Kepler
Si certus es dubita
Re: Cops 2: Pay No Attention to the Rioters Behind the Curtain
Sometimes the jokes just write themselves.
delivering pious lectures
Sometimes the jokes just write themselves.
delivering pious lectures
Said story made front page of WaPo.Engage tinfoil hats.
Anon family member of a Balt officer coming forward. She's a sista. Gray allegedly injuring himself (or trying to). Alleged criminal (prisoner) saying the same story. This is a mess. This will not end well. I know what I want to believe, but right now...I think the cop(s) were in the wrong. I hope that *I* am the one in the wrong.
Engage tinfoil hats.
Anon family member of a Balt officer coming forward. She's a sista. Gray allegedly injuring himself (or trying to). Alleged criminal (prisoner) saying the same story. This is a mess. This will not end well. I know what I want to believe, but right now...I think the cop(s) were in the wrong. I hope that *I* am the one in the wrong.
Said story made front page of WaPo.
Another story blames lead paint.
Sometimes the jokes just write themselves.
It's abuse of the poors. Race just handily color-codes them.
I for one am absolutely shocked that when you treat the poors like garbage and siphon them into ghettoized neighborhoods with terrible schools from which they have no effective means of meeting their own needs or garnering formal political support to assist them, some of them resort to violence. That's just so tacky.
Sometimes the jokes just write themselves.
Wow, I never thought you would reject the legacy of Great Society programs!
The first time listed is under Reagan, the second time listed is under Clinton.Guess again, friend.
Poverty craters through the years of the New Deal and Great Society.
It's first significant and protracted increase begins in 1981.
It's next protracted decrease starts in 1993.
It's next significant and protracted increase begins in 2000.
But I'm sure all of that historical data is just a coincidence.
Policies designed solely to benefit the 1% consistently increase the number of Americans in poverty; policies to ameliorate poverty decrease it. Shocker.
The first time listed is under Reagan, the second time listed is under Clinton.
The ever-changing narrative:
http://www.wjla.com/articles/2015/0...s-result-of-police-who-arrested-him-prob.html
Read it carefully. The first is an increase. The seconds is a decrease.
Read it carefully. The first is an increase. The seconds is a decrease.
The ever-changing narrative:
http://www.wjla.com/articles/2015/0...s-result-of-police-who-arrested-him-prob.html
Guess again, friend.
Poverty craters through the years of the New Deal and Great Society.
It's first significant and protracted increase begins in 1981.
It's next protracted decrease starts in 1993.
It's next significant and protracted increase begins in 2000.
But I'm sure all of that historical data is just a coincidence.
Policies designed solely to benefit the 1% consistently increase the number of Americans in poverty; policies to ameliorate poverty decrease it. Shocker.
I can't quite put my finger on it, but there seems to be some sort of connection between those dates. But I just can't seem to see it right now.
I can't quite put my finger on it, but there seems to be some sort of connection between those dates. But I just can't seem to see it right now.
As for the tinfoil hat self-injury...how could one actually prove that? Is forensics good enough? I doubt they are good enough to find if it was self-inflicted or not. Right now, I'm tossing it aside as nothing but click-bait. Again, I hope I'm wrong.