To the individual I posted to last night... You say I have to be "certifiably nuts" if a 8-9 month lock-down is my answer. Considering I presented an answer to the biggest push back to that idea -- "you'll destroy the economy". Then all that's left to push back on is that people are simply too **** selfish and don't put the needs of the many ahead of the needs of the few or the one. They absolutely can't be prevented from going to the beach, or going to the range to shoot their AR-15s, or ride their 4 wheelers, or attend a Dump rally. Please provide at least three specific/detailed reasons why it's certifiably crazy to do lock-downs for 8-9 months as long as we keep the economy from going completely in the tank economically. And no, the number of ancillary deaths from other causes being so much higher doesn't fly as a reason because the vast majority of those are a result of increased anxiety regarding their financial situations. But, since my plan removes that issue, that likely reduces those extra deaths significantly.
Also, despite as hard as the stock market was hit, I don't think the actual economy ever went how I define as being completely in the tank. Was losing the number of jobs we did very bad? Absolutely. But, it didn't go into the tank completely. Again, any significant economic anxiety is addressed by my plan. I do appreciate you sharing the Tweet which links to the WHO video stating they now believe that there is very little transmission from asymptomatic people. Obviously, if it's true that could really be a game changer. In many ways. I truly hope it is. However, I find it interesting that someone like you who has been raging at the inconsistencies of the various scientists, experts, and research organizations -- especially the WHO -- is now so willing to cite them as a credible source. Funny how they're now credible since they're stating something that helps support "your" narrative.