Re: Campaign 2016 - Primary season! Duck (questions) season!
You post this list like having the press hate you is a bad thing. It apparently never strikes anyone that a politician's popularity with the voters is inverse to his or her relationship with the press. If I were a politician, I'd want the press to be in the bag for my opponent.
A favorable press is still the best. Look at what Dubya was able to accomplish with a lapdog press after 9/11.
But I agree that a negative press is better than no press. Hillary and Bernie face different problems with the press, but Bernie's is worse. Hillary faces a press obsessed with all the faux scandals the opposition has been trying to tag her with for 20 years, partly because they thrive on conflict but partly because of Hillary's own horrendous reactions. Other than at the actual Benghazi!!!1!1 hearing, at which she was superb, her bristeling and lawyering make great hate watching reality TV. Hillary's better than the "conniving girl" the Bachelor always casts for getting eyes on the screen to hiss.
But Bernie's problem is the press either ignores him or treats him as a joke. This comes from the very deliberate moving of the Overton window away from the real left (which just happens to correspond to the corporate media's immediate financial stakes and its 1% owners' ideology). Public and leftist media is of course completely in the bag for Bernie, but those reach about 85 people in Berkeley who are all already on his campaign team. The Gen Pop never hears anything about Bernie except when one of the candidates make a snide aside.
(Bernie's other problem is, of course, that's he's Bernie. If he had Trump's swagger or Obama's eloquence he'd be in a lot better shape, and in fact liberals need to study this campaign for the next few years and actively recruit and groom candidates who are great both on the issues and optically, just as the far right did through the 90's).
The prissy condescension at liberals by a few posters here is just a reflection of the national media Conventional Wisdom, because those folks learned the lesson that if you speak seriously and non-jokingly about the systemic unfairness of the American economic system you get marginalized and then you don't get the nice promotion to the corner office. That's why real change always comes outside the establishment. There is a reason why Trump and Sanders are, as somebody put so well, "sipping from the same soda with different straws." They are both appealing to those who recognize the system
isn't actually broken -- it's working exactly as designed.