What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Detroit Tigers, Volume 2 - The Charlie Gehringer version

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Detroit Tigers, Volume 2 - The Charlie Gehringer version

Aaaand here's the Opening Day lineup:

1. Austin Jackson, CF
2. Brennan Boesch, RF
3. Miguel Cabrera, 3B
4. Prince Fielder, 1B
5. Delmon Young, LF
6. Ryan Raburn, DH
7. Jhonny Peralta, SS
8. Alex Avila, C
9. Ramon Santiago, 2B

Justin Verlander, SP
 
Re: Detroit Tigers, Volume 2 - The Charlie Gehringer version

Hammer said:
Keep in mind we ate $13 million for 2 year's worth of Damian Easley's salary a few years ago, and we paid about that much for Gary Sheffield to stay home as well. Dave Dombrowski has shown that he is clearly not afraid to cut a player and deal with the dead money.

As for season predictions, this team clearly has deficiencies. The defense in general is below average, and both Verlander and Fister will have drop-offs from last year's performances. I do think Porcello and Scherzer will take a step forward, and the 5th starter will be a wash. I do not expect Peralta (and Avila, for that matter) to have the year he did last year, but that will be more than offset by having Delmon, Cabrera and Fielder in the heart of the order, assuming everyone stays reasonably healthy and Cabrera can prevent baseballs from bouncing off of his eye sockets on a regular basis.

Regarding the rest of the division, I think the Tigers win this by default. Cleveland gave away two starters that would have helped them in the near future, and I'm not sold that Ubaldo's elbow is healthy. I would have said that Kansas City, of all teams, could have finished 2nd, but Soria just had Tommy John, and I think they're still short on starting pitching. However, they're closer to contending than we all think. Minnesota will be improved, but that may only mean 75 wins. Chicago will finish last this year. Predicted order of finish:

Detroit
Cleveland
Kansas City
Minnesota
Chicago

94-88, we win the division by 8-12 games. Pray for Mike Ilitch's health, because this franchise is likely headed straight to hell on a rocket sled when he passes.
Click to expand...

I think you mean 94-68, although it may take 182 games to win 94 this season, IMO.

Can't argue with your logic as far as the division. I think, by looking at the schedule, the Tigers will get tested right out of the gate in April, with 9 games against the Eastern division (Boston-(3) only home games this season w/ 7! at Fenway later and Tampa (3) at home and NY (3) on the road) and 7 games against the western division (Texas, Seattle-all at home) and 7 games against the central, (CWS/KC- 6A 1 H since the other 2 games of that series vs. KC fall into May). No Ozzie this year, so you can't count on the pale hose cocking up games based on that. I also think KC is a pain the rear and could prove to be better than you think. That team can rake. I hate Cleveland just because and I think Minnesota will also surprise you because of their manager.

That's 23 games folks- 14 at CoPa and 9 away-with the weather probably cancelling some of them out- let's say they go 13-8 in April. Would that satisfy anyone here?
 
Re: Detroit Tigers, Volume 2 - The Charlie Gehringer version

I blame that one squarely on tax season. :D

If we go any better than 13-8 in April, we might run away and hide with a 15-game lead by the All Star break. If this team struggles at all, people are going to go ape****. Those people should be beaten with a shovel. If we're a few games above .500 a month from now, we're just fine. As long as we don't start out 2-12 or something heinous like that, I still think we're fine.

As for the division:
Chicago just doesn't have much talent and not much in the farm system.

Minnesota has a long way to go to get back to where they were. They're not losing 99 again, but I don't see them touching 85 wins, either.

Cleveland has too many question marks and injuries to take them seriously. They completely face-planted after a 30-15 start last year, and anyone that thinks Sizemore and Hafner are going to be healthy and contribute are drinking the same paint thinner I was when I did my little math problem you pointed out.

Kansas City is getting good quick, fast, and in a hurry, but Soria is out for the season, and they're counting on too much young starting pitching this season. I don't think it's going to happen, but I wouldn't be overly shocked to see them finish 2nd this year. 2013 may very well be a completely different matter for them.

Oh, and get ready for a lot of long games with this team. I mean 3:30-4:00 games.
 
Last edited:
Re: Detroit Tigers, Volume 2 - The Charlie Gehringer version

Hammer said:
I blame that one squarely on tax season. :D

If we go any better than 13-8 in April, we might run away and hide with a 15-game lead by the All Star break. If this team struggles at all, people are going to go ape****. Those people should be beaten with a shovel. If we're a few games above .500 a month from now, we're just fine. As long as we don't start out 2-12 or something heinous like that, I still think we're fine.

As for the division:
Chicago just doesn't have much talent and not much in the farm system.

Minnesota has a long way to go to get back to where they were. They're not losing 99 again, but I don't see them touching 85 wins, either.

Cleveland has too many question marks and injuries to take them seriously. They completely face-planted after a 30-15 start last year, and anyone that thinks Sizemore and Hafner are going to be healthy and contribute are drinking the same paint thinner I was when I did my little math problem you pointed out.

Kansas City is getting good quick, fast, and in a hurry, but Soria is out for the season, and they're counting on too much young starting pitching this season. I don't think it's going to happen, but I wouldn't be overly shocked to see them finish 2nd this year. 2013 may very well be a completely different matter for them.

Oh, and get ready for a lot of long games with this team. I mean 3:30-4:00 games.
Click to expand...

Tax season has its place in He^^.

As far as that shovel, let me have it when you're done. I'll do the burying if you do the hitting. ;)

I'll preface my comments below with this: if the team stays healthy, they could match last season's 95 wins. I suspect that we will no doubt have some concerns, especially with defense and at times, pitching. I am hoping that the lineup contributes offensively other than the boppers. Either way- with 88 wins or more, they should win the division. It's time to take the next step, though, considering our ace is in his prime. Losing VMart is a bigger blow than some people think, though.
 
Re: Detroit Tigers, Volume 2 - The Charlie Gehringer version

Boston @ Detroit in Game 1 is underway!

Break a leg Delmon! No really. :mad:
 
Re: Detroit Tigers, Volume 2 - The Charlie Gehringer version

I miss Prince from the Brewers, but boy am I glad he landed in Detroit. Batting 1.000 so far, and was NOT the cause of a double play (yet). :D
 
Re: Detroit Tigers, Volume 2 - The Charlie Gehringer version

Way to go, Big Potato. Blown save...
 
Re: Detroit Tigers, Volume 2 - The Charlie Gehringer version

Thank you Austin Jackson! Tigers 3 : 2 BoSox
 
Re: Detroit Tigers, Volume 2 - The Charlie Gehringer version

aygwm2 said:
Way to go, Big Potato. Blown save...
Click to expand...

Remember I said it first: "And let's get the blown save out of the way early for the Big Taco so he can resume being a decent closer."

Torques me off that he wins and JV doesn't, but a win is a win.
 
Re: Detroit Tigers, Volume 2 - The Charlie Gehringer version

streaker said:
Torques me off that he wins and JV doesn't, but a win is a win.
Click to expand...

ditto, I'm ****ed that "the fat JV" gets credit for the W, that number could mean something in the record books by the end of this year. I mean, 8 shutout innings for no decision? sucks.
 
Re: Detroit Tigers, Volume 2 - The Charlie Gehringer version

The Tigers are one Bruce Chen start away from a full game lead on everyone else in the division.
 
Re: Detroit Tigers, Volume 2 - The Charlie Gehringer version

Hammer said:
Terry Foster needs to go back to writing stories about how he's trying to stop being a fatass

For the record, I have no problem with Leyland's move bringing in Valverde. If we don't hit into about 37 double plays this isn't even an issue. I suspect that problem will take care of itself shortly as well.
Click to expand...

I have no problem with it, either- unless your big money closer coughs away a 2 run lead and blows a win for your ace. Lester and Beckett are no slouches either, so I suspect that being in that position to close the game out shouldn't fall on the offense. Do the job and this is a non topic.

As for Foster, he and his radio partner are unlistenable. Probably just on opposite ends of the opinion to stir interest as usual.
 
Re: Detroit Tigers, Volume 2 - The Charlie Gehringer version

This early in the year, bringing in Valverde was the right move.

If you want outside verification, Philly pulled Halladay after 92 pitches and a 1-0 lead the very same day. You don't need your ace throwing 125 pitches opening day in 40 degree weather when he's thrown maybe 200 pitches in spring training.
 
Re: Detroit Tigers, Volume 2 - The Charlie Gehringer version

Two homers for Cabrera and Fielder, and one from Avila off Josh Beckett. I think it's going to be a fun year.
 
Re: Detroit Tigers, Volume 2 - The Charlie Gehringer version

Just tuned into today's game. Fister out after only 3.2 innings...anyone know why?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top