What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Headline News Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Headline News Thread

ScoobyDoo said:
Keystone XL approved today in Nebraska. Despite spill in South Dakota.
http://www.postbulletin.com/busines...cle_e822414a-1d9a-5b8a-ba7c-cb2670124b18.html
Click to expand...

An oil spill is bad.
And 210,000 gallons is a big number.

However, as with everything, consider it in scope. The 210,000 gallons is 5000 barrels (42 gal/bbl). That section of the pipeline moves 500,000 bbl per day.

One percent of one day leaked.

I'd say Keystone's safeguards and systems worked. They detected the leak, shut down the pipeline, and isolated the problem so that 1% of that day's transport was released.

Still not happy about it; however, imagine if there wasn't the diligence shown (and legally required).
 
Re: Headline News Thread

And one more thing:

I led a project where we installed a novel solvent leak detection system at the plant I worked at. We are able to detect leaks of less than 0.5% flow rate in under 30 seconds. As we tune the system, we expect it to cap out at about 10-15 lbs in a line capable of well over 800 lb/min. If that thing ran 24 hours we would be looking at 0.00091% of the daily output of the pipe. And that’s using the conservative number of 800 lb/min and wireless technology. If we had used wired technology we would have gotten that down to around 0.1% flow difference and cut the max spill even more.


That oil pipeline’s detection and leak prevention system is absolute horsesh-it.
 
Last edited:
Re: Headline News Thread

dxmnkd316 said:
And one more thing:

I led a project where we installed a novel solvent leak detection system at the plant I worked at. We are able to detect leaks of less than 0.5% flow rate in under 30 seconds. As we tune the system, we expect it to cap out at about 10-15 lbs in a line capable of well over 800 lb/min. If that thing ran 24 hours we would be looking at 0.00091% of the daily output of the pipe. And that’s using the conservative number of 800 lb/min and wireless technology. If we had used wired technology we would have gotten that down to around 0.1% flow difference and cut the max spill even more.


That oil pipeline’s detection and leak prevention system is absolute horsesh-it.
Click to expand...

Applause to you for that level of performance in a closed environment (your plant).

This is a transcontinental system where temperature differences at pumping stations can account for the detectable changes you claim.

On a transcontinental pipeline getting 1% isolation is solid performance.
 
Re: Headline News Thread

***** please. A temperature transmitter costs 3,500 bucks and that oil is constantly flowing. Temperature variation had to be accounted for in our system too. It was ridiculously simple and cost us around $50,000 for ten separate systems.
 
Re: Headline News Thread

The Sicatoka said:
Applause to you for that level of performance in a closed environment (your plant).

This is a transcontinental system where temperature differences at pumping stations can account for the detectable changes you claim.

On a transcontinental pipeline getting 1% isolation is solid performance.
Click to expand...

The logic defies me too. Huge spill is OK because it could have been bigger. Yup. Too lazy to think of the multiple analogies that would make this look silly.
 
Re: Headline News Thread

So because we’ve seen worse this isn’t bad? I know that’s not what you’re saying but it’s the logic you’re using.

This was something like the tenth largest spill in the US since 2007. This was bad others were disasters. Doesn’t make this any better.
 
Re: Headline News Thread

dxmnkd316 said:
So because we’ve seen worse this isn’t bad? I know that’s not what you’re saying but it’s the logic you’re using.

This was something like the tenth largest spill in the US since 2007. This was bad others were disasters. Doesn’t make this any better.
Click to expand...

I think pipelines are the way to go, ultimately. When the Bakken fields were churning out so much oil that it was clogging the railroads throughout MN, causing serious issues for supplying our power plants. We need to diversify our delivery methods, and try to make them as safe as possible. Pipelines are safer than people want to admit, though we still need to work on ways of making them even safer.
 
St. Clown said:
I think pipelines are the way to go, ultimately. When the Bakken fields were churning out so much oil that it was clogging the railroads throughout MN, causing serious issues for supplying our power plants. We need to diversify our delivery methods, and try to make them as safe as possible. Pipelines are safer than people want to admit, though we still need to work on ways of making them even safer.
Click to expand...
That costs money. So won't happen. Instead we'll build the pipeline and destroy the environment. Win win for the 1%.
 
Re: Headline News Thread

St. Clown said:
I think pipelines are the way to go, ultimately. When the Bakken fields were churning out so much oil that it was clogging the railroads throughout MN, causing serious issues for supplying our power plants. We need to diversify our delivery methods, and try to make them as safe as possible. Pipelines are safer than people want to admit, though we still need to work on ways of making them even safer.
Click to expand...

I completely agree. So we can’t give them passes on these kinds of spills. Especially when they are running right over what is perhaps the world’s most important aquifer.
 
Re: Headline News Thread

If I want to make it down to anything south of GDO, it’s going to be a major PITA. Getting to work was fine this morning. But I had a scouting report that Century was awful yesterday with all the trucks. So I knew of a few backroads that would be fine.

The hole opened about 2-3 miles south of me. It’s a major inconvenience to the east metro. That’s a massive highway that’s clogged on a good day. And it’s not like they closed it between the two closest exits, they closed it from 36 all the way to 94 preventing all local traffic from accessing it. I get why they did it, I’m just not sure I’m fully bought in. They would have had to force all traffic off at CR-5 going south and 10th st going north. There is absolutely no way to handle that volume on any local streets.

If we had anything more than 2-3” of snow coming, this would be biblically bad for anyone east of 35W. I say 35W because 494 and 694 would be completely stopped up with all east side north/south traffic. 35E wouldn’t even be an escape because everyone would be on that and it’s already awful during the winter rush hour.

Here's a link to the current camera shot:
https://video.dot.state.mn.us/video/image/metro/C724?1512409610095

:eek:


ETA: The absolute worst part about this is that concrete road was finished only a few years ago. It was still virtually pristine. I'm hoping they aren't going to have to cut it apart which will inevitably create Buick-sized potholes within a year.
 
Last edited:
Re: Headline News Thread

I'd probably go east to Radio Dr, or similar. My gf works at a Catholic church in Oakdale, just east of Century, on 15th St. She's hosed. In fact, when I go there to pick her up for a date, I might go so far as to get off 494 at Lake Rd in Woodbury, and take that over to Radio Dr or Woodbury Dr, up to 10th or 15, whichever will get me across 694 the quickest.
 
Re: Headline News Thread

If you're coming from the west, I would agree and recommend going into Woodbury and cutting back.

Whatever you do, stay away from 3M's campus. Everywhere between McKnight and 694 is going to be bad. Century is bad when 694 is good. I'm not even going to guess at how bad it might get tonight.

As always though, check google maps. Google is gospel.
 
Re: Headline News Thread

I'm just thinking, how bad would have it been had that sinkhole happened during this morning's rush hour? :eek:
 
Re: Headline News Thread

Um. 694 was closed this morning and will be closed for the entire week. Or more.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top