You knew this thread was coming someday...
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32735349/ns/us_news-crime_and_courts/
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32735349/ns/us_news-crime_and_courts/
You knew this thread was coming someday...
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32735349/ns/us_news-crime_and_courts/
That's not very funny...A 14-month old girl is dead...
Yet a few Wisconsin rubes digging up a corpse and having sex with it is downright hilarious...![]()
I don't really see the comparison, but okay.
Yet a few Wisconsin rubes digging up a corpse and having sex with it is downright hilarious...![]()
Touche. Murdering a one year child is very similar.
Or a dead deer..
Not that the other is less tasteful, but I found it funny in the fact that some people actually wanted to go have sex with a dead person.
No no no. Taking time out of your busy weekend to boink a farm/wild animal/dead person is just like beating a small child with a baseball bat.
I don't believe that's what I implied. I was referring to the laughable selective righteousness, not trying to say the acts are identical. Both are freaking absurd, and to find humor in one and not the other is hypocritical.
If the acts are not identical, then why the hypocrisy?
1. a child is murdered. Not funny.
2. a person wants to have sex with a dead animal/person. Funny. The desire, not the act itself.
Sorry man, bestial necrophiliacs are much funnier than a man taking a bat to 14 mo baby. And I don't particularly like babies.I don't believe that's what I implied. I was referring to the laughable selective righteousness, not trying to say the acts are identical. Both are freaking absurd, and to find humor in one and not the other is hypocritical.
Don't argue, Brent. The more I think about it, I think murdering a child is way funnier than boinking a deer. XYZ brings up an excellent point. Two cheers for batting practice. Especially with composite bats.
2. a person wants to have sex with a dead animal/person. Funny. The desire, not the act itself.
Well then we've located where we, apparently all, differ.![]()
The defendant told Duluth police he slashed the rubber balls to satisfy a sexual urge. His fetish has led to other brushes with the law. He was convicted in 2005 of first-degree criminal damage to property after getting into the Sports and Health Center at the University of Minnesota Duluth on several occasions and damaging inflatable exercise balls.