What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

ESPN and Hockey East Reach Multi-Year Agreement

Re: ESPN and Hockey East Reach Multi-Year Agreement

The #1 goal for Hockey East should be creating and distributing a "Pay Per View" internet package like the NCHC and to a lesser extent, the new WCHA. Why can't or why won't the league get it together? I don't think this question has been definitively answered.

Some schools subsidize the stream (whether on their own, through a student union, or alumni donations) in order to advertise the product. In person audience doesn't really change all that much as people will find a way to experience the game, even if it's radio. However, when you make the video available to potential recruits, whether live or in archive, it's a great tool for the schools with not so big of a reputation to get their name out there. By forcing pay per view, you give more power to the "haves".
 
Re: ESPN and Hockey East Reach Multi-Year Agreement

The #1 goal for Hockey East should be creating and distributing a "Pay Per View" internet package like the NCHC and to a lesser extent, the new WCHA. Why can't or why won't the league get it together? I don't think this question has been definitively answered.

That sounds like a lot of work. HEA would probably rather just let the schools handle it. Don’t they only have like 4 full time employees?
 
Re: ESPN and Hockey East Reach Multi-Year Agreement

I really enjoyed seeing WI and ND on NBC Sportsnet this afternoon. Too bad it was opposite the AFC Championship game. (Though I did have clicker luck and saw all 3 goals). Hockey East should work to get a few games on the National Hockey Network. #QualityExposure
 
Re: ESPN and Hockey East Reach Multi-Year Agreement

The #1 goal for Hockey East should be creating and distributing a "Pay Per View" internet package like the NCHC and to a lesser extent, the new WCHA. Why can't or why won't the league get it together? I don't think this question has been definitively answered.

I just recently bought into the WCHA tv to watch NMU. I am very pleased with the quality picture on my TV. We get replays and the play by play comes from the local radio station. Cost me 20 bucks to get five games, and I can get every league game streamed for the season for a little over 100.

For us lesser teams, it's great.
 
Re: ESPN and Hockey East Reach Multi-Year Agreement

I watched the Ivy League Network this year. It was decent.

I just recently bought into the WCHA tv to watch NMU. I am very pleased with the quality picture on my TV. We get replays and the play by play comes from the local radio station. Cost me 20 bucks to get five games, and I can get every league game streamed for the season for a little over 100.

For us lesser teams, it's great.

WCHA.tv is very, very, very dependent upon the school providing the broadcast. Bemidji used to have the best broadcast before the school cut ties with the local public TV affiliate who'd broadcast their games for years. Mankato has a great broadcast as well. UAH and LSSU ... well, they have a broadcast.

GFM
 
I watched the Ivy League Network this year. It was decent.



WCHA.tv is very, very, very dependent upon the school providing the broadcast. Bemidji used to have the best broadcast before the school cut ties with the local public TV affiliate who'd broadcast their games for years. Mankato has a great broadcast as well. UAH and LSSU ... well, they have a broadcast.

GFM

Did Bemidji willing cut ties to their local public tv? Bowling Green has been trying to air some games on their own public tv station (owned by BGSU), and run into problems with the league (the way I understand it). They did manage to get 2 games to broadcast, but apparently wanted a lot more.
 
Re: ESPN and Hockey East Reach Multi-Year Agreement

Did Bemidji willing cut ties to their local public tv? Bowling Green has been trying to air some games on their own public tv station (owned by BGSU), and run into problems with the league (the way I understand it). They did manage to get 2 games to broadcast, but apparently wanted a lot more.

I do not know why the change was made.

GFM
 
The #1 goal for Hockey East should be creating and distributing a "Pay Per View" internet package like the NCHC and to a lesser extent, the new WCHA. Why can't or why won't the league get it together? I don't think this question has been definitively answered.

ppv when it’s free?

Who’d pay for something that’s free?
 
Re: ESPN and Hockey East Reach Multi-Year Agreement

ppv when it’s free?

Who’d pay for something that’s free?

There's no such thing as a free lunch. It's just a matter of who bears the responsibility to pay for the service. Some are willing to eat it as a cost of advertising the school, while others want the viewer to pay.

That does beg the question: With some of the leagues mandating in-period breaks (AHC first whistle after each 5 minutes, ECAC first whistle after 10, don't know about the others), would local corporate establishments be willing to pay money to advertise on these streams to help subsidize the cost? Is that even doable if the production is done "in-house", meaning it's a non-profit doing the cast? Are the ratings even high enough for markets that it'd be worth it to the advertiser?
 
Re: ESPN and Hockey East Reach Multi-Year Agreement

I watched the Ivy League Network this year. It was decent.

It's getting better, as streaming has been across the board, but there is a huge difference between when they pick up an actual network transmission like Empire vs local yokel feeds of programs that don't put much effort into it (Brown, Yale, and frankly us).
 
Re: ESPN and Hockey East Reach Multi-Year Agreement

It's getting better, as streaming has been across the board, but there is a huge difference between when they pick up an actual network transmission like Empire vs local yokel feeds of programs that don't put much effort into it (Brown, Yale, and frankly us).

Empire still exists? I thought they went belly up in 2005, and the Sabres games went to MSG. ;)
 
Re: ESPN and Hockey East Reach Multi-Year Agreement

local yokel feeds of programs that don't put much effort into it (Brown, Yale, and frankly us).
Yale's feed used to be pretty good before the ILDN took over. From what I understand, Yale was gifted money for all the equipment along with seed money to get it off the ground, and they did an exceptional job for a couple of seasons. Then the ILDN comes in and says use your equipment to supply the feed to us. Not sure whether the current production is as good as it was when they were providing it free.
 
Re: ESPN and Hockey East Reach Multi-Year Agreement

Yale's feed used to be pretty good before the ILDN took over. From what I understand, Yale was gifted money for all the equipment along with seed money to get it off the ground, and they did an exceptional job for a couple of seasons. Then the ILDN comes in and says use your equipment to supply the feed to us. Not sure whether the current production is as good as it was when they were providing it free.

Considering there probably isn't any subsidy, they just decided not to put any more effort into it. Similar to when RPI had a home playoff series a couple years ago, RPI-TV put out a statement about how they would not provide their feed to the ECAC for their PPV pleasure without just compensation, and the ECAC would be required to send someone if they wanted people to pay to watch the stream. So there was some awkward camera setup in the aisle above the student section.
 
There's no such thing as a free lunch. It's just a matter of who bears the responsibility to pay for the service. Some are willing to eat it as a cost of advertising the school, while others want the viewer to pay.

That does beg the question: With some of the leagues mandating in-period breaks (AHC first whistle after each 5 minutes, ECAC first whistle after 10, don't know about the others), would local corporate establishments be willing to pay money to advertise on these streams to help subsidize the cost? Is that even doable if the production is done "in-house", meaning it's a non-profit doing the cast? Are the ratings even high enough for markets that it'd be worth it to the advertiser?

Mookie has a free dinner today

Free breakfast too now that he thinks about it
 
Re: ESPN and Hockey East Reach Multi-Year Agreement

Did Bemidji willing cut ties to their local public tv? Bowling Green has been trying to air some games on their own public tv station (owned by BGSU), and run into problems with the league (the way I understand it). They did manage to get 2 games to broadcast, but apparently wanted a lot more.

BSU thinks putting games on TV is hurting attendance.
 
Back
Top