What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Campaign 2014: The Epic Struggle To Win The Senate And Change Nothing

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Campaign 2014: The Epic Struggle To Win The Senate And Change Nothing

It wasn't the "Green Party" that was a Cuomo prop to force WFP off the ballot, it was the "Women's Equality Party" that he started in part to rid himself of WFP. Right concept wrong label.

Ah, thanks. I must have misheard.
 
Re: Campaign 2014: The Epic Struggle To Win The Senate And Change Nothing

David Leege, political scientist emeritus at Notre Dame, summarized his assessment of the election in a late night email:

“Bi-election year 2014 was the final chapter in making the president small. The immediate aftermath of 2008 was that Americans had finally conquered their racial aversions. The election of Barack Obama was a victory both for renewed national hope and long-awaited democracy. Obama was big, a star, a voice to be reckoned with, a mind to be taken seriously.

“By 2014 Obama was small, a punching bag, easily bullied, the one to whom small politicians could talk tough, abusively, the one whose ideas were ignored, the one whom his fellow partisans would come to avoid at all cost. How could this happen in six short years?”

And there it is. The big question. Here's my answer. McConnell comes to power (the most elitist, rich white man in the Senate) and destroys Obama at the same time. God Bless America.
 
Re: Campaign 2014: The Epic Struggle To Win The Senate And Change Nothing

The Dems have been doing that for long before Obama became president. For whatever reason, they just seem scared witless to stand up and say, this is what we believe in, and this is what we're gonna do for you to make your lives better. Clinton might be the only one that's actually done that since Carter.

I thought Obama would have the guts to do it. Instead he curled up in the fetal position. Probably the most powerless Executive in my lifetime.
 
Re: Campaign 2014: The Epic Struggle To Win The Senate And Change Nothing

What liberal positions strike you as totalitarian?

I took it to mean he thinks Obama is a totalitarian, not liberalism in general. That said it was kinda vague and I apologize if my interpretation is way off.
 
Re: Campaign 2014: The Epic Struggle To Win The Senate And Change Nothing

The Dems have been doing that for long before Obama became president. For whatever reason, they just seem scared witless to stand up and say, this is what we believe in, and this is what we're gonna do for you to make your lives better. Clinton might be the only one that's actually done that since Carter.

It's worse than that. The liberal record is of achievements that did make people's lives better, and that were fought tooth and nail by the right. Liberals made women's suffrage, child labor laws, unions, food and drug regulation, the minimum wage, the expansion of the middle class, social security, Head Start, and Medicare happen, always fighting the usual constellation of "it's immoral" / "it's communism" emotional scare tactics. When conservatives abandoned the great start they had made on environmental protection, we carried on. We even made financial regulation happen for a while, ensuring a 70-year period without a huge economic disaster, until the money finally corrupted even us and led us into another depression.

Liberalism works, but liberals just won't take the gloves off. We are forever turning the other cheek, which is great theology but lousy politics.
 
Re: Campaign 2014: The Epic Struggle To Win The Senate And Change Nothing

I thought Obama would have the guts to do it. Instead he curled up in the fetal position. Probably the most powerless Executive in my lifetime.
I don't know the answer to this question, but it's probably being debated this morning somewhere. To what extent did Obama go into hiding during this campaign (or, curl up in the fetal position as you put it) of his own volition, as opposed to stepping back into the shadows at the request of or as part of a larger strategy of making this campaign not about him or his policies?

Candidly, I have never heard or read anything that suggests that Obama refused or was afraid to go out on the campaign trail on behalf of Democrats and defend his administration and achievements. From afar it always appeared to me this was part of the strategy of the Democratic candidates. They knew Republicans wanted to make it about Obama, so the Democrats mistakenly thought that if they just hid him in the White House, the campaigns couldn't be about him. As a result, it came off as the Democrats being ashamed of him and his policies.
 
Re: Campaign 2014: The Epic Struggle To Win The Senate And Change Nothing

Do you figure that by repeating that silly trope for the umpteenth time, it will eventually become true? :D

Well, if Mitch has you fooled that he's actually a conservative then there's not really anything I can do about it. Or Ted Cruz, or Paul Ryan, or GW Bush. The list goes on and on. Even Mark Dayton here in Minnesota has some conservative streaks that Bush didn't have.
 
Re: Campaign 2014: The Epic Struggle To Win The Senate And Change Nothing

The main problem with running Obama out there was where the races were. His net popularity was something like -30 in the key flip states. I'm sure Dubya wasn't campaigning for statewide candidates in NY and CA in 2006, either.

I look at Grimes as the classic example of how we campaigned poorly. She had a winning issue with Kynect, but she ran from it. When people said "well, that's Obamacare and I hate Obama" she should have turned it around. "I don't care what you call it, here's why it's a good thing that you are already benefiting from." In my experience, lowfo voters have at most two (poor) soundbite reasons for not even thinking about an issue (this is not an accident -- most campaigning is pushing thought-terminating cliches into people's heads to give them an excuse to be lazy). As soon as you break those down, you have conversations. Also, people like to know stuff -- the like to be That Guy as anybody who has ever argued sports can attest -- so even if you don't sway them, the next time they hear somebody lay down the soundbite falsehood they may even do your work for you.

When my coworkers say "I hate taxes" I respond with "I hate debt more," and then start explaining how at the end of the day the question is about tax fairness and tax distribution, and that when the GOP says "lower taxes" what they mean is "lower taxes on the rich, less services for you, more debt for you kids." That gets conversations started even among people you might think were completely inoculated from questioning the pseudo-religion of the right.

Locally, some Dems do this. Nationally, the only Dem who has done it (and he did it well) was Bill.
 
Last edited:
Re: Campaign 2014: The Epic Struggle To Win The Senate And Change Nothing

So what happens if you hate taxes and debt? I don't think Hogan rolls back as much as he promised. I just want to stop the increases in taxes, spending and debt. A divided government should do much to accomplish that.
 
Re: Campaign 2014: The Epic Struggle To Win The Senate And Change Nothing

So what happens if you hate taxes and debt?

Unfortunately, if you want to avoid one you hafta have the other. Taxes are shots and debt is the flu.
 
Re: Campaign 2014: The Epic Struggle To Win The Senate And Change Nothing

What liberal positions strike you as totalitarian?

None of the "positions" do. it is only in implementation that I have major concerns.


How could anyone with a heart disagree with liberal "positions"? That has never been the issue, it's always been "how to go about it" where all the differences occur.




"feed hungry people"? I'm all for it. Force people to do so by confiscating their money and creating a "right to be fed" that never existed anywhere before? not so much. People "should" help those in need because it is the right thing to do; people in need do not have a right to be helped through government coercion.
 
Re: Campaign 2014: The Epic Struggle To Win The Senate And Change Nothing

the idea that I know best and the rest of you are wrong leads us down the totalitarianism path.

Thomas Sowell had a brilliant riposte to this concept. I paraphrase:

Maybe you are smarter than anyone else. That does not make you smarter than everyone else combined. That is why markets, and the electorate, always have more wisdom than any one individual ever can hope to have.
 
Re: Campaign 2014: The Epic Struggle To Win The Senate And Change Nothing

So the nasty, one trick (you should pardon the expression) pony has lost in Texas. And after such a brilliant campaign. Hammering a guy in a wheelchair about his position on the handicapped. And criticizing his position on inter-racial marriage. Did the classless b*tch not notice Abbot's Latina wife? The last time I looked she hadn't broken the 40% barrier and hadn't even carried females. How's that "War on Women" working out as a campaign theme? Well, maybe Senator Uterus will save the day in CO. No? What a shame.

Texas did inflict Dan Patrick (Lieutenant Governor) on an unsuspecting America. He's the very model of a Tea Party nutter and should probably help Democrat fund raising. As the hippy dippy sports guy on the CBS affiliate, Patrick once appeared shirtless on the air and painted himself Columbia Blue in honor of the Oilers. The word clown doesn't quite get there in describing him.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top