What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Campaign 2016 Part XXI: Do you love farce? My fault, I fear.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XXI: Do you love farce? My fault, I fear.

Jonah Goldberg is an as-shole, but this is funny. On the idea that Trump turned his campaign around with the debate:

It’s like the plane's going down in flames -- but at least they got the coffee maker working again.
 
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XXI: Do you love farce? My fault, I fear.

Jonah Goldberg is an as-shole, but this is funny. On the idea that Trump turned his campaign around with the debate:

It’s like the plane's going down in flames -- but at least they got the coffee maker working again.

It's a great plane, a really great plane. And it's got a great coffee maker, a really great coffee maker, and we will make the coffee maker work again. We'll bring back all the coffee makers from Jhina and Mexico.
 
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XXI: Do you love farce? My fault, I fear.


C'mon, seriously?

The episode, titled “Beauty and Brains,” aired in 2010. Contestants were tasked with making over a country music star before presenting them to three music industry insiders.

A makeover, like how they appear? What the < bleep > else is Trump supposed to comment on when he's judging how well two teams do makeovers. What was he supposed to say?

"I'd like to comment and give you feedback about how you did but it may venture into the realm of commenting on a lady's appearance so I'll refrain from all comment and leave you hanging as to why I chose the other team."

He's a schmuck, but c'mon, this is a stretch.
 
C'mon, seriously?



A makeover, like how they appear? What the < bleep > else is Trump supposed to comment on when he's judging how well two teams do makeovers. What was he supposed to say?

"I'd like to comment and give you feedback about how you did but it may venture into the realm of commenting on a lady's appearance so I'll refrain from all comment and leave you hanging as to why I chose the other team."

He's a schmuck, but c'mon, this is a stretch.
Agreed that it isn't the smoking gun we all hoped for, but it continues the theme of "petty annoying sh*t Trump can't take his mind off." The task was to slap some makeup on each artist, take some glamour shots, put together production pieces and present their candidate to the music executives. Trump should have been judging each group on how fast, well done, and successful each group was in their presentations.

But instead, he nitpicked the shade and amount of makeup one team used on their star.
 
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XXI: Do you love farce? My fault, I fear.

But instead, he nitpicked ...

That's kinda the point of "reality TV" --> nitpick non-sense to create "controversy", "conflict", and "drama". From that ... reality ;) ... perspective, he nailed it.
 
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XXI: Do you love farce? My fault, I fear.

That's kinda the point of "reality TV" --> nitpick non-sense to create "controversy", "conflict", and "drama". From that ... reality ;) ... perspective, he nailed it.

While I agree it's tame compared to other thing's he's said, this had nothing to do with reality tv.

“I assume you’re gonna leave this off, don’t put this **** on the show, you know. But her skin, her skin sucks, okay?” he says, according to the transcript. “I mean her skin, she needs some serious ****in’ dermatology.”

This clearly wasn't something for the show, or judging the team's work. He is simply an a55hole.
 
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XXI: Do you love farce? My fault, I fear.

At this point, 538 has HRC soaring at levels that previously required Trump to try to pick a fight with a Gold Star family.
 
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XXI: Do you love farce? My fault, I fear.

Fun piece comparing the bunker days of Nixon and the apricot abuser.

I never thought the GOP would ever pay for their 38-year racist and sexist pogrom. I am delighted to be wrong.

You own this, you disgusting national front party. Every true conservative should be singing, "I hope that you burn."
 
Last edited:
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XXI: Do you love farce? My fault, I fear.

#muslimsreportstuff is awesome! Some gems:

"Suspicious gentlemen in large vehicle and a brown uniform leaving packages around my neighborhood. #muslimsreport"

"Hi, I'm Muslim & want 2 report a man in St. Louis butchering English by stringing adjectives & passing them as sentences #MuslimsReportStuff"

"He's behind you!
#MuslimsReportStuff
#Debate" (with picture of Donald behind Hillary)

"I'm not entirely sure I've seen all the Star Wars movies and I'm not entirely sure I care #MuslimsReportStuff"

"Grammatically challenged orange man with control issues interrupts lady 18 times on national stage, humping chair #MuslimsReportStuff"

"I think my cat miauwed into the direction of Mecca. Will observe for more suspicious behaviour. #MuslimsReportStuff"

"I'm a muslim reporting that all-spice doesn't really include *all* the spices. #MuslimsReportStuff"
 
Last edited:
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XXI: Do you love farce? My fault, I fear.

You want to see the GOP version of Scooby...watch Steve Schmidt on Meet the Press. I am biased cause I like the guy but **** he not only guarantees a Hillary victory, he says the Senate will flip as well and the only question is how far the House falls. Then he rails the party even worse than he did over Palin! :eek:
 
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XXI: Do you love farce? My fault, I fear.


Yet she believes the difference here vs. Jordan is our vetting process would be much more comprehensive. And just because the plan would be to increase the flow it doesn't automatically mean it will happen unless that process is made more robust. Regarding the PAC link I'm not sure how "substantial portion" = small increments. I stopped reading after that stretch of interpretation.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top