walrus
Wind up workin' in a gas station
http://www.komonews.com/news/local/96353934.html
I think the guy lost it but the girl is hindering the arrest.
I think the guy lost it but the girl is hindering the arrest.
http://www.komonews.com/news/local/96353934.html
I think the guy lost it but the girl is hindering the arrest.
http://www.komonews.com/news/local/96353934.html
I think the guy lost it but the girl is hindering the arrest.
Having been there and done that -- the officer showed amazing restraint while trying to arrest the woman in the blue top. He could have used much more force in trying to subdue her and would have been justified in doing so.
Seriously? Who hands out jaywalking citations unless the jaywalking caused an accident?
???However, its not appropriate to shoot a 14 yo in the head for running away.
Seriously? Who hands out jaywalking citations unless the jaywalking caused an accident?
???
That's not why the kid got shot.
Every report for that incident involved a large group of people throwing rocks at an officer.
Every report? That makes one...the one supplied by the border guards themselves before it was known there was video of the incidence.
And indeed, the video refutes the border guards report (the position of CNN and a handful of other media outlets that have the video) and per CNN, shows that the kid was running further into Mexico.
IMO its appropriate to use necessary but basic force to secure justice as was done in Seattle...its not to kill someone to eliminate any chance of that justice.
Isn't death a form of justice?
That's nice in a law classroom, but on the streets, the cops have the right - the duty, even - to protect themselves. If they tell a suspect at a drug bust to freeze, and the guy reaches inside his jacket, then in my book they would be perfectly justified in shooting him. I don't care if it turns out the guy was reaching for a breath mint - in my mind, that's an appropriate use of force.Its only justice if both the punishment matches the crime...and there is a process to determine whether it does or not. When you subscribe to innocent until proven guilty, justice does not mean killing someone before they can be judged. In addition, in this case there is the whole question of whether the punishment of death matched the crime.
It sounds like you would claim that there is no situation at all where it's okay for a cop to kill someone, since that person wouldn't have been sentenced by a judge and jury prior to the killing.
The only question I have on this is did the policeman seem to lack some training in proper arm restraints? or perhaps he was afraid of hurting the original girl? Maybe SteveP or others that have had law enforcement experience can answer this better....