The party out of power always has the goal of making the incumbent a one term president.
The Dems didn't cause this crisis directly -- that's the Tea Party ...'s doing .
Few parties put a gun to the country's head to achieve it. A few have tried.The party out of power always has the goal of making the incumbent a one term president.
With all the caveman activity out here I'm curious why nobody has answered how using Medicare cuts to fund tax cuts for the rich benefits the rest of us? Also why do people over 55 get a free ride?
Thoughts?
Sorry, we've been too busy beating our wives. Have you stopped that yet?With all the caveman activity out here I'm curious why nobody has answered how using Medicare cuts to fund tax cuts for the rich benefits the rest of us? Also why do people over 55 get a free ride?
Thoughts?
What??????
The crisis occured in 2008; the TEA Party didn't even start until after Pelosi and Reid rammed the PPACA through Congress.
How can something that was not even in existence when the crisis occured be the "direct cause" of the crisis?
Wow.
I dunno about you, but we've been beating Harvard...Sorry, we've been too busy beating our wives. Have you stopped that yet?
Sorry, we've been too busy beating our wives. Have you stopped that yet?
I dunno about you, but we've been beating Harvard...
(except when it counts. I know, I know)
Meanwhile, some Republicans are worried about the effect of Ryan downticket.
What??????
The crisis occured in 2008; the TEA Party didn't even start until after Pelosi and Reid rammed the PPACA through Congress.
How can something that was not even in existence when the crisis occured be the "direct cause" of the crisis?
Wow.
I usually beat my wife up also, though on occasion she beats me up. This morning I beat her a good hour or so.I beat my wife up every morning. On weekdays, I'm out of the house before she wakes up. On weekends, since I beat her up then too, I get up first to make coffee.
um...Obama cut over $700 billion from Medicare to fund PPACA, no?
My thoughts are that you are setting up a bogus "argument" in the first place. Please show me where anyone has suggested cutting Medicare? The premium support model says take the money that is already being spent anyway and spent it more effectively. You have not explained how that equates to a "cut" when the funding level stays the same.
Also, please show me where anyone has proposed tax cuts for the rich. the proposal is that we make the tax code more growth-friendly by using revenue-neutral adjustments: there's a one-for-one trade-off between fewer deductions and lower rates, so that revenue is the same either way but one rewards productivity instead of being well-connected to a special-interest Congressman. Where is the "cut" here?
So you raise two phantoms, neither of which has been proposed, and then ask someone why your phantoms have no substance?
or are you a Democratic speechwriter testing out material?
Try again. Do you recall the debt ceiling debacle and the hostage taking of the full faith and credit of the US, brought to you by your local TP rump? That's what we're talking about here.
8-0-2 in the RS the prior 5 years, though...You certainly haven't been beating a team that spent most of the year in the basement, though...
um...Obama cut over $700 billion from Medicare to fund PPACA, no?
My thoughts are that you are setting up a bogus "argument" in the first place. Please show me where anyone has suggested cutting Medicare? The premium support model says take the money that is already being spent anyway and spent it more effectively. You have not explained how that equates to a "cut" when the funding level stays the same.
Also, please show me where anyone has proposed tax cuts for the rich. the proposal is that we make the tax code more growth-friendly by using revenue-neutral adjustments: there's a one-for-one trade-off between fewer deductions and lower rates, so that revenue is the same either way but one rewards productivity instead of being well-connected to a special-interest Congressman. Where is the "cut" here?
So you raise two phantoms, neither of which has been proposed, and then ask someone why your phantoms have no substance?
or are you a Democratic speechwriter testing out material?
How did this become about Palin?This is what happens when the attention whores want you to believe that they're victims.
How did this become about Palin?
Sorry, we've been too busy beating our wives. Have you stopped that yet?
Not the RNC, though. They sure as heck weren't interested in having her speak at their convention.Isn't she the poster child for the Tea Party? It's always been about her.