What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Campaign 2016 Part XI: the Two Party Problem

Status
Not open for further replies.
Kepler said:
The other one was seat belt laws, cuz "how dangerous I live is up to me." I always figured, sure, if you sign an opt out so we don't have to pay for your medical care, you be you, Mr. Liberty. :p.
Click to expand...

Wait. So if Mookie wears a belt you will pay for his medical care?!?!?

BINGO!!! Mookie's in :D
 
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XI: the Two Party Problem

joecct said:
TrusTED is now iTed. Looks like iCarly will be his VP candidate.

Torpedoes los!!
Click to expand...

So your plan to revitalize your campaign and stay alive despite Trump trouncing you is to pick a VP candidate that was so worthless she couldnt even outlast Ben Carson? Bold strategy...
 
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XI: the Two Party Problem

So, everyone happy that the "You're Fired" boss won this seasons Presidential Primary Apprentice?

Now all that needs to happen is for Hillary to impale herself like she's fully capable of doing and then we get President Trump and the country gets exactly what it deserves.
 
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XI: the Two Party Problem

See, here's where Calgary Ted screwed up. Instead of picking hound dog Carly Fiorina, he should have picked some smoking hot babe as his running mate. Then, not only would the media attention finally shift away from Trump for 5 minutes, but you just KNOW the Donald couldn't resist saying something extremely sexist within a nanosecond of seeing the woman's picture. Conservatives have no problem denigrating women. BUT, if you do that to good looking women they're a lot less forgiving. :eek: :D ;)
 
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XI: the Two Party Problem

Handyman said:
So your plan to revitalize your campaign and stay alive despite Trump trouncing you is to pick a VP candidate that was so worthless she couldnt even outlast Ben Carson? Bold strategy...
Click to expand...

It's a slap in the face to his think tank buddies, too. Cruz is, in all honesty, probably the most "test taker smart" person in the field on both sides. He can at least spell conservatism and either has a grip on the European intellectual roots of liberalism and republicanism or has the chops to be able to acquire that easily. He's a Rand Corporation / Heritage Foundation / CATO Institute / Hoover Institute sort of dude.

I know those people. Compared to them, Carly Fiorina is as dumb as Dubya, as incurious as Drumpf, and as shallow as Newt. Given that she failed in business, she's not even a first rate second rate mind.

Cruz' single possible redeeming characteristic was that being balls out intelligent he would show the door to the horde of semi-literate bozos who have advised GOP administrations, the Kristols and JPods and Kagans and VDHs and all the other frauds who so impress at DC cocktail parties because there's nobody actually smart interested in attending. He might have used his powers for good and then, at least, we would have seen a test of conservative principles under ideal experimental conditions.

But no, he picked a boob about on par with the other minnows in the GOP sea.
 
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XI: the Two Party Problem

Rover said:
hound dog Carly Fiorina... some smoking hot babe...Conservatives have no problem denigrating women
Click to expand...
Liberalism in a nutshell right here. tDonald should just be honest and run as a Democrat, he has the prototypical personality.
 
unofan said:
And shiat like that happened well before Obamacare; Obamacare just made for a convenient excuse.

My first job was as a busboy in the 90s. Id be scheduled 5-close on the weekends, but very rarely was kept on the clock past 9 or so. My shifts were even shorter on weeknights or for Sunday lunch despite being scheduled for 6 or 8 hours, and that was making all of $3.15/hr plus a cut of the tips.

Franchise owners are some of the cheapest farkers out there, and will blame everyone but themselves for their poor decisions. This should not be news to anyone.
Click to expand...
From my experience they may not have gotten benefits before but they could work more than 28 hrs, now they get 28 and no more
 
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XI: the Two Party Problem

geezer said:
Liberalism in a nutshell right here. tDonald should just be honest and run as a Democrat, he has the prototypical personality.
Click to expand...

BWA HA HA - Enjoy the Hillary vs Trump election geezer. Remember, you reap what you sow...
 
unofan said:
And from my experience, business owners who pull that crap would have done so anyway.
Click to expand...

If there was no mandate for Obama care why would they limit those workers when they need folks to work those hours.
 
walrus said:
If there was no mandate for Obama care why would they limit those workers when they need folks to work those hours.
Click to expand...

Why does someone who treats their employees like a commodity need Obamacare to treat them like a commodity?
 
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XI: the Two Party Problem

Hate to say it, but compared to Fiorina, Trump is a genius in the boardroom. This is an enormous mistake for Cruz. Even if the RNC can still manage to somehow pull off the Cleveland Screwjob and get him the nomination, he may have just Palined away his slim chances at the White House.
 
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XI: the Two Party Problem

Fiorina likes to jump on bandwagons the second before they crash. Case in point, Iowa football.
 
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XI: the Two Party Problem

Infosnores predicting martial law if it looks like Trump's winning. Not sure you really need the link on that one...
 
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XI: the Two Party Problem

FlagDUDE08 said:
Infosnores
Click to expand...

Wait, you don't like them? Are they false flag, agitprop, agent provocateur, Illuminati plants? Is Alex Jones a double (triple, quadruple) agent?

Who is your trusted source?
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top