FlagDUDE08
Banned
Re: Convention junkies can obsess details here!
Scooby said to answer my question of "Then why, when you are on unemployment, are you no longer required to submit proof of submitting two job application forms each week, whether paper or electronic?", and I quote: "Those exceptions were asked for by Republican Governors. You'll have to ask them." Also, Scooby mentioned in the article he quoted that there is a provision that these states must increase their work force. Where is the proof of that? Calling out a specific party for purposes of branding is just plain sickening.
Look, I don't hold water for anyone who claims to be part of a specific party. If they do something stupid, I'll call them out on it. All of these governors, regardless of party, did something stupid by trying to legislate against human nature. Any human is only going to do work out of one of two reasons: necessity (i.e. don't work don't eat), or self pride. The second does not happen with high probability, and even then, it typically is provoked by another desire to make yourself textbook-worthy (e.g. the Buffett rule). If someone doesn't have to work and receives what equates to them as being a free lunch, of course they're going to take it. If you don't have to actually look for work in order to receive unemployment benefits, then why would you?
Scooby said to answer my question of "Then why, when you are on unemployment, are you no longer required to submit proof of submitting two job application forms each week, whether paper or electronic?", and I quote: "Those exceptions were asked for by Republican Governors. You'll have to ask them." Also, Scooby mentioned in the article he quoted that there is a provision that these states must increase their work force. Where is the proof of that? Calling out a specific party for purposes of branding is just plain sickening.
Look, I don't hold water for anyone who claims to be part of a specific party. If they do something stupid, I'll call them out on it. All of these governors, regardless of party, did something stupid by trying to legislate against human nature. Any human is only going to do work out of one of two reasons: necessity (i.e. don't work don't eat), or self pride. The second does not happen with high probability, and even then, it typically is provoked by another desire to make yourself textbook-worthy (e.g. the Buffett rule). If someone doesn't have to work and receives what equates to them as being a free lunch, of course they're going to take it. If you don't have to actually look for work in order to receive unemployment benefits, then why would you?
so I was clicking) into the speech. 