Re: Fascinating story on reality of OHL education packages vs NCAA
Jeepers, I'm out of the loop on vacation and some CIS/Canadian bashing flares up and I miss it!
To echo some earlier comments, the top CIS teams can play with Div I squads. The top schools. And those schools are predominately NOT in Ontario, which unfortunately in this respect, makes up half the CIS. There is a depth issue in the CIS, and it is predominately in the OUA conference where many teams don't take recruiting seriously.
However, we're comparing apples and oranges. I love the CIS and like the NCAA, but one league is made up of former CHL and Junior A players and is on average a bit older than the other. That would be the CIS if you haven't been paying attention.
As has been pointed out before, the CHL and the CIS are PARTNERS. The quality of CIS teams have improved as more and more young men are are least paying token interest to education while playing Junior, and then making sure to use those CHL education packages to get a tuition-free education, and is some cases a 'full ride' if their CHL team topped up their league package.
Is the CHL doing this to compete with the NCAA for players? Of course they are. The team owners run for-profit businesses, and if they can woo an impact player by promising his education at a later date, then everyone is happy. Except maybe the NCAA.
As for the questionable graduation stats the newspaper columnist pulls out of his rectum, well, you can probably guess that I find them suspect. I do know that as a country Canada has a higher percentage of citizens graduate from college/university than the U.S., and is one of the tops in the world in that respect. Maybe we don't have exclusive Ivy League schools in Canada, but then our graduates didn't set out to ruin the world's economy either (i.e Wall Street = Ivy League in case I didn't make my point well). Btw, the safest banks in the world? Canada.
But enough of the nationalism/chauvinism. A large chunk of former CHL (and Junior A) players get to attend a post-secondary institution on an education package that many non-jocks would kill for. We don't appear to have accurate statistics for how many, so maybe we should stop repeating pie-in-the-sky numbers from reporters-with-an-agenda as facts.
The real question for me is what can or will CHA do about it?