What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Completely Unwoven: Business, Economics, and Tax Policy 4.0

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Completely Unwoven: Business, Economics, and Tax Policy 4.0

So, uh, it sounds like Apple is ditching the Lightning connector for USB-C on the iPHone 8. :eek:

I didn't see that coming.

And it's apparently going to have an option for a curved OLED screen on the high-end model made by Samsung. :eek: :eek:


My $0.02: I hate curved screens. I hate everything about them.
 
Last edited:
Re: Completely Unwoven: Business, Economics, and Tax Policy 4.0

So, uh, it sounds like Apple is ditching the Lightning connector for USB-C on the iPHone 8. :eek:

I didn't see that coming.

I guess they think they're strong enough now not to have to imprison their install base.

By that logic, Microsoft should be introducing a proprietary power connector soon. ;)
 
So, uh, it sounds like Apple is ditching the Lightning connector for USB-C on the iPHone 8. :eek:

I didn't see that coming.

And it's apparently going to have an option for a curved OLED screen on the high-end model made by Samsung. :eek: :eek:


My $0.02: I hate curved screens. I hate everything about them.

Not at all surprising. Their upper management is a joke ever since Jobs kicked the bucket. No innovation or vision at all, just happy to collect profits from hipster d-bags, and Boomers who think Android is too difficult to figure out.
 
Re: Completely Unwoven: Business, Economics, and Tax Policy 4.0

I dunno. Moving away from proprietary and having a competitor (the competitor) make your screens take some serious balls even if it's not innovative.
 
Re: Completely Unwoven: Business, Economics, and Tax Policy 4.0

That takes balls when it comes to the largest company on earth. Whether you acknowledge it or not.
 
Re: Completely Unwoven: Business, Economics, and Tax Policy 4.0


Interwebs. 8% of total sales are ecommerce and that falls squarely into Targets demo. Years ago, these companies needed to take over some of the top online players. Its probably too late for that strategy. Now they need to rely on suppliers to help differentiate themselves.
 
Re: Completely Unwoven: Business, Economics, and Tax Policy 4.0

Start announcing you'll allow "transsexual" pedophiles into any bathroom or fitting room, your profits SHOULD go down. Just like when you announced you're a "gun-free zone".
 
Re: Completely Unwoven: Business, Economics, and Tax Policy 4.0

Start announcing you'll allow "transsexual" pedophiles into any bathroom or fitting room, your profits SHOULD go down. Just like when you announced you're a "gun-free zone".

When did Target announce that it was welcoming pedophiles? Oh, that's right, Target Stores have never once said that they're trying to corner the pedophile market.

Target's policy towards transsexuals is the same as every other national chains' policies, only Target had the integrity to simply state it publicly.
 
Re: Completely Unwoven: Business, Economics, and Tax Policy 4.0

When did Target announce that it was welcoming pedophiles? Oh, that's right, Target Stores have never once said that they're trying to corner the pedophile market.

Target's policy towards transsexuals is the same as every other national chains' policies, only Target had the integrity to simply state it publicly.

Anyone with half a brain can put two and two together. I will tip my hat towards honesty, though. Something that's quite few and far between in the business world.
 
Re: Completely Unwoven: Business, Economics, and Tax Policy 4.0

Anyone with half a brain can put two and two together. I will tip my hat towards honesty, though. Something that's quite few and far between in the business world.

So help out the quarter-brained fool, what two and two are you putting together here, is it that transsexual people have a higher rate of committing sexual assaults in public restrooms?
 
Re: Completely Unwoven: Business, Economics, and Tax Policy 4.0

So help out the quarter-brained fool, what two and two are you putting together here, is it that transsexual people have a higher rate of committing sexual assaults in public restrooms?

I believe you're trying to apply the same logical fallacy that applies when it comes to shootings that happen in gun-free zones. By saying any gender can use any bathroom, you lose one "security level" in trying to prevent heterosexual pedophilia.
 
Re: Completely Unwoven: Business, Economics, and Tax Policy 4.0

I believe you're trying to apply the same logical fallacy that applies when it comes to shootings that happen in gun-free zones.

I'm asking a genuine question. What are the two and two I'm supposed to put together?
 
Re: Completely Unwoven: Business, Economics, and Tax Policy 4.0

I'm asking a genuine question. What are the two and two I'm supposed to put together?

When a statement like that is made, although you may be trying to apply it towards transsexuals, what you're really saying is "anyone can use any bathroom", something which a number of people are obviously not tolerable of, whether it applies to only non-transsexuals or is orientation-blind, especially when it comes to younger family members, which is something we can both agree is the case. The first "security measure" is making sure the correct gender is there. Once you take that away, things become less safe.

Obviously, the only way to truly take steps towards prevention are "single-stall" water closet rooms, regardless of gender or orientation. Considering it costs too much in terms of both space and accouterments, what's the next best thing?
 
Re: Completely Unwoven: Business, Economics, and Tax Policy 4.0

When a statement like that is made, although you may be trying to apply it towards transsexuals, what you're really saying is "anyone can use any bathroom", something which a number of people are obviously not tolerable of, whether it applies to only non-transsexuals or is orientation-blind, especially when it comes to younger family members, which is something we can both agree is the case. The first "security measure" is making sure the correct gender is there. Once you take that away, things become less safe.

Obviously, the only way to truly take steps towards prevention are "single-stall" water closet rooms, regardless of gender or orientation. Considering it costs too much in terms of both space and accouterments, what's the next best thing?

So what do you say to the states that have put in place transsexual/transgender bathroom laws to permit people to use the bathroom for which they identify currently? Inquiries have been made to the various states' law enforcement agencies, and they've all said that there have been no reported incidences that a transX person has committed any such violation against another person. No violence against these transX people have been reported within restrooms, as well.

Safety concerns appear to be completely moot in those states that have enacted the permissive laws.
 
Re: Completely Unwoven: Business, Economics, and Tax Policy 4.0

So what do you say to the states that have put in place transsexual/transgender bathroom laws to permit people to use the bathroom for which they identify currently? Inquiries have been made to the various states' law enforcement agencies, and they've all said that there have been no reported incidences that a transX person has committed any such violation against another person. No violence against these transX people have been reported within restrooms, as well.

Safety concerns appear to be completely moot in those states that have enacted the permissive laws.

If a state wants to choose one way or the other, that's their prerogative, as per the 10th amendment. Doesn't mean I have to agree with it, or that I want "Aunt Flo" on the toilet...
 
Re: Completely Unwoven: Business, Economics, and Tax Policy 4.0

If a state wants to choose one way or the other, that's their prerogative, as per the 10th amendment.

Agreed. And the states that choose against it are acting out of baseless fear against those who live lives differently than the normals. The trans people do as much as they can to draw as little attention to themselves as possible because they are targets, as proved recently in New Orleans with the two trans-women killed.

If anybody's going to abuse these laws, it's the people who already do perverted things to get off, like those who hide cameras in air vent covers of bathrooms.
 
I dunno. Moving away from proprietary and having a competitor (the competitor) make your screens take some serious balls even if it's not innovative.

They already released a MacBook that was all USB-C. It makes sense for them to go all in.

They've been buying components from Samsung while suing them over patent infringement at the same time.
 
Re: Completely Unwoven: Business, Economics, and Tax Policy 4.0

I've used unisex bathrooms What's the big deal? I know of one in Quebec City that's been around for like 15+ years (two stalls plus two urinals, and a couple sinks).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top