What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Days Since Last Mass Shooting: 0

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Days Since Last Mass Shooting: 0

Seems like the gun lobby consistently suggests some work on mental health issues.

But I've never seen that suggestion followed by any hard ideas to do something.

Curious.

Yes, it's a person who is pulling the trigger- so what should be done??? What concrete thing can be done to prevent people from even attempting mass murders?

Or should we just deal with this as a part of life?
 
Re: Days Since Last Mass Shooting: 0

4. This concerns me. I'm big on "due process of law" and the no-fly list has a history and track record not so great on due process.
5. Sure, but be careful what you wish for. It might not be the guns. It might be the people.
8. Every gun today is sold with a lock. I'm big on safe handling and storage. But I don't want the cops to have a warrantless search to check that my safe is locked.

4 and 8: I share the civil liberties concerns and they should be reflected in the rules.

5. Hey, it may be the weather. But let's find out. Banning the research was a truly cynical maneuver, and it kinda cries out "let's burn down the observatory."
 
Re: Days Since Last Mass Shooting: 0

I'd do the following:

1) Ban all guns that can fire more than 10 rounds before reloading. Simply put people have no chance to run/overwhelm the shooter if he can keep blasting away uninterrupted.
2) Anybody with documented mental health issues or is under criminal or terrorism investigation is put on hold from owning a gun. If you ARE under investigation, gun must be stored off your premise (like at a gun club, etc).
3) Every gun sales private or public goes through check. Anybody who goes around this law and sells a gun used in a crime can be held partially liable.

But, lets call it like we see it. Either the American people 1) elect a Congress that will enact gun control legislation, or 2) elects a Congress that blocks it and these massacres will keep happening. Simply put its a choice voters are making this election on this issue. Divided govt = nothing gets done so you're happy with status quo.
 
Re: Days Since Last Mass Shooting: 0

An AR-15 is semi-automatic (one trigger pull = one round fired) just like a semi-automatic handgun.
A fully automatic weapon is illegal (save for some very specific licensing/ownership criteria).
Modifying a semi- to full auto is illegal.

The 10 round proposal is fine for handguns.

Maybe one can limit the magazine size to the energy (weight + charge) of a magazine. 10 rounds of 45 cal would a reasonable start.
 
Re: Days Since Last Mass Shooting: 0

Do rifles generally shoot heavier bullets at faster speeds and with more accuracy than handguns?

Do rifles generally have larger clips than handguns?

A car and a semi both have internal combustion engines, but there is a reason we require a more stringent license to drive a semi.

Rifle rounds tend to be smaller caliber (diameter) than handgun rounds. Most rifles are 5.56 mm (.223 caliber) or 7.62 mm (.30 caliber). Most handguns are above .30 caliber. (Note the words "most" and "tend" as I'm speaking in gereralizations.)

Rifles do generally have higher muzzle velocities and better accuracy (because of the longer barrel).

The average hunting rifle has a small magazine ("clips" are for paper). My (.40 caliber) handgun has 11 or 16 round magazines. The 9 mm version has 13 or 19 round magazines. Those are illegal in CA (yet San Bernadino happened).

And a drunk can get behind the wheel of a car or a semi.
 
2. Uh, go and buy a gun today. The store owner (the FFL) has to call the FBI and get a sale to you approved.
In the State of Alaska, and I'm sure many others, it is perfectly legal to buy or sell a firearm to/from anyone in a private sale with absolutely no background check performed.
 
Re: Days Since Last Mass Shooting: 0

In the State of Alaska, and I'm sure many others, it is perfectly legal to buy or sell a firearm to/from anyone in a private sale with absolutely no background check performed.

I'll probably get called a whatever, but I won't sell (or give) a firearm to someone I don't know and trust. I wish everyone had that mindset.
 
Re: Days Since Last Mass Shooting: 0

That makes for a nice sound bite, but what laws have been passed in the wake of any of the mass shootings? The last gun bill I can recall is the Brady bill, and that took six years to pass (introduced in 87, signed into law in 93).

I think the point is we don't pass any laws, or do anything else, because the NRA owns Congress (or at least the party that currently controls Congress).
I just saw a report on a study about this. I can't be positive, but I think it came out of Harvard. They studied the impact of mass shootings on follow up legislation pertaining to gun control.

The reason it seems like there hasn't been legislation passed since the Brady bill is that almost all gun regulation is local, from state legislative bills on down. Things that are happening in Ohio don't make their way out to where we live until something gets appealed to the SCOTUS.

As I recall the results of the study, they found there is a substantial increase in the amount of legislation authored following mass shootings. Obviously, they don't pass a majority of the laws, but a significant number do get passed.

The only reason that I remember the study is that one of their other findings is that there is an uptick in legislation introduced both for and against tighter controls. In other words, it may be equally likely that the "gotta pass a law" crowd seeks to make it easier to get a permit or buy a weapon.

Again, another side effect of our reaction to always pass a law in response to every event that occurs.

I don't recall that the study provided any sort of list of state or local laws passed in response to mass shootings, but if I can find the report again and it has such a list, I'll link to it.
 
Re: Days Since Last Mass Shooting: 0

Others have replied on their issues, so I'll not rehash them, only add that the No-Fly list provision would be a no-go from the start because the No-Fly list is known to be highly flawed. There are babies - terryifying and mean infants - on that list because they have the misfortune of sharing a name with someone else who's on the list. It's horribly flawed.

Didnt stop Florida from using similar list to purge their voter rolls...
 
Re: Days Since Last Mass Shooting: 0

The FBI had this guano loco jamoke on the radar since 2013.
The FBI knew about Mohammed Atta and his band of box cutters.

Is the FBI incompetent or impotent.
 
Re: Days Since Last Mass Shooting: 0

This facility in Orlando: I've heard from a bunch of witnesses and folks there (interviewed on TV) that there was only one way in and out. (Uh, fire code anyone?)

Knowing that, the terrorist could've easily chosen an incendiary device as his weapon of choice and caused as much or more harm. (See: Seattle, 2013)

On the last day of 2013, a man later identified as Musab Mohammed Masmari attempted to set off a crude firebomb in the entrance of the popular Capitol Hill (Seattle) nightclub, which was packed with more than 750 people celebrating the new year. Only the quick actions of employees who smelled smoke averted disaster, according to police and federal prosecutors.

Masmari was a Muslim who had expressed disgust of gays, according to court records.

But the problem is ... guns?
 
Last edited:
Re: Days Since Last Mass Shooting: 0

The FBI had this guano loco jamoke on the radar since 2013.
The FBI knew about Mohammed Atta and his band of box cutters.

Is the FBI incompetent or impotent.

What were they supposed to do exactly? Being on the radar doesnt mean they can just charge him with something...pesky Bill of Rights and all.

Why was he allowed to purchase a gun when he was on the FBIs radar? I will give you a clue it isnt because of the FBIs incompetence...I am sure you have a cool talking point for that though.
 
This facility in Orlando: I've heard from a bunch of witnesses and folks there (interviewed on TV) that there was only one way in and out. (Uh, fire code anyone?)

Knowing that, the terrorist could've easily chosen an incendiary device as his weapon of choice and caused as much or more harm. (See: Seattle, 2013)



But the problem is ... guns?

Well, it would appear that guns are the more reliable method of attack, wouldn't it?
 
Re: Days Since Last Mass Shooting: 0

What were they supposed to do exactly? Being on the radar doesnt mean they can just charge him with something...pesky Bill of Rights and all.

Not to mention that he may have been tagged because of Dear Old Dad.

The fact that he passed two different FBI investigations suggests that he was crazier than he was anything else, and there was nothing to suggest he was going to go all family values on the gays.

If believing wildly hateful, ignorant, and crazy things about LGBTers was actionable, half the South would be in a holding cell.
 
Re: Days Since Last Mass Shooting: 0

But the problem is ... guns?

Guns is one problem.

But where do you start with this one? Religious extremism, hatred of gays, easily accessible assault weapons and high capacity magazines? All are components of the problem, but only one is off limits thanks to the NRA.
 
Re: Days Since Last Mass Shooting: 0

Didnt stop Florida from using similar list to purge their voter rolls...

So your lesson from that is to repeat our past mistakes because they'll never come back to bite us in the arse for a third time after the first and second?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top