Ou there’s apps? lol I’ve had them for years. You need conditions to be right- namely no light pollution and no clouds.
go yell at the people who actually pooped on the totality and quit ****ting on me.
Most crappy sunglasses you pick up at the drug store block 97 or 98% of the light. On a dark night, the human eye can detect a match lighting at 50 miles.The sun is insanely bright, and even at 7% it's plenty to light things up. Crazy, isn't it?
lol, I’m not trying to convince anyone of anything. I’m very, very sorry I shared any opinion and I’ll notate for the future that northern lights aren’t cool and can be seen nearly every day by everyoneOk. But please don't try to convince people that Northern Lights are better than a total solar eclipse. That's what you suggested in your original post about northern lights. I've seen both, and they are both amazing and spectacular, and completely different. As I've posted, not the same.
BTW, maybe a trip to the Lake Superior shore line may increase your odds.
Most crappy sunglasses you pick up at the drug store block 97 or 98% of the light. On a dark night, the human eye can detect a match lighting at 50 miles.
Completely agree… totality was cool even with the unfortunate conditions in Rochester. It was amazing how quickly it got significantly darker as soon as totality hit, almost as if that last 0.01% makes a difference (and it DOES!).Even 98% covering is nothing compared to complete totality. And people just don't seem to understand that. Even with 2% of the sunlight, it's enough to maintain daylight.
Even with a complete cloud cover, 100% totality here was something to experience (and I experienced a few sunny day partial eclipses). As others have told me and I will tell them, 98% is a million times less interesting than 100%. It's not even close.
To experience complete nightfall in the middle of the day for a few minutes and then the light "pop" back up, was quite fascinating. And eerie.
Huge disappointment though not actually see the moon/sun. Never even used my glasses because I didn't see anything.
On a dark night, the human eye can detect a match lighting at 50 miles.
After witnessing my second total eclipse in less than seven years under perfect conditions, it never ceases to amaze me how small the sun actually is in our sky.
Within 5 miles of entering the interstate, the suspect fired multiple shots into another vehicle traveling along the interstate, striking the passing car multiple times.
The driver was struck by glass fragments from the window and grazed on the arm by a bullet; however, he was able to steer his vehicle onto the shoulder of the road, away from the suspect.
Just remember, partial <<<<<<<< total. Until you see the corona and some solar flares (which I didn't expect), don't be so certain that you think it will be "meh".
After witnessing my second total eclipse in less than seven years under perfect conditions, it never ceases to amaze me how small the sun actually is in our sky.
C'mon. Folks really need to understand this eclipse thing.
Even 98% covering is nothing compared to complete totality. And people just don't seem to understand that. Even with 2% of the sunlight, it's enough to maintain daylight.
Even with a complete cloud cover, 100% totality here was something to experience (and I experienced a few sunny day partial eclipses). As others have told me and I will tell them, 98% is a million times less interesting than 100%. It's not even close.
To experience complete nightfall in the middle of the day for a few minutes and then the light "pop" back up, was quite fascinating. And eerie.
Huge disappointment though not actually see the moon/sun. Never even used my glasses because I didn't see anything.
So you must've seen the one in 2017? We traveled from NH to South Carolina for that one. Was a bit cloudy but was able to see totality briefly then the diamond ring etc after. This
one was spectacular from the banks of Lake Champlain. Australia 2028???
That is a great stat.