USCHO Fan Forum
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.
Campaign 2016 Part XVII: If debates are great theater, I think this one closes early
- Thread starter joecct
- Start date
- Status
Not the Suicide Squad?
Kepler
Si certus es dubita
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XVII: If debates are great theater, I think this one closes e
That's what they should be calling anybody who works for Trump.
That's what they should be calling anybody who works for Trump.
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XVII: If debates are great theater, I think this one closes e
Well, we know from the last 6 months that Trump is often ill prepared and ignorant of topics he should know, given his aspirations. It appears he is just plain lazy.
Well, we know from the last 6 months that Trump is often ill prepared and ignorant of topics he should know, given his aspirations. It appears he is just plain lazy.
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XVII: If debates are great theater, I think this one closes e
Laughed my arse off to this:
https://thechive.files.wordpress.co...37-photos-216.jpg?quality=85&strip=info&w=600
Laughed my arse off to this:
https://thechive.files.wordpress.co...37-photos-216.jpg?quality=85&strip=info&w=600
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XVII: If debates are great theater, I think this one closes e
In my next life, I want to live with, work with, or somehow be close enough to Rachel Maddow to have regular exposure to her wit and intelligence.
I realize I have some work to do in this life to qualify.
In my next life, I want to live with, work with, or somehow be close enough to Rachel Maddow to have regular exposure to her wit and intelligence.
I realize I have some work to do in this life to qualify.
FlagDUDE08
Banned
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XVII: If debates are great theater, I think this one closes e
As much as the Huff have 1st AND 9th amendment rights, their bias has been truly exposed. http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...erminates-writer-questioning-hillarys-health/
As much as the Huff have 1st AND 9th amendment rights, their bias has been truly exposed. http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...erminates-writer-questioning-hillarys-health/
Kepler
Si certus es dubita
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XVII: If debates are great theater, I think this one closes e
In my next life, I just want to be her girlfriend.
In my next life, I just want to be her girlfriend.
Kepler
Si certus es dubita
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XVII: If debates are great theater, I think this one closes e
Saudi. Burmese. All those non-whites look alike.
Saudi. Burmese. All those non-whites look alike.
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XVII: If debates are great theater, I think this one closes e
As do I, but I felt that would be overreaching.
As do I, but I felt that would be overreaching.
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XVII: If debates are great theater, I think this one closes e
Charlie Pierce nails it.
http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/news/a48173/new-york-times-clinton-coverage/
Clinton campaign is giving zero ground to so called liberal press. Gotta love it.
Charlie Pierce nails it.
http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/news/a48173/new-york-times-clinton-coverage/
Clinton campaign is giving zero ground to so called liberal press. Gotta love it.
Kepler
Si certus es dubita
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XVII: If debates are great theater, I think this one closes e
Less than 24 hours to vote in the August poll.
Less than 24 hours to vote in the August poll.
busterman62
I got a pocket full of kryptonite
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XVII: If debates are great theater, I think this one closes e
One of the talking heads this AM was spouting off about the "against vote" saying that many who will vote Trump don't support him but are actually voting against HRC (and vice versa). I'd be interested to see if that holds true here @ USCHO. Based on some of the comments here, I think it may be more than just a few. Maybe next poll you could add "Voting against Trump by voting HRC" & "Voting for HRC" etc. as options.
One of the talking heads this AM was spouting off about the "against vote" saying that many who will vote Trump don't support him but are actually voting against HRC (and vice versa). I'd be interested to see if that holds true here @ USCHO. Based on some of the comments here, I think it may be more than just a few. Maybe next poll you could add "Voting against Trump by voting HRC" & "Voting for HRC" etc. as options.
WeAreNDHockey
\../ \../
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XVII: If debates are great theater, I think this one closes e
I rarely feel as if I'm voting for someone. I'm usually voting for the one I dislike less. Certainly the case this time around.
I rarely feel as if I'm voting for someone. I'm usually voting for the one I dislike less. Certainly the case this time around.
bronconick
Yep, still here
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XVII: If debates are great theater, I think this one closes e
I think 2008 has been the only time I've fully voted "for" someone.
I think 2008 has been the only time I've fully voted "for" someone.
1980
1984
1976 was the only time I have not voted R. If the Ds had run a better candidate in 2004....
Kepler
Si certus es dubita
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XVII: If debates are great theater, I think this one closes e
I've backed D, L*, or I** in every presidential election. Whether I voted "For" or "Against" aligns exactly with the winner of each of the elections I've voted in. It looks like I am "As Goes Maine":
For (4-0): 92, 96, 08, 12
Against (0-5): 80**, 84*, 88*, 00, 04
In 16 I will be voting For.
(I am including 80 although I missed the cut by a couple months, as I followed the campaigns closely and knew exactly who and what I would have backed.)
I've backed D, L*, or I** in every presidential election. Whether I voted "For" or "Against" aligns exactly with the winner of each of the elections I've voted in. It looks like I am "As Goes Maine":
For (4-0): 92, 96, 08, 12
Against (0-5): 80**, 84*, 88*, 00, 04
In 16 I will be voting For.
(I am including 80 although I missed the cut by a couple months, as I followed the campaigns closely and knew exactly who and what I would have backed.)
Kepler
Si certus es dubita
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XVII: If debates are great theater, I think this one closes e
No. That's not an excuse for voting for R in 2004. There is no excuse for voting for R that time. There were 46,000 write-ins.
No. That's not an excuse for voting for R in 2004. There is no excuse for voting for R that time. There were 46,000 write-ins.
Last edited:
- Status