The one way Trump can get himself elected is to strike a loud enough chord with voters who fear Islamic terrorism becoming a common occurrence in the United States. It will be struck of course with lies, bold but hollow statements of toughness and appeals to fear instead of reason. But this is America. There are quite literally tens of millions of voting age people out there who will fall for the most ridiculous examples of such crap. Hillary better be ready to dish out a dose of similar stuff of her own, or potential swing states like PA, Ohio, Virginia, North Carolina, Colorado or Nevada are going to fall for Trump's particular brand of speech.
Unless there is a terrorist attack here between now and election day. Then she's toast.
Oh definitely. I'm sure we've had atheists -- through most of history atheists had to hide because of persecution by the dullards, and of course in politics you always want to pretend you're the person Billy Joe Dumbf-ck would like to have a beer with. The majority of the Founders were such abstract-minded deists as to count as atheists for all real purposes. Generally speaking, the intelligentsia of every society (the real one, not the business or political world talking hairdos) have been atheists. Skepticism comes with the territory of critical, clear thinking and the innate ridicule of argumentum ad verecundiam.
My guess: Jefferson.
For an agnostic he sure had a lot of bibles in his library...including the Jefferson Bible named after him![]()
The one way Trump can get himself elected is to strike a loud enough chord with voters who fear Islamic terrorism becoming a common occurrence in the United States. It will be struck of course with lies, bold but hollow statements of toughness and appeals to fear instead of reason. But this is America. There are quite literally tens of millions of voting age people out there who will fall for the most ridiculous examples of such crap. Hillary better be ready to dish out a dose of similar stuff of her own, or potential swing states like PA, Ohio, Virginia, North Carolina, Colorado or Nevada are going to fall for Trump's particular brand of speech.
A Modest Proposal. (Not mine, obviously.) I was listening to Steele and Unger on my godd-mn endless commute last night and a caller suggested Clinton refuse to debate Trump unless Trump apologized for all the racist, sexist garbage he has said. Obviously Trump would never do that. The caller's opinion was Trump doesn't deserve to have a forum to normalize his hate speech -- treat him like a white supremacist or holocaust denier and shut off his oxygen.
I thought this was a ludicrous idea but much to my surprise both hosts and the news guy they had on all agreed that would be a net positive for both the country and for her.
I still am not convinced. What do people here think? Would refusing on principle to debate him (1) be politically good for her, and (2) help marginalize him and by extension be a good precedent for our politics?
I think it will play badly with the swing voters.
Bad idea. Loudmouth blowhard idiots need to be exposed to the widest audience possible. Trump would immediately go around saying she was afraid to debate him. Its far more effective to bring up the racist things he's said to his face and let him stammer through an explanation.
@realDonaldTrump: I am pleased to announce that I have chosen Governor Mike Pence as my Vice Presidential running mate. News conference tomorrow at 11:00 A.M.
That's from this morning, right? So have they pushed back the news conference for two (three?) days now? Or was it just the announcement they postponed from Wednesday/yesterday to today?