What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Gender Studies I

Status
Not open for further replies.
These two statements are contradictory. If you were actually okay with people adopting “new” gender identities, then you would be able to look us in the keyboard and say, “A trans woman IS a woman, and that woman happened to be born with a dick.”

But you won’t, because deep down in your brain, you don’t believe that trans women ARE women. You see it as “taking on a role” or “play acting,” not as being an expression of who they truly are. Putting on the clothes, adopting new patterns of speech, even surgery, are all just the outward, physical signs of the person inside.

Denying that someone is who they know themselves to be IS hate, no matter how much you think that the many other non-hateful things you do in other areas of your life somehow prove that you can’t be hateful in this way.

Given how marginalized and vulnerable the trans community is, yes, seeing expressions of hate toward them makes my blood boil - I would have more understanding towards people who pulled the wing off of flies or kicked puppies.

Also, as a trans woman, I can show you pictures of where I was 10 years ago to the person I am now. The difference is night and day.

And dx, expanding further, I will also say that it's hateful when bigots reduce my right to exist and participate in society as I am to a debate, in the same way one debates pineapple on pizza or ketchup on hot dogs. Also, phobes will say "I don't hate you," then accuse trans women and the drag community of rape, grooming, and pedophilia, for which there is no evidence.
 
Also, as a trans woman, I can show you pictures of where I was 10 years ago to the person I am now. The difference is night and day.

And dx, expanding further, I will also say that it's hateful when bigots reduce my right to exist and participate in society as I am to a debate, in the same way one debates pineapple on pizza or ketchup on hot dogs. Also, phobes will say "I don't hate you," then accuse trans women and the drag community of rape, grooming, and pedophilia, for which there is no evidence.

Particularly since the groomers, rapists, and pedophiles are inevitably rightwing evangelicals and Catholics.
 
Also, as a trans woman, I can show you pictures of where I was 10 years ago to the person I am now. The difference is night and day.

And dx, expanding further, I will also say that it's hateful when bigots reduce my right to exist and participate in society as I am to a debate, in the same way one debates pineapple on pizza or ketchup on hot dogs. Also, phobes will say "I don't hate you," then accuse trans women and the drag community of rape, grooming, and pedophilia, for which there is no evidence.

Team pineapple and ketchup.

Being serious for a moment (though, I am serious about ketchup and pineapple) I don't disagree. But I guess I didn't follow why you tagged me here. I wanted to make sure I didn't say anything stupider than usual
 
210 (ish) pieces of anti-trans legislation proposed this year, including bans on affirming care up to age 26.

At least 90% of those bills have been proposed in states ranking at or near the bottom in quality of life, infrastructure, and child welfare.
 
What possible legal issues are there for gender that don't involve a locker room or bathroom?

And I'm excluding those two scenarios because they're somehow safe harbor for conservatives.

There exist a whole ton of legal issues.

Think about it; the possibilities are nearly endless, if one can shape-change at will.
 
Last edited:
These two statements are contradictory. If you were actually okay with people adopting “new” gender identities, then you would be able to look us in the keyboard and say, “A trans woman IS a woman, and that woman happened to be born with a dick.”

But you won’t, because deep down in your brain, you don’t believe that trans women ARE women. You see it as “taking on a role” or “play acting,” not as being an expression of who they truly are. Putting on the clothes, adopting new patterns of speech, even surgery, are all just the outward, physical signs of the person inside.

Denying that someone is who they know themselves to be IS hate, no matter how much you think that the many other non-hateful things you do in other areas of your life somehow prove that you can’t be hateful in this way.

Given how marginalized and vulnerable the trans community is, yes, seeing expressions of hate toward them makes my blood boil - I would have more understanding towards people who pulled the wing off of flies or kicked puppies.

You go ahead and kick all the puppies you want to kick. What you say amounts to exactly that.

I don't hate anyone.

But, I have a brain, and possess the ability to process the inevitable outcomes of certain misplaced "logic".
 
If "shape-shifting at will" were a thing, I damn sure wouldn't have chosen something that meant societal, political, and familial maltreatment.

I'd have picked Pink Fire Breathing Dragon.
 
I don't hate anyone.

That is good, and perhaps because of that you should take pause from the fact that LOTS of us are telling you the effect of your words and your attitudes causes people pain. Maybe you should consider the effect of your opinions on others, and perhaps you should say to yourself, "Self, now I know you feel this very strongly, but isn't it immaterial in the end what editorial opinion you have about these people whereas, on the other hand, they have to actually live their lives?"

And, most importantly, maybe because you have empathy you should consider that anti-trans rhetoric supports an environment in which trans people are under threat of both legal consequences and physical violence, and psychological harm of such a magnitude many attempt suicide.

What idea is worth that damage? You don't hate people and you don't wish them harm. So stand down.
 
Last edited:
If "shape-shifting at will" were a thing, I damn sure wouldn't have chosen something that meant societal, political, and familial maltreatment.

I'd have picked Pink Fire Breathing Dragon.

I was hoping you could teach me shape shifting because I'd like to shape shift to this:

Chris-Attoh.jpg
 
That is good, and perhaps because of that you should take pause from the fact that LOTS of us are telling you the effect of your words and your attitudes causes people pain. Maybe you should consider the effect of your opinions on others, and perhaps you should say to yourself, "Self, now I know you feel this very strongly, but isn't it immaterial in the end what editorial opinion you have about these people whereas, on the other hand, they have to actually live their lives?"

And, most importantly, maybe because you have empathy you should consider that anti-trans rhetoric supports an environment in which trans people are under threat of both legal consequences and physical violence, and psychological harm of such a magnitude many attempt suicide.

What idea is worth that damage? You don't hate people and you don't wish them harm. So stand down.

"hate" to conservatives is interesting. What's the term for something that changes whether it's coming to you or away from you? Doppler effect is the only thing I could think of.

Anyways. It's interesting. For a conservative, "hate" going outward from them to others means that they don't think they should be executed, the weakest form of the word hate. BUt when it's perceived as coming towards them, it gains strength and is amplied to be any sort of remote disagreement with their preconceived notions.
 
"hate" to conservatives is interesting. What's the term for something that changes whether it's coming to you or away from you? Doppler effect is the only thing I could think of.

Anyways. It's interesting. For a conservative, "hate" going outward from them to others means that they don't think they should be executed, the weakest form of the word hate. BUt when it's perceived as coming towards them, it gains strength and is amplied to be any sort of remote disagreement with their preconceived notions.

Either that or they really are so think-skinned and fragile that disapproval of their bigotry really does feel to them the equivalent of when they lynch people.

At a certain point, the screaming of conservatives like scalded babies when you tell them their sky god was just a metaphor must be taken seriously. We are dealing with snowflakes.
 
That is good, and perhaps because of that you should take pause from the fact that LOTS of us are telling you the effect of your words and your attitudes causes people pain. Maybe you should consider the effect of your opinions on others, and perhaps you should say to yourself, "Self, now I know you feel this very strongly, but isn't it immaterial in the end what editorial opinion you have about these people whereas, on the other hand, they have to actually live their lives?"

And, most importantly, maybe because you have empathy you should consider that anti-trans rhetoric supports an environment in which trans people are under threat of both legal consequences and physical violence, and psychological harm of such a magnitude many attempt suicide.

What idea is worth that damage? You don't hate people and you don't wish them harm. So stand down.

It's not "anti-trans", Einstein... It's "pro-biology", or perhaps "pro-science"...

Not that hard to grasp.

Aren't we libs supposed to support scientific facts, even when it's politically inconvenient?
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top