that is definitely what he would have wanted.It is actually kinder to withhold fluids. With dehydration the pt becomes ketotic and they actually have less ability to feel pain, or hunger. If you provide food and liquids but no meds it is much more painful.
I am a little unclear how the Catholic Church can delineate what is OK and not OK. All the interventions are man-made. If it is the will of God to take the person if there is no intervention then why is it OK to intervene. How do they decide when you must intervene and what is too much? Not being snide. This has always puzzled me.
Actually it's the Uremia more so than the keytosis that causes the sedation, etc. Regardless, your point is correct. Renal failure is a great way to check out of this world. Sign me up. Hydration in those conditions simply prolongs the agony.It is actually kinder to withhold fluids. With dehydration the pt becomes ketotic and they actually have less ability to feel pain, or hunger. If you provide food and liquids but no meds it is much more painful.
This is precisely why I'm non-denominational but would go to a Lutheran church if I had to choose. (Most of the non-denominational churches I've been to are that new age thing I really dislike.)
Although, that being said, I haven't gone to church regularly in probably 20 years.
RIP, Mother Abagail.Actress Ruby Dee passed away last night.
I doubt this is much at this point, but John Glenn just had heart valve replacement surgery. At 93.
From a Catholic point of view, you can't starve or dehydrate a person to death - it's, in effect, capital punishment by bits and pieces. Withhold artificial machines, heroic measures? Fine. You can ease their pain, but you must let a natural death take place in its own time.
It is actually kinder to withhold fluids. With dehydration the pt becomes ketotic and they actually have less ability to feel pain, or hunger. If you provide food and liquids but no meds it is much more painful.
I am a little unclear how the Catholic Church can delineate what is OK and not OK. All the interventions are man-made. If it is the will of God to take the person if there is no intervention then why is it OK to intervene. How do they decide when you must intervene and what is too much? Not being snide. This has always puzzled me.
Actually it's the Uremia more so than the keytosis that causes the sedation, etc. Regardless, your point is correct. Renal failure is a great way to check out of this world. Sign me up. Hydration in those conditions simply prolongs the agony.
[Saopbox] Take it from a doctor who does this kind of thing day in and day out. Find out beforehand what your family members really want if something bad happens. Let your family know what you want if you can't speak. Too many times families request futile measures out of fear and guilt. If you're in doubt, ask the Dr. what they would do for their family in the same situation. Most will tell you honestly if asked. [/Soapbox]
Anyone who thinks rationing isn't going to happen better have their guardianship papers in order because they are clearly incompetent.Absolutely and positively agree. But it would appear that decisions like this may be taken away from us all as individuals as our omnipotent government decides for us.
Absolutely and positively agree. But it would appear that decisions like this may be taken away from us all as individuals as our omnipotent government decides for us.
I'm not sure what exactly you mean by that, Dr.D, but the government's efforts regarding health care have been mischaracterized at times. For example, a recent vice presidential candidate tried to scare people into thinking the government was forming "death squads" that would make life and death decisions for people, when the proposed legislation was simply an effort to get as many patients as possible to prepare advance directives (health care powers of attorney), tools that empower patients, not subjugate them.
Absolutely and positively agree. But it would appear that decisions like this may be taken away from us all as individuals as our omnipotent government decides for us.
It would be much better for the benevelent insurance companies to continue to decide for us.
I'm not sure what exactly you mean by that, Dr.D, but the government's efforts regarding health care have been mischaracterized at times. For example, a recent vice presidential candidate tried to scare people into thinking the government was forming "death squads" that would make life and death decisions for people, when the proposed legislation was simply an effort to get as many patients as possible to prepare advance directives (health care powers of attorney), tools that empower patients, not subjugate them.