What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Campaign 2016 - in bridge, the trump cards are really wild.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Campaign 2016 - in bridge, the trump cards are really wild.

As a Michigander, I was hoping for a euchre reference, but this is OK. :p
 
Re: Campaign 2016 - in bridge, the trump cards are really wild.

Just a few weeks after Christie sold his donor list to Rubio, New Jersey's Gov. Lardass Bully throws his support to Trump. Did it take the promise of the AG job to get Christie to back the guy he called "a carnival barker" and "entertainer in chief" and the guy who insisted that Christie knew about the GWB lane closings? What's next, an endorsement from Paul LePage, the future Secretary of (Child) Labor?
 
Just a few weeks after Christie sold his donor list to Rubio, New Jersey's Gov. Lardass Bully throws his support to Trump. Did it take the promise of the AG job to get Christie to back the guy he called "a carnival barker" and "entertainer in chief" and the guy who insisted that Christie knew about the GWB lane closings? What's next, an endorsement from Paul LePage, the future Secretary of (Child) Labor?

Politics makes strange bedfellows.
 
Re: Campaign 2016 - in bridge, the trump cards are really wild.

Just a few weeks after Christie sold his donor list to Rubio, New Jersey's Gov. Lardass Bully throws his support to Trump. Did it take the promise of the AG job to get Christie to back the guy he called "a carnival barker" and "entertainer in chief" and the guy who insisted that Christie knew about the GWB lane closings? What's next, an endorsement from Paul LePage, the future Secretary of (Child) Labor?

Lets give Trump credit. The man's political instincts are off the charts. If he wasn't insane he'd be really, really dangerous. Fresh off a debate where the lamestream media was dying to declare Rubio the overwhelming victor and the new frontrunner, Trump had Christie cut Rubio off at the knees. I'm sure he had this endorsement in his back pocket waiting for maximum effect, and here it is.

While this endorsement isn't like if Lizzy Warren endorsed Bernie, its a close second. Christie was the chairman of the GOP Governors election committee. You don't get more Establishment than that. So much for Rubio consolidating everyone behind him. Yeah, LePage's endorsement is kinda amusing, but now Rick Scott has cover to back Trump. So does Scott Walker and a bunch of other Tea Party govs.

Don't know what Rubio did to Christie but this is a kick in the balls. Even if Christie had endorsed Kasich you could chalk it up to both being governors and all that. But Trump? Wow.
 
Lets give Trump credit. The man's political instincts are off the charts. If he wasn't insane he'd be really, really dangerous. Fresh off a debate where the lamestream media was dying to declare Rubio the overwhelming victor and the new frontrunner, Trump had Christie cut Rubio off at the knees. I'm sure he had this endorsement in his back pocket waiting for maximum effect, and here it is.

While this endorsement isn't like if Lizzy Warren endorsed Bernie, its a close second. Christie was the chairman of the GOP Governors election committee. You don't get more Establishment than that. So much for Rubio consolidating everyone behind him. Yeah, LePage's endorsement is kinda amusing, but now Rick Scott has cover to back Trump. So does Scott Walker and a bunch of other Tea Party govs.

Don't know what Rubio did to Christie but this is a kick in the balls. Even if Christie had endorsed Kasich you could chalk it up to both being governors and all that. But Trump? Wow.

Liz is playing it smart. She's a realist and while she can't stand Hillary she figures Bernie has about as much chance of being nominated as being elected Pope.

I wonder what the price will be for her endorsement? Will Hillary pay it and will she honor it?
 
Re: Campaign 2016 - in bridge, the trump cards are really wild.

Liz is playing it smart. She's a realist and while she can't stand Hillary she figures Bernie has about as much chance of being nominated as being elected Pope.

I wonder what the price will be for her endorsement? Will Hillary pay it and will she honor it?

Tough to say but you're right about Warren. This is going to really disappoint the Scooby's and Kepler's of the world, but a Lizzy Warren full throated endorsement of Hillary is going to bring a lot of Sanders voters on board. Not all of them mind you, but enough of them as she has a gift for framing arguments and I'm sure she'll do a stellar job on this one. Maybe Hillary needs to get behind a financial transaction tax?
 
Tough to say but you're right about Warren. This is going to really disappoint the Scooby's and Kepler's of the world, but a Lizzy Warren full throated endorsement of Hillary is going to bring a lot of Sanders voters on board. Not all of them mind you, but enough of them as she has a gift for framing arguments and I'm sure she'll do a stellar job on this one. Maybe Hillary needs to get behind a financial transaction tax?

I'd be careful about full throated endorsements around the Clintons.
 
Re: Campaign 2016 - in bridge, the trump cards are really wild.

mookie can't wait to vote for bern on tuesday!
 
Re: Campaign 2016 - in bridge, the trump cards are really wild.

Inside the Republican Party’s Desperate Mission to Stop Donald Trump

While still hopeful that Mr. Rubio might prevail, Mr. McConnell has begun preparing senators for the prospect of a Trump nomination, assuring them that, if it threatened to harm them in the general election, they could run negative ads about Mr. Trump to create space between him and Republican senators seeking re-election.

..crazy
 
Re: Campaign 2016 - in bridge, the trump cards are really wild.


People keep saying how amazing it is that Trump is leading this field. He's not running against a single person qualified for the office; he's just the loudest in a room full of screaming chimps. All it would take is for the Republicans to have one alternative to Trump that wasn't bat**** crazy. Hell, I'd caucus Republican on Tuesday if there was even a half-decent alternative to Trump. I wasn't quite of age to vote at the time, but I did help campaign for McCain in the 2000 Michigan primary, just because I knew what the alternative was.
 
Re: Campaign 2016 - in bridge, the trump cards are really wild.

People keep saying how amazing it is that Trump is leading this field. He's not running against a single person qualified for the office; he's just the loudest in a room full of screaming chimps. All it would take is for the Republicans to have one alternative to Trump that wasn't bat**** crazy. Hell, I'd caucus Republican on Tuesday if there was even a half-decent alternative to Trump. I wasn't quite of age to vote at the time, but I did help campaign for McCain in the 2000 Michigan primary, just because I knew what the alternative was.

It's funny. In 2008 it seemed like we were getting a sub-par McCain given the more conservative stances he had to take to get the nomination, and the whole VP pick. But in 2012, Romney seemed like such a step down and it made McCain in 2008 seem like sunnier days. Now Romney seems sooo much more reasonable compared to any of the GOP candidates this cycle. Which makes me afraid that in 20 years we'll be looking back to this year's crop as the halcyon days of the past.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top