bronconick
Yep, still here
I'm surprised they're (Michigan, OSU) willing to latch on to a 20 year agreement, though. Signing a long term deal hamstrung the ACC.
I think that’s why they’re specifically called out as the last holdouts.I'm surprised they're (Michigan, OSU) willing to latch on to a 20 year agreement, though. Signing a long term deal hamstrung the ACC.
They’re trying to negotiate higher payouts from this $2B. Which would be a pretty historic shift for the Big Ten. With the exception of temporary lower payouts for new members, the Big Ten has been equal on revenue sharing the entire time.I'm surprised they're (Michigan, OSU) willing to latch on to a 20 year agreement, though. Signing a long term deal hamstrung the ACC.
This is a professional league now. The top 4 teams can leave and join the best of the SEC and print money if they want. If you aren't Michigan, tOSU, USC or PSU then you will take what they give you and be happy with it.I don’t think that’s going to fly.
Time to simply divorce B10/SEC college football from college and call it the C-League or something. Then the rest of us can pretend it is still about education.
UNLV @ Wyoming has snow on CBSSN, if you're in to that sort of thing
But they won’t.This is a professional league now. The top 4 teams can leave and join the best of the SEC and print money if they want. If you aren't Michigan, tOSU, USC or PSU then you will take what they give you and be happy with it.
If that happens, it seals the fate of some of our donations, that’s for sure. Even still, the new deal is really shifting my thinking a LOT.They’re trying to negotiate higher payouts from this $2B. Which would be a pretty historic shift for the Big Ten. With the exception of temporary lower payouts for new members, the Big Ten has been equal on revenue sharing the entire time.