bronconick
Yep, still here
Re: College Footbal 2009: Anybody want to be in the Top 5?
And that's why they're MSU.
And that's why they're MSU.
USCHO Fan Forum
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.
College Footbal 2009: Anybody want to be in the Top 5?
- Thread starter pirate
- Start date
- Status
Re: College Footbal 2009: Anybody want to be in the Top 5?
::shakes head::
Wow.
On the plus side, now that IA-OSU game means something. That one will have be a nat'l game...
::shakes head::
Wow.
On the plus side, now that IA-OSU game means something. That one will have be a nat'l game...
P
Priceless
Guest
Re: College Footbal 2009: Anybody want to be in the Top 5?
And Miss State gets a pick-six but then run the weirdest two-point conversion ever seen. 29-20 with 3:51 left.
And Miss State gets a pick-six but then run the weirdest two-point conversion ever seen. 29-20 with 3:51 left.
P
Priceless
Guest
Re: College Footbal 2009: Anybody want to be in the Top 5?
It's the SEC. They can do anything.
How the hell can you return a interception for 120 yards? Is Miss. St. field now an extra long CFL field?
It's the SEC. They can do anything.
Spartanforlife4
Generic Catchy Message
Re: College Footbal 2009: Anybody want to be in the Top 5?
You ever just get those feelings?
I had one of those when State scored. I just knew there was too much time left.
You ever just get those feelings?
I had one of those when State scored. I just knew there was too much time left.
Fighting Sioux 23
New member
Re: College Footbal 2009: Anybody want to be in the Top 5?
It's about time Clemson wins a game like that. I know nobody cares (nor should they) about the ACC, but Clemson is in the driver's seat to win their section, and play either VTech or GTech for the ACC title...something they haven't done in a long time.
It's about time Clemson wins a game like that. I know nobody cares (nor should they) about the ACC, but Clemson is in the driver's seat to win their section, and play either VTech or GTech for the ACC title...something they haven't done in a long time.
French Rage
NICKERSON HAS [CENSORED]
Re: College Footbal 2009: Anybody want to be in the Top 5?
Woo Stanford! Sorry Bob, but you got to win the last 3.
Woo Stanford! Sorry Bob, but you got to win the last 3.
Re: College Footbal 2009: Anybody want to be in the Top 5?
13th ranked schedule according to Sagarin.
Glad I get BTN, the end of the MSU game was petty good. Just knew that MSU gave them too much time. If that DB takes away the inside and Iowa runs a fade it is an even easier TD...good execution for Iowa, tough job for that DB.
Agree with all of the Kiffin bashing, even if you don't pass, for fear of a sack or a holding call, try something to get another 5 yards. Struck me as being afraid to make the tough decision out of fear and instead went with a plan that had maybe a 20% chance of succeeding. Would have been a great time for a fake FG, probably greater chance of scoring than having the HS JV run out to try a FG...that would have been the ballsy thing to do.
Does another SEC crew get suspended for the Ala goal line fumble call?
Does anybody have a camera setup right down the goal line?? I've seen so many calls reviewed on the goal line this year but never a straight angle...almost like they want to have the ability to say "can't tell from that angle" whenever it suits them.
Frankly I was hoping for upsets all around.
What? The Sisters of the Poor weren't available?
13th ranked schedule according to Sagarin.
Glad I get BTN, the end of the MSU game was petty good. Just knew that MSU gave them too much time. If that DB takes away the inside and Iowa runs a fade it is an even easier TD...good execution for Iowa, tough job for that DB.
Agree with all of the Kiffin bashing, even if you don't pass, for fear of a sack or a holding call, try something to get another 5 yards. Struck me as being afraid to make the tough decision out of fear and instead went with a plan that had maybe a 20% chance of succeeding. Would have been a great time for a fake FG, probably greater chance of scoring than having the HS JV run out to try a FG...that would have been the ballsy thing to do.
Does another SEC crew get suspended for the Ala goal line fumble call?
Does anybody have a camera setup right down the goal line?? I've seen so many calls reviewed on the goal line this year but never a straight angle...almost like they want to have the ability to say "can't tell from that angle" whenever it suits them.
Frankly I was hoping for upsets all around.
Re: College Footbal 2009: Anybody want to be in the Top 5?
True, some sort of outcome that leaves nothing but a turd sandwich for attendence wise at all of the BCS bowls.
P
Priceless
Guest
Re: College Footbal 2009: Anybody want to be in the Top 5?
The new BCS rankings:
1. Florida, 0.9726
2. Alabama, 0.9450
3. Texas, 0.8927
4. Iowa, 0.8249
5. USC, 0.7944
6. TCU, 0.7890
7. Boise State, 0.7752
8. Cincinnati, 0.7735
9. LSU, 0.7030
10. Oregon, 0.6456
The new BCS rankings:
1. Florida, 0.9726
2. Alabama, 0.9450
3. Texas, 0.8927
4. Iowa, 0.8249
5. USC, 0.7944
6. TCU, 0.7890
7. Boise State, 0.7752
8. Cincinnati, 0.7735
9. LSU, 0.7030
10. Oregon, 0.6456
Terrierbyassociation
Fight Cancer, Wherever You Find It
Re: College Footbal 2009: Anybody want to be in the Top 5?
Link?
Link?
P
Priceless
Guest
BoomGoestheDynamite
Registered User
Re: College Footbal 2009: Anybody want to be in the Top 5?
We can't have them intruding on spaces rightfully reserved for there betters. After all with a resume like Texas, who has beaten... well, with a name like Texas they clearly deserve to be in the driver's seat for the title game.
Not really sure why Cincy fell so much in the coaches poll. Looks like thats the only reason they slid so far in the BCS poll.
We can't have them intruding on spaces rightfully reserved for there betters. After all with a resume like Texas, who has beaten... well, with a name like Texas they clearly deserve to be in the driver's seat for the title game.
Patman
Rodent of Unusual Size
Re: College Footbal 2009: Anybody want to be in the Top 5?
the excuse is going to be that their starting QB is out for surgery... but yeah, I figure its more about the rightful territory of the upper echelons.
Not really sure why Cincy fell so much in the coaches poll. Looks like thats the only reason they slid so far in the BCS poll.
the excuse is going to be that their starting QB is out for surgery... but yeah, I figure its more about the rightful territory of the upper echelons.
Re: College Footbal 2009: Anybody want to be in the Top 5?
Because they play in the Big East.
But don't worry, they'll be "proven" to be "frauds" when someone in Big East play beats them, and no one will have to worry about the possibility.
Not really sure why Cincy fell so much in the coaches poll. Looks like thats the only reason they slid so far in the BCS poll.
Because they play in the Big East.
But don't worry, they'll be "proven" to be "frauds" when someone in Big East play beats them, and no one will have to worry about the possibility.
Kepler
Cornell Big Red
Re: College Footbal 2009: Anybody want to be in the Top 5?
Yah, I've never quite understood that line of reasoning either.
Minor conference team is undefeated. The criticism is their conference is weak so they are overrated. Then they lose within conference. The critics say, "see?" Well, no... no, I don't. Intraconference results indicate nothing about interconference strength.
(Replace Big East with ECACHL and move along...)
Notre Dame at #23 in the BCS. Twist undergarment of your choice.
Yah, I've never quite understood that line of reasoning either.
Minor conference team is undefeated. The criticism is their conference is weak so they are overrated. Then they lose within conference. The critics say, "see?" Well, no... no, I don't. Intraconference results indicate nothing about interconference strength.
(Replace Big East with ECACHL and move along...)
Notre Dame at #23 in the BCS. Twist undergarment of your choice.
The Darkness
Does not work well for others
Re: College Footbal 2009: Anybody want to be in the Top 5?
If Iowa beats Ohio State at Ohio State in a couple weeks they may actually jump Texas and play for the national title. I would say that this is a scary concept, but I actually wouldn't be surprised to see Iowa beat Florida or Alabama considering the games that the two have struggling in.
More importantly if Iowa plays for a national title odds are Penn State plays in the Rose Bowl and the Big Ten sends to teams to BCS games for like the fifth year a roll or something. More importantly Penn State might actually have a chance against the Pac-10 champ (rather it's a UCS team that's not as good as it has been for the last decade or Oregon) this year.
If Iowa beats Ohio State at Ohio State in a couple weeks they may actually jump Texas and play for the national title. I would say that this is a scary concept, but I actually wouldn't be surprised to see Iowa beat Florida or Alabama considering the games that the two have struggling in.
More importantly if Iowa plays for a national title odds are Penn State plays in the Rose Bowl and the Big Ten sends to teams to BCS games for like the fifth year a roll or something. More importantly Penn State might actually have a chance against the Pac-10 champ (rather it's a UCS team that's not as good as it has been for the last decade or Oregon) this year.
- Status