unofan
Well-known member
For as long as they are willing to take the guff, I'm glad Sic and Hovey continue to post their contrarian views (here, at least). The choirbox is full, and it's vocal. I may disagree with most of what they say, but as Justice Holmes once put it:
[W]hen men have realized that time has upset many fighting faiths, they may come to believe even more than they believe the very foundations of their own conduct that the ultimate good desired is better reached by free trade in ideas—that the best test of truth is the power of the thought to get itself accepted in the competition of the market . . . .
The competition part.
Hovey, yes, since he's genuine in his opinions. Sic is part Dunning-Kruger, part troll, part propaganda-influenced, and with each part taking its turn as the dominant trait depending on the day. The trick is to correct the Dunning- Kruger errors, ignore the troll attempts, and pity the propaganda spiels, but they overlap so much it can be tough to tell which one is in play.