Re: Elections 2012: You must choose the lesser of two weevils
Is this what passes for libtard "thought" these days? Pity.
Is this what passes for libtard "thought" these days? Pity.
USCHO Fan Forum
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.
- Status
P
Priceless
Guest
Re: Elections 2012: You must choose the lesser of two weevils
Why wait for the cops? Just shoot the darkies and say you were "standing your ground."
Why wait for the cops? Just shoot the darkies and say you were "standing your ground."
Re: Elections 2012: You must choose the lesser of two weevils
I suppose one by one all the ladies in the chorale are going to jump in here, to show the rest of us how "thoughtful" they are.
I suppose one by one all the ladies in the chorale are going to jump in here, to show the rest of us how "thoughtful" they are.
P
Priceless
Guest
Re: Elections 2012: You must choose the lesser of two weevils
Donald Trump for Romney:
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/mV4ObeKx5aw" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Donald Trump for Romney:
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/mV4ObeKx5aw" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
P
Priceless
Guest
Re: Elections 2012: You must choose the lesser of two weevils
Check back November 7.
Check back November 7.
Re: Elections 2012: You must choose the lesser of two weevils
Will is right. Trump is a clown. But didn't His Oneness fob himself off as having been born in Kenya? Maybe he's only 1/32 Kenyan.
Are the first two graphs of your post a quote from somewhere? Because if they are they're unattributed, as is customary with you. You really ought to cut that sh*t out.
Will is right. Trump is a clown. But didn't His Oneness fob himself off as having been born in Kenya? Maybe he's only 1/32 Kenyan.
Are the first two graphs of your post a quote from somewhere? Because if they are they're unattributed, as is customary with you. You really ought to cut that sh*t out.
Last edited:
Re: Elections 2012: You must choose the lesser of two weevils
Look for the white smoke.
Look for the white smoke.
dxmnkd316
Lucia Apologist
Foxton
Banned
Re: Elections 2012: You must choose the lesser of two weevils
I wonder if we'll finally hear about all the interesting stuff Donald was finding out that for some reason went away when Obama came out with his birth certificate.
Re: Elections 2012: You must choose the lesser of two weevils
It's like sucking up to a very rich, far less talented Regis Philbin.
It's like sucking up to a very rich, far less talented Regis Philbin.
dxmnkd316
Lucia Apologist
Re: Elections 2012: You must choose the lesser of two weevils
Why they pander to him I'll never fully understand.
Why they pander to him I'll never fully understand.
Re: Elections 2012: You must choose the lesser of two weevils
See? This is exactly what I'm talking about. You think I'm calling you racist because you disagree with me, and that made me vewy vewy mad.
I have absolutely no experience in psychology, so I can't even begin to unpack this. But there does seem to be a collective psychosis within the GOP - at least among the tea people - involving victimhood. Woe is us, we can't even think or open our mouths without being called racists by those evil libtards.
I really don't get it. In reality, I was hoping (foolishly, as it turns out) that you would think, and that you'd have the courage to actually say something instead of hiding behind your usual facade. So let me be crystal clear: I don't condescend to you because you're a conservative or because I disagree with you. I don't do it because I think you're stupid or because I think you're a racist. I do it because you're a coward. I've never once seen you be man enough to actually subject your beliefs to any sort of debate.
I'll ignore you if you ignore me. Deal?
See? This is exactly what I'm talking about. You think I'm calling you racist because you disagree with me, and that made me vewy vewy mad.
I have absolutely no experience in psychology, so I can't even begin to unpack this. But there does seem to be a collective psychosis within the GOP - at least among the tea people - involving victimhood. Woe is us, we can't even think or open our mouths without being called racists by those evil libtards.
I really don't get it. In reality, I was hoping (foolishly, as it turns out) that you would think, and that you'd have the courage to actually say something instead of hiding behind your usual facade. So let me be crystal clear: I don't condescend to you because you're a conservative or because I disagree with you. I don't do it because I think you're stupid or because I think you're a racist. I do it because you're a coward. I've never once seen you be man enough to actually subject your beliefs to any sort of debate.
I'll ignore you if you ignore me. Deal?
Kepler
Cornell Big Red
Re: Elections 2012: You must choose the lesser of two weevils
Projection is an important part of the self-identity of fascists, who relocate their own frustrated violent impulses in the world around them, and then rationalize anything they do as "defensive action." For example, the act of ramming their faith down other people's throats is "defending religious liberty." Attacking another country is "preemptive war." The leadership of the far right always cultivates this, which is why critical thinking skills and reason are their natural enemy and one of the first things they attempt to suppress. It's also why the far right is always inventing domestic demons (liberals, gays, emancipated women, ethnic minorities, religious non-conformists, intellectuals). They need someone to assign these evil impulses to, particularly since their worldview is a Manichean pot boiler.
It doesn't take a psychology degree to understand this. There is a certain portion of the right that has been playing the victimhood violin for themselves for thirty years. At the same time, they constantly "explain" others' behavior in terms of a hallucinated victimization complex.
Projection is an important part of the self-identity of fascists, who relocate their own frustrated violent impulses in the world around them, and then rationalize anything they do as "defensive action." For example, the act of ramming their faith down other people's throats is "defending religious liberty." Attacking another country is "preemptive war." The leadership of the far right always cultivates this, which is why critical thinking skills and reason are their natural enemy and one of the first things they attempt to suppress. It's also why the far right is always inventing domestic demons (liberals, gays, emancipated women, ethnic minorities, religious non-conformists, intellectuals). They need someone to assign these evil impulses to, particularly since their worldview is a Manichean pot boiler.
Last edited:
St. Clown
Ideas Posted are Likely Not My Own
Re: Elections 2012: You must choose the lesser of two weevils
If he's ignoring you, you'll not get a very good answer.
Re: Elections 2012: You must choose the lesser of two weevils
No need for any psychology here. You're a typical libtard dipstick for whom any disagreement must stem from some fundamental personal failing, the favorite of which is "racism." You larded your posts up with reflexive examples of this phenomenon and evidently aren't aware that you were doing it. So when you referred to "contamination" in reference to your view of my beliefs about minority students, it was just a figure of speech? And didn't mean you were calling me racist? What DID it mean? Or when you referred to "little whities," that, too, was another figure of speech? Any fair reading of our exchange would reveal your default position, which is to imply my disagreement with you over the Finnish model, or any reference to our problems in inner city schools, is racist.
As to cowardice, you are the one who suggested several times there are "many states" with not too many minoirities that are underperforming. Yet you haven't told us which ones they are. Or even named one. So you don't seem to be overly willing to "debate" either.
Your libtard pomposity, unqualified psychological posturing ("within the GOP" my a*s), and phony tears about your good faith efforts to debate are not persuasive. It is the left that spends a great deal of time and effort trying to silence views with which they disagree. And resorts to name calling when they can't shut the opposition up.
No need for any psychology here. You're a typical libtard dipstick for whom any disagreement must stem from some fundamental personal failing, the favorite of which is "racism." You larded your posts up with reflexive examples of this phenomenon and evidently aren't aware that you were doing it. So when you referred to "contamination" in reference to your view of my beliefs about minority students, it was just a figure of speech? And didn't mean you were calling me racist? What DID it mean? Or when you referred to "little whities," that, too, was another figure of speech? Any fair reading of our exchange would reveal your default position, which is to imply my disagreement with you over the Finnish model, or any reference to our problems in inner city schools, is racist.
As to cowardice, you are the one who suggested several times there are "many states" with not too many minoirities that are underperforming. Yet you haven't told us which ones they are. Or even named one. So you don't seem to be overly willing to "debate" either.
Your libtard pomposity, unqualified psychological posturing ("within the GOP" my a*s), and phony tears about your good faith efforts to debate are not persuasive. It is the left that spends a great deal of time and effort trying to silence views with which they disagree. And resorts to name calling when they can't shut the opposition up.
Last edited:
Re: Elections 2012: You must choose the lesser of two weevils
You remind me of Jabba the Hutt's pet, Salacious Crumb. All opposition or disagreement stems from some fundamental flaw. And you TRY so hard to to be tolerant. While you're prattling on about "suppression of thought" you might want to consider CREW's continuing efforts to suppress those with whom they disagree. "Fascists?" "Violent impulses?" You mean like the "violent impulses" of His Panderness' pal Bill Ayers? It is a peculiar phenomenon of libtards that they reflexively ascribe their own short comings to others, while overlooking those shortcomings in themselves. Time to look in a mirror. "Critical thinking?" "Reason?" No conservative who posts here can hold a candle to your smug, condescending arrogance.
Today is Memorial Day. While one libtard host on MSNBC has a problem referring to our fallen servicemen as heroes, I don't. Am I being "political?" Or a "retard?"
Chris Hayes has apologized.
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2012/05/28/chris-hayes-apologizes-to-soldiers
You remind me of Jabba the Hutt's pet, Salacious Crumb. All opposition or disagreement stems from some fundamental flaw. And you TRY so hard to to be tolerant. While you're prattling on about "suppression of thought" you might want to consider CREW's continuing efforts to suppress those with whom they disagree. "Fascists?" "Violent impulses?" You mean like the "violent impulses" of His Panderness' pal Bill Ayers? It is a peculiar phenomenon of libtards that they reflexively ascribe their own short comings to others, while overlooking those shortcomings in themselves. Time to look in a mirror. "Critical thinking?" "Reason?" No conservative who posts here can hold a candle to your smug, condescending arrogance.
Today is Memorial Day. While one libtard host on MSNBC has a problem referring to our fallen servicemen as heroes, I don't. Am I being "political?" Or a "retard?"
Chris Hayes has apologized.
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2012/05/28/chris-hayes-apologizes-to-soldiers
Last edited:
- Status