Surprising to see a hardcore Trumper advocating for government run healthcare.
And of course an elementary response.
To think there are people that are actually rooting for certain Countries, States, ect. to experience more harm and/or death based on what fits their political dogma. Versus looking at what different places have done and looking to draw good information and conclusions. Of course you don't want to go there, hence the route you chose to go with your amateur response.
Also, it doesn't take much government and bureaucracy to institute an approach currently like Sweden's now does it?
In regards to their health care system you might want to read up just a bit.
Sweden is divided into 290 municipalities and 21 regional councils. Swedish healthcare is decentralised – responsibility lies with the regional councils and, in some cases, local councils or municipal governments. This is regulated by the Health and Medical Service Act. The role of the central government is to establish principles and guidelines, and to set the political agenda for health and medical care.
Regional councils are political bodies whose representatives are elected by region residents every four years on the same day as national general elections.
First off, Sweden is the population Size of MN&WI. Secondly, within that they are very deregulated down to what we would call cities which is not good for massive Bureaucracy. Are you advocating for each State to have much more control over their healthcare? Because that would be much more in line with the Sweden model.
Your Human Political Lords that you worship would never institute a system like Sweden's. That would require them (politicians) and titans of the health care industry, voluntarily giving up massive amounts of power, influence and $.
Sweden spends about 11% GDP on healthcare and the US about 17%.