walrus
Wind up workin' in a gas station
They did, beautiful people can't be expected to live like their serfs
USCHO Fan Forum
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.
Campaign 2016 Part, let's say, X: There's a red moon rising On the Cuyahoga River
- Thread starter Kepler
- Start date
- Status
They did, beautiful people can't be expected to live like their serfs
Kepler
Si certus es dubita
Re: Campaign 2016 Part, let's say, X: There's a red moon rising On the Cuyahoga River
That's actually worse than what I would have guessed. I assumed she'd be a lot more careful given the risk of somebody recording her. I assumed she'd fellate in private, not en masse.
That's actually worse than what I would have guessed. I assumed she'd be a lot more careful given the risk of somebody recording her. I assumed she'd fellate in private, not en masse.
nobody cell phoned the speeches? The cell phone got Mitt in a candid moment. Nobody has a gotcha HRC video?
Kepler
Si certus es dubita
Re: Campaign 2016 Part, let's say, X: There's a red moon rising On the Cuyahoga River
You would think so. It's not like people couldn't see this coming from a mile away.
You would think so. It's not like people couldn't see this coming from a mile away.
False. First, Obamacare doesn't require everyone to buy from an exchange. If your employer provided a plan, you don't have to go through an exchange. Congress had an employer provided plan, even if they didn't go through the exchange it wouldn't be an 'exemption'. It would be out of the ordinary for them to have to purchase their own insurance on an exchange.
The truth is they did away with federal health benefits for congress and their staff and required them to purchase from an exchange, so they are treated differently than other federal employees. They did the opposite of exempting themselves.
http://www.factcheck.org/2013/05/congress-and-an-exemption-from-obamacare/
http://theweek.com/articles/453495/last-time-congress-not-exempt-from-obamacare
Last edited:
FadeToBlack&Gold
Microlot Marxist
Re: Campaign 2016 Part, let's say, X: There's a red moon rising On the Cuyahoga River
She gave those speeches in 2007/2008. People tend to forget that the smartphone was in its infancy at the time, and how quickly it has advanced to being a fully-functional pocket PC.
She gave those speeches in 2007/2008. People tend to forget that the smartphone was in its infancy at the time, and how quickly it has advanced to being a fully-functional pocket PC.
FadeToBlack&Gold
Microlot Marxist
Re: Campaign 2016 Part, let's say, X: There's a red moon rising On the Cuyahoga River
According to Slick Willy, Bernie tells his supporters to shoot every third person on Wall Street.
Kep, I didn't know you owned a gun.
According to Slick Willy, Bernie tells his supporters to shoot every third person on Wall Street.
Kep, I didn't know you owned a gun.
According to Slick Willy, Bernie tells his supporters to shoot every third person on Wall Street.
Kep, I didn't know you owned a gun.
If tD did that, the homeless population would suffer a 33% decline in population.
mookie1995
there's a good buck in that racket.
Re: Campaign 2016 Part, let's say, X: There's a red moon rising On the Cuyahoga River
why stop at 1 of every 3?
why stop at 1 of every 3?
Kepler
Si certus es dubita
Re: Campaign 2016 Part, let's say, X: There's a red moon rising On the Cuyahoga River
It's funny to watch the other two try to sell each other out to stay alive.
It's funny to watch the other two try to sell each other out to stay alive.
Kepler
Si certus es dubita
Re: Campaign 2016 Part, let's say, X: There's a red moon rising On the Cuyahoga River
Caribou Barbie makes a threat.
Caribou Barbie makes a threat.
Re: Campaign 2016 Part, let's say, X: There's a red moon rising On the Cuyahoga River
I wonder why they cut off that quote where they did, rather than give the whole thing. Must not have been enough space for it.
According to Slick Willy, Bernie tells his supporters to shoot every third person on Wall Street.
Kep, I didn't know you owned a gun.
I wonder why they cut off that quote where they did, rather than give the whole thing. Must not have been enough space for it.
FadeToBlack&Gold
Microlot Marxist
Re: Campaign 2016 Part, let's say, X: There's a red moon rising On the Cuyahoga River
It's irrelevant. There may be fewer people working on Wall Street, but what does that have to do with the actual issue of the banks having too much influence in Washington?
And so what if "Ahhh, it's a joke, get it? Ahahahahahaha!" He wasn't laughing when he said it (the Bill of the 90s would have been much smoother). The Clintons are now using Republican tactics - ginning up the dismissal of an entire generation as radicals. In reality after growing up with them in power for two and a half decades, we are simply sick of their brand of multi-million dollar crony politics and doublespeak.
And that's not an endorsement of Bernie. As I pointed out earlier this weekend, the man is no saint.
Our choices at this point are:
1) A billionaire with a big mouth and a penchant for fascist rhetoric
2) A Bible-thumper
3) A former Secretary of State/Senator/FLOTUS with any-way-the-wind-blows morals
4) A hypocrite with no track record of viable/successful legislation in his career
My head hurts.
It's irrelevant. There may be fewer people working on Wall Street, but what does that have to do with the actual issue of the banks having too much influence in Washington?
And so what if "Ahhh, it's a joke, get it? Ahahahahahaha!" He wasn't laughing when he said it (the Bill of the 90s would have been much smoother). The Clintons are now using Republican tactics - ginning up the dismissal of an entire generation as radicals. In reality after growing up with them in power for two and a half decades, we are simply sick of their brand of multi-million dollar crony politics and doublespeak.
And that's not an endorsement of Bernie. As I pointed out earlier this weekend, the man is no saint.
Our choices at this point are:
1) A billionaire with a big mouth and a penchant for fascist rhetoric
2) A Bible-thumper
3) A former Secretary of State/Senator/FLOTUS with any-way-the-wind-blows morals
4) A hypocrite with no track record of viable/successful legislation in his career
My head hurts.
mookie1995
there's a good buck in that racket.
Re: Campaign 2016 Part, let's say, X: There's a red moon rising On the Cuyahoga River
mookie is right there with ya'
mookie is right there with ya'
Re: Campaign 2016 Part, let's say, X: There's a red moon rising On the Cuyahoga River
I wouldn't confuse Bernie Sanders with speaking for an entire generation. I don't know if that was Clinton's point, but it doesn't matter. Lizzy Warren is a far, far FAR more effective voice for progressive values than the probably senile Sanders. She does this by proposing concise but plausible solutions to problems, such as allowing students to pay same interest rates as banks borrowing money from Feds for example. She also is big on using existing laws and regulations to hold people's feet to the fire, not blowing up the entire system and starting anew. Look at it this way, Warren as a private citizen did more to get a piece of a law enacted (the CFPB as part of Dodd-Frank) than Sanders has in 25 years in Congress!
I wouldn't confuse Bernie Sanders with speaking for an entire generation. I don't know if that was Clinton's point, but it doesn't matter. Lizzy Warren is a far, far FAR more effective voice for progressive values than the probably senile Sanders. She does this by proposing concise but plausible solutions to problems, such as allowing students to pay same interest rates as banks borrowing money from Feds for example. She also is big on using existing laws and regulations to hold people's feet to the fire, not blowing up the entire system and starting anew. Look at it this way, Warren as a private citizen did more to get a piece of a law enacted (the CFPB as part of Dodd-Frank) than Sanders has in 25 years in Congress!
Kepler
Si certus es dubita
Re: Campaign 2016 Part, let's say, X: There's a red moon rising On the Cuyahoga River
One counterpoint to that claim that you make in every post.
Look at it this way, Warren as a private citizen did more to get a piece of a law enacted (the CFPB as part of Dodd-Frank) than Sanders has in 25 years in Congress!
One counterpoint to that claim that you make in every post.
Re: Campaign 2016 Part, let's say, X: There's a red moon rising On the Cuyahoga River
My 28 year old son, who is as conservative as moi, thinks Bernie is the only viable candidate.
I still think Bernie can hit HRC with enough stings to affect the fatal error which will topple her candidacy.
Kep - do you think Liz will drop a political nuke on HRC?
My 28 year old son, who is as conservative as moi, thinks Bernie is the only viable candidate.
I still think Bernie can hit HRC with enough stings to affect the fatal error which will topple her candidacy.
Kep - do you think Liz will drop a political nuke on HRC?
mookie1995
there's a good buck in that racket.
Re: Campaign 2016 Part, let's say, X: There's a red moon rising On the Cuyahoga River
Bern needs to put up an ad with people who were at these speeches and tell stories of what she said.
Bern needs to put up an ad with people who were at these speeches and tell stories of what she said.
Handyman
Hug someone you care about...
Re: Campaign 2016 Part, let's say, X: There's a red moon rising On the Cuyahoga River
Again why do you engage the troll? Do you have some innate desire to read him calling all progressives potheads while implying all Sanders Supporters have a homoerotic affection for him?
Again why do you engage the troll? Do you have some innate desire to read him calling all progressives potheads while implying all Sanders Supporters have a homoerotic affection for him?
- Status