What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Colgate 2022-23

Status
Not open for further replies.
The above comments by fans of other ECAC teams are much appreciated...rooting for Cornell and Q-Pac to continue winning...not much to say about the game...I thought we played pretty well in the first period, especially in the last ten minutes...it seemed that after the second Michigan goal the enormity of the task and the mental fatigue of playing one-goal game after one-goal game finally set in...I will say the 5-minute major on Alex Young was unfortunate and, although not covered well by the announcers, probably deserved...Michigan is, quite simply, a team of 4 or 5 potential Dylan Larkin's and, although they were primarily a freshman scoring team, the young frosh were seasoned veterans by March...the overall skill, skating and size IMO is tangibly higher than Harvard's (no disrespect here) and apparently this reality is the norm in the "Big Ten"...yes, the Pairwise was pretty much spot on and these schools are now the major "feeder" conference to the NHL...overall, a very good season and these young men -along with a good job of coaching - deserve a lot of credit for their resilience throughout the season...kinda wish it had been something like 8-1 (the double digits hurts), but the ECAC title was a wonderful achievement...now it's time to look to the future (player moves at this point in the season concern me), continue to move (and EXPECT to move) to narrow the gap between the elite teams and our program...it's not easy, especially where our program has limitations regarding high admission requirements, virtual non-participation in the transfer portal, etc. Thx for an exciting and successful season...GO GATE...
 
Apple2k, I, too, laughed out loud at your comment. I appreciate people being able to laugh at themselves (and their teams). Someday, hopefully, we can look back and laugh about last night’s 11-1 loss. But I think it’s too soon based on the mood in the Sheraton Four Points lobby this morning.

And GreenCoat, I totally agree with your assessment. And there is some real anxiety about the transfer portal. We shall see in due time.

Has anyone checked on our regular posters who haven’t offered their thoughts yet? The Suicide Watch expires at Midnight tonight.
 
Dutchman;n3801325]Raiders, great season. Congrats again on your second Whitelaw Cup. Much to be proud of. When it mattered, you beat the ECAC's best.

Ditto. Just want to give a shoutout to the team on a great season, no matter how it ended. Winning the ECAC title and the Whitelaw Cup is not on our itinerary most years, and this season we persevered and got up when we were knocked down. For the life of me I can't figure out how we lost to some of the bottom teams in the league when we showed this much talent in the ECAC Playoffs? I guess we learned from every sub-par game we played and it finally came together at the end.

Kudos to Coach Vaughan and the assistant coaches, trainers, etc. for the excellent jobs they did of preparing the team all season, and for the final games against tough competition. We all salute you on an amazing accomplishment.

I have to say regarding the Allentown PPL Center and the ESPN broadcast: those were terrible sight lines to see a game. I realize that the cameras have to be placed in the booths where the booths are located. But why not take into consideration good sight lines when they built the arena? Very hard to follow the action...at least for this oldtimer 8-/
 
My thoughts on this season…

I’m sad to see it end, especially the way it ended, with us running into a buzzsaw known better as Tom Brady’s alma mater. But I’m happy I got to see Colgate win an ECAC Championship and return to the NCAA tournament. I do hope this helps with recruiting in the coming years.
 
As a fan, I went from very high to very low in 6 days. All I can say is thank you to the Seniors for 4 years of commitment to excellence on the ice and in the classroom. I wish you all the best! Thanks, too, to the Coaching staff and team for bringing the Whitelaw Cup home to Hamilton!
Go ‘gate!!!!
 
iowabasedtraveler said:
Shabby, you there?
Click to expand...

I'm half here, had nothing to say, plus trouble with my posting here, all fixed. I'm with CU13, this season was exhausting. I guess it's fitting with our up down, up down season to finish the last two weekends up, then down. Such an emotional rollercoaster, couldn't sustain consistency. I wonder if the boys were exhausted and we all wanted just a little too much from them.
To me the season was bittersweet, having a hard time putting it to words.
 
I echo CU13’s thoughts on Colgate’s seniors, who hung in there despite the pandemic and all the uncertainty that came with it. I’m so happy for them that they can say that they ended their collegiate careers as ECAC champions. Well deserved.

While the Michigan game was a bitter pill to swallow, we all have to be thrilled at how this year turned out. And, of course, the question is can we keep it going for next year. Let’s hope we will still be able to compete with the top teams in our league.

And congrats to Quinnipiac for getting to the Frozen 4. I hope they win it all.
 
I was asked to post this here. With caveat that the attendance figures might not be 100% accurate I've complied the average attendance for the 12 current ECAC teams for 2001-2023:

2001-022002-032003-042004-052005-062006-072007-082008-092009-102010-112011-122012-132013-142014-152015-162016-172017-182018-192019-202021-222022-23
Brown1,4881,4991,6021,2561,2621,4851,2241,1271,2941,4741,3741,2621,4481,0111,097950861780643392797
Clarkson2,9752,7772,4962,3282,3272,5142,7342,8512,6472,2612,4492,3972,5002,4602,5832,7092,8072,7662,8202,4572,510
Colgate1,7271,8301,8861,7731,8051,7741,5771,1411,1611,0101,2941,3121,5671,5151,5991,8141,3521,2161,188797976
Cornell3,8023,8363,8363,8363,8364,2294,1914,1534,2644,1874,2384,2474,0884,1254,0223,9083,5923,5943,9792,6853,730
Dartmouth3,2533,7384,0383,7664,0163,8093,4893,4802,9352,8243,1123,3042,9272,6512,3722,5622,0402,0841,9518011,706
Harvard2,3542,0402,1162,2872,2752,3622,3812,0862,3872,3802,2242,3062,2912,1382,3852,4662,1551,9811,8051,1942,415
Princeton1,8161,9351,6371,7171,6351,3681,7021,5751,5451,5811,8582,0641,9421,9331,8511,6351,6011,8591,8061,1341,720
Quinnipiac8219219558311,8752,3742,9222,9062,6712,7082,5243,1223,4343,1233,2473,1323,0953,1233,0242,5082,968
RPI3,0233,1862,9663,1693,1283,7153,5343,2682,8593,1583,4353,1323,2553,3733,1433,0873,0132,8802,6713672,251
St. Lawrence2,5272,1802,3482,2622,2922,5012,3772,4182,2131,6461,3991,5451,6881,6581,7821,6861,5051,2068511,0051,567
Union1,7561,8531,5951,6301,7131,7941,7371,8151,8781,8862,0091,9811,9082,1061,9972,1012,0551,8541,8411,4901,844
Yale3,8043,4073,2553,1503,0953,0342,9272,9103,1243,2753,1693,1383,3433,3123,3853,0903,2103,0462,0367881,864


To make it easier to see visually I created 2 charts: one for Ivy teams and one for non-Ivy teams:

Ivy.png
wAAACH5BAEKAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAICRAEAOw==
​

Non-Ivy.png
wAAACH5BAEKAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAICRAEAOw==
​
Except for three* seasons Cornell had the best average attendance, toping 4,000 for a decade, 2006-16. Attendance dropped off for 2 seasons, 2017-19, but rebounded nicely in 2019-20. After a post-COVID season with reduced attendance it was back up this season, although it was down from the 2019-20 average.

Perhaps surprisingly, Dartmouth was the attendance leader for 2 of the seasons Cornell wasn't, was second for 5 seasons, third for 3 seasons and 4th for 2 seasons from 2001-13. This despite, as the OP stated, not making the NCAA Tournament since 1980. Since 2013 attendance as trended downward.

Another Ivy with strong attendance from 2001-19 was Yale, which only had 2 seasons averaging below 3,000, before a sharp drop off in 2019-20 and which continued downward this past season.

Harvard has middling attendance from 2001-18, fluctuating between 2,500 and 2,000, before dropping below 2,000 in 2018-19 and then lower in 2019-20. This season it rebounded nicely, back up over 2,400.

The best attendance among the non-Ivy schools has been RPI and Quinnipiac. RPI was above 3,000 for 15 of 17 seasons from 2001-18. After 2 seasons of declining attendance it dropped again this past season as much has it had from 2018-20.

Quinnipiac's attendance has been among the tops since their current arena opened in 2007, but it increased during their almost championship season and stayed above 3,000 until the 2021-22 post-COVID season, while it was just short of 3,000 this season.

The three teams with the worst attendance since 2001 have been Brown, Colgate and St. Lawrence. Brown had low, but relatively stable attendance until 2014. Since then it was been gradually dropping and has been the worst in the league the past six seasons.

Colgate also had low, but stable attendance from 2001-08, before dropping to barely over 1,000 from 2008-11, before slowing improving over the next six seasons, reaching where it was 2001-07. However, attendance dropped again through 2020 and collapsed below 1,000 in the post-COVID season, from which attendance only improved slightly this past season.

St. Lawrence likewise had stable attendance from 2001-10, before it dropped in 2010-11 and then stabilized at a new lower, level until Appleton was closed for renovations. This past season attendance returned to that level.

Sean

*In 2001-02 Yale edged out Cornell, 3,804 to 3,802
 
I asked Sean to post this attendance summary here.
It confirms my thought that the Class of 1965 Arena now draws hundreds, not thousands, on average.
Somehow, we need to turn this around.
I don’t know if that means reaching out to the students more, or to the community more, or both.
The Silver Puck Club needs to be more of a Friends of the Raiders club than purely a fundraising arm, or there needs to be two separate organizations. Can you imagine monthly meetings (with coaches, athletes, media members, etc.), year’round?
 
Last edited:
I have also been thinking of the (emotional) roller-coaster idea a lot lately, thanks to Barb. So, I thought, ‘well, I will show a positive year-end note… post-season goals-for vs. goals-against.’

03/03, Dartmouth, 5-3,
03/10, Saint Lawrence, 4-3 OT,
03/11, Saint Lawrence, 3-2,
03/17, Quinnipiac, 2-1, 2OT,
03/18, Harvard, 3-2,

03/24, Michigan, 1-11.

The total? 18-22. Dang!

We beat the only team ranked below us by two goals, and then beat each team ranked above us by only one goal, until Michigan. That probably should have been fair warning, unless you are caught up in the moment (like I was).
 
Fishman'81 said:
AQ's just degrade the tournament field. Been happening for years and years now, yes... And this season was a perfect example of that.

[...] just to get hammered, when there are maybe 25 more deserving teams?

Makes absolutely no sense at all. The BS AQ thing helped to make this tournament a complete yawner in the early rounds.
Click to expand...

[Note, sarcasm alert:] Yeah, using your logic I was wondering about how #7 Harvard and #13 Michigan Tech were allowed in the tournament. They, too, got hammered. Why not just let the top two teams in the nation battle it out in a best of seven series. But then who gets to choose the top two?
Note, I am not dumping on any teams in the tournament. According to the well-established rules, all sixteen were deserving participants in my opinion.
 
Great attendance work...several of us have made the point over the past decade that SOME entity has to commit to improving our attendance numbers...one sees no evidence of our (relatively) new and excellent facility actually helping the numbers...that entity IMO should be the Silver Puck Council, but it desperately needs new blood and an elevated commitment...golf outings and SPC weekends are nice, but really miss the point...a recruited athlete attending one of our home games vis-a-vis Lynah? Forget it...and we all know Hamilton is not the size of Ithaca...but striving for, say, 1500/game does not seem like an unrealistic goal...
 
QuasiCosmos said:
[Note, sarcasm alert:] Yeah, using your logic I was wondering about how #7 Harvard and #13 Michigan Tech were allowed in the tournament. They, too, got hammered. Why not just let the top two teams in the nation battle it out in a best of seven series. But then who gets to choose the top two?
Note, I am not dumping on any teams in the tournament. According to the well-established rules, all sixteen were deserving participants in my opinion.
Click to expand...

Shouldn't have posted here, even though I'm actually within an easy drive to Hamilton, and have have attended many Colgate games for a lot of seasons, and have read this thread for a bunch of years. My sincere contrition. Just stayed up too long last night.

Still, I have despised the tournament AQ thing since I was in the womb. It's an absurd way to pick the field, IMO.
 
Fishman'81 said:
Still, I have despised the tournament AQ thing since I was in the womb. It's an absurd way to pick the field, IMO.
Click to expand...
You do realize that each league has the ability to choose their AQ, right? Many, myself included, feel that the regular season champ should get the AQ as a reward for the entire body of their seasons work. However, I think the leagues all feel that a wild card winner in the tournament is good for the sport. Colgate was the ECAC wild card this season and their win in Placid allowed 4 teams into the tourney.
 
Fishman, no problem as far as I am concerned. I have posted on other threads, then got up in the middle of the night and deleted them. Alcohol was usually what I blamed for my lack of tact (not lack of sleep). he he he

I also follow short-track auto racing, where we have ‘provisionals.’ I don’t mind auto-bids nor provisionals, as fans of all sanctions and all conferences deserve representation in the ‘feature event.’

I leave Monday for Amtrak’s AutoTrain to Florida for the Frozen Four, which will be my 26th since 1993. I will be cheering for Minnesota and Quinnipiac (not so much as the ECAC rep as much as it is the opponent of my much-disliked Michigan… since ‘96 in Cincinnati), but I fully expect the NCAA title game to be a rematch of the Big Ten tournament title game.
 
Last edited:
Interesting attendance data. I thought this year we had good attendance from what I saw at the rink and on ESPN+. I was surprised to see it that low. I live in the Cuse and I normally try and check out a rare OOC team that come to town in the Fall, the Cornell game and another ECAC game. I used to have the Friday or Sat night season package but having ESPN+ and being able to watch the game at home has made it more convenient, wonder if others are also in this boat.

Fishman, interesting post to get the thread going! First, Colgate had to win 2 at SLU, then beat two top 7 teams to make it which is no easy task. We did best Qpac twice during the season who is now in the Frozen. That being said the result vs. Michigan was brutal and didn’t look good for the AQ but you can’t judge a team by one really bad night. Boston U lost to Michigan 9-2 earlier this season, I know that’s not 11-1 but bad games can happen. That game was 4-0 after the first and 7-1 after the second period. BU absolutely deserves to be in the Frozen Four and is a good team despite that one game. Michigan is literally loaded with NHL talent and the game got away after just down 1-0 after the first. I hope you continue to support Colgate and go to games if you live nearby, no reason not to if you like college hockey.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top