What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Business, Economics & Tax Policy 5.0: Can a blind nut find a squirrel?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Business, Economics & Tax Policy 5.0: Can a blind nut find a squirrel?

All this *****ing about the brainwash tube makes me want to take a road trip somewhere... I've yet to see the Yooper Loop... :p:D
 
Re: Business, Economics & Tax Policy 5.0: Can a blind nut find a squirrel?

FlagDUDE08 said:
All this *****ing about the brainwash tube makes me want to take a road trip somewhere... I've yet to see the Yooper Loop... :p:D
Click to expand...

ummmmmm, the name Alex Jones ring a bell?
 
Re: Business, Economics & Tax Policy 5.0: Can a blind nut find a squirrel?

unofan said:
They did. They gave the FCC the power to regulate communications.

The FCC exercised that power, and is now stupidly rescinding it because republicans are stupid.
Click to expand...

Not stupid. Just corrupt.
 
Re: Business, Economics & Tax Policy 5.0: Can a blind nut find a squirrel?

ScoobyDoo said:
Oh, please. Stop lying. You sound like Trump now.
Click to expand...

Don't accuse people of lying when they aren't lying. Say "stop exaggerating" if you must.

With the Clintons, policies like net neutrality were up for auction. I don't know why people continue to defend them on matters like that. They were corrupt as f-ck.

Obama would probably have played a little fast and loose to please his Silicone Valley donors. Hillary would have been Diane Feinsteining it right to the bank. That's how they rolled.

They did a lot of good, mostly passively as a firewall against the orcs but in some cases actively. But they were a crime family that behaved as if they were above the law. For f-cks sake, it's obvious.
 
Re: Business, Economics & Tax Policy 5.0: Can a blind nut find a squirrel?

Maybe you should lay off the lsd for a week or two. :)
 
Kepler said:
Don't accuse people of lying when they aren't lying. Say "stop exaggerating" if you must.

With the Clintons, policies like net neutrality were up for auction. I don't know why people continue to defend them on matters like that. They were corrupt as f-ck.

Obama would probably have played a little fast and loose to please his Silicone Valley donors. Hillary would have been Diane Feinsteining it right to the bank. That's how they rolled.

They did a lot of good, mostly passively as a firewall against the orcs but in some cases actively. But they were a crime family that behaved as if they were above the law. For f-cks sake, it's obvious.
Click to expand...

Oh for fark's sake. Obama's FCC is the one that solidified net neutrality by formally classifying internet communications

Stop playing into the BSAB narrative. It's unbecoming.
 
Re: Business, Economics & Tax Policy 5.0: Can a blind nut find a squirrel?

unofan said:
Oh for fark's sake. Obama's FCC is the one that solidified net neutrality by formally classifying internet communications

Stop playing into the BSAB narrative. It's unbecoming.
Click to expand...

I'm not playing the BSAB narrative. The GOP is a 10 on the corruption scale. The Clintons are a 7. Obama was a 2 and that makes him worthy of Rushmore. And the scale is logarithmic.

The Trumps are a 73.
 
Re: Business, Economics & Tax Policy 5.0: Can a blind nut find a squirrel?

The Trumps aren't a 73. The Trumps are the scale.
 
Re: Business, Economics & Tax Policy 5.0: Can a blind nut find a squirrel?

unofan said:
Oh for fark's sake. Obama's FCC is the one that solidified net neutrality by formally classifying internet communications

Stop playing into the BSAB narrative. It's unbecoming.
Click to expand...

Furthermore, net neutrality was the informal rule since the beginning and was working fine, so there was no major impetus to do anything until recently when people starting challenging it.
 
Re: Business, Economics & Tax Policy 5.0: Can a blind nut find a squirrel?

French Rage said:
Furthermore, net neutrality was the informal rule since the beginning and was working fine, so there was no major impetus to do anything until recently when people starting challenging it.
Click to expand...

It is in my opinion a made up issue to allow major content providers a to avoid compensating carriers for unbalanced traffic distributions. Now that their contracts are won, it can disappear with little fanfare. We may see a little half hearted protests, but nothing real. All about gov't picking Google/Netflix over carriers. An argument could be made it was the right choice.

Additionally if law enforcement has a warrant you will have no privacy with Net Neutrality or not.
 
sagard said:
It is in my opinion a made up issue to allow major content providers a to avoid compensating carriers for unbalanced traffic distributions. Now that their contracts are won, it can disappear with little fanfare. We may see a little half hearted protests, but nothing real. All about gov't picking Google/Netflix over carriers. An argument could be made it was the right choice.

Additionally if law enforcement has a warrant you will have no privacy with Net Neutrality or not.
Click to expand...

Well there it is, the stupidest thing I'll read all day...
 
sagard said:
It is in my opinion a made up issue to allow major content providers a to avoid compensating carriers for unbalanced traffic distributions. Now that their contracts are won, it can disappear with little fanfare. We may see a little half hearted protests, but nothing real. All about gov't picking Google/Netflix over carriers. An argument could be made it was the right choice.

Additionally if law enforcement has a warrant you will have no privacy with Net Neutrality or not.
Click to expand...

What you're talking about has almost nothing to do with net neutrality even if Netflix tried to convince people otherwise.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top