Is there some warped belief this is a conspiracy against Minnesota schools? Or were there delusional fans who believed if each were put into separate regionals instead that all three would make it to the Frozen Four? Geographically it makes sense they're there and it's going to be some damn good hockey. None are from the same conference either, and Pairwise-wise, I don't think much was changed other than Penn State and Ohio State were moved around and there was a lower seed either Merrimack, Canisius or Colgate that was out of order.
You're seeing the persecution complex of Gopher fans coming out. As an MSU fan, I'm just happy our guys don't have to travel far and we'll be able to have some fans there (and I'd love for our boys to have the opportunity to try to end their season for a third year in a row). Every time we've been the 1 or 2 seed we've been shipped out east and haven't had any advantages and have, in fact, been disadvantaged by having a road game (playing Providence in Providence). They just aren't used to having every advantage going their way in every scenario and when it doesn't they whine like a 3-year-old. Just nod and smile, it will make it much easier to deal with.
And, yes, Gopher fans, I know every fan base complains. You just have such a large fan base that it seems like there are so many.....and I like to needle you after having to put up with it for a couple of decades.
Wow, somebody has an axe to grind...
The majority of gopher fans on this site and that I know personally aren't bent out of shape about the regional. Thinking that people on Twitter or Reddit are representative of any demographic is pretty clueless.
This was clearly going to be the Fargo bracket. Swapping SCSUvMankato out east would have created 3 (4?) flights that otherwise didn't need to exist and would have been prohibitive to teams' fans that would want to try to attend. Swapping MNvCan to Allentown would have the same problem though to a lesser extent. So, this is what you get.
Personally, my preference would have been for the Gophers to play Canisius in Allentown, but w/e. Mich and DU are the only teams I really wouldn't want to see in the regional and that was an impossibility anyway.
To me this is just further evidence that the first round should be played at the higher seed's home. You eliminate the pseudo home ice advantage for lower seed's we have now; by going with straight PWR you eliminate the gymnastics the committee has to do; you get a good atmosphere for every game.
Stauber,
Can you add more detail to your proposal about higher seeds hosting the first round?
Are you only thinking about the round of 16, or are you thinking of the entire regional?
I'm not sure what Quinnipiac would do to host 4 teams in their area, but obviously, Minn, Mich and Den could easily do it.
Otherwise, the top 8 would all be hosting single games. Minn, Quinn, Mich, Den, BU, SCSU, Harv, Penn State. Those would all be full buildings of large size (although I don't know about Harvard). But, there could be a time when MTU or someone else would host, and then there wouldn't be as much capacity.
So, I'm really just wondering about your whole idea here. I'm sure you have one, I just would like to see what it is.
Thanks
Wow, somebody has an axe to grind...
The majority of gopher fans on this site and that I know personally aren't bent out of shape about the regional. Thinking that people on Twitter or Reddit are representative of any demographic is pretty clueless.
First round. Eliminate the bye week. Quarterfinals at 2 different sites that draw well.
This has come up countless times over the years and I'm now regretting bringing it up again because I'm not too keen on hearing the same tired arguments.
I remember all of those discussions also, and I remember concluding that there wasn't an idea that was 'perfect in every way.' Yours is interesting, though.
Not really an age to grind. Just heard it enough in enough.different places to know it's not exactly a fringe argument. More than anything, this is the only time of year that I get to needle a different fan base. We lost all our common opponents and miss the back and forth and it gives me a chance to do it....especially those that stick their heads out once.a year.
Honestly, all in good fun.
First round. Eliminate the bye week. Quarterfinals at 2 different sites that draw well.
This has come up countless times over the years and I'm now regretting bringing it up again because I'm not too keen on hearing the same tired arguments.
Fargo, not Grand Forks. Scheels Arena, not Englestad Arena.I really don't think most fans are upset about getting to play rivals potentially and in Grand Forks no less. I mean frankly, nothing feels better than giving a double middle finger to ND fans while they watch us beat whomever in their rink and celebrate on their ice.
Precious few things in life are "perfect in every way."
Selecting the best option doesn't require a perfect one.
But again, it's not my intent to derail the thread so I'll drop it.
You're seeing the persecution complex of Gopher fans coming out. As an MSU fan, I'm just happy our guys don't have to travel far and we'll be able to have some fans there (and I'd love for our boys to have the opportunity to try to end their season for a third year in a row). Every time we've been the 1 or 2 seed we've been shipped out east and haven't had any advantages and have, in fact, been disadvantaged by having a road game (playing Providence in Providence). They just aren't used to having every advantage going their way in every scenario and when it doesn't they whine like a 3-year-old. Just nod and smile, it will make it much easier to deal with.
And, yes, Gopher fans, I know every fan base complains. You just have such a large fan base that it seems like there are so many.....and I like to needle you after having to put up with it for a couple of decades.