What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

BU 2021-22: Albie's Great Adventure

Status
Not open for further replies.
Don't disagree and unfortunately that is partially why we're in the current mess. It's time to blow up the old school, parochial thinking and get the best person for the job regardless of whether they played here or not (like most of our other sports, our classroom professors, etc around our great and inclusive university). Pecknold or Bennett or the like would immediately get us back to our past glorious levels.

I have my doubts about Bennett, who was mentioned when Albie got the job. He did very well taking over Nate Leaman's team, but not so great with his own.

If BU went outside the alumni family, it would have to be a home run hire. That could be Pecknold, like Carvel was for UMass.
 
Don't disagree and unfortunately that is partially why we're in the current mess. It's time to blow up the old school, parochial thinking and get the best person for the job regardless of whether they played here or not (like most of our other sports, our classroom professors, etc around our great and inclusive university). Pecknold or Bennett or the like would immediately get us back to our past glorious levels.

If outside BU, Bazin is the guy. But, being a bit of a traditionalist, I'd look at Shawn McEachern. My son-in-law coaches HS Prep, and he says Rivers (1) plays a 'pro game' and (2) is very difficult to play against. He's done very well at Rivers with less than top talent.
 
I have my doubts about Bennett, who was mentioned when Albie got the job. He did very well taking over Nate Leaman's team, but not so great with his own.

I have no doubt, Bennett would be a bad hire. Even with as poor as things have gone with Albie, I am glad they didn't go with Bennett last time.
 
Bazin ain't leaving Lowell. Bennett would not be an improvement over Albie. Quinn is not off the table.

Whatever happens, Year 5 of Albie cannot happen.
 
If outside BU, Bazin is the guy. But, being a bit of a traditionalist, I'd look at Shawn McEachern. My son-in-law coaches HS Prep, and he says Rivers (1) plays a 'pro game' and (2) is very difficult to play against. He's done very well at Rivers with less than top talent.
Freddy Meyer is the coach at Rivers now. I thought MacEachern went to Matignon/Boston Hockey Academy, but not too sure. Chris Dyment is coaching there as well.

I'd like to know more about Steve Greeley and Doug Friedman. Both short on head coaching experience, but they each have a somewhat broad range of experience, are available, and don't always look confused.
 
I think there are three Hockey East coaches that have made their programs, and without them, or a similar top coach, they would be decidedly second rate. Leaman, Bazin and Carvel.
Cavanaugh is okay.

Jerry is a legend, coaching at blue blood. So I don't put him on any other list.

Based on facilities, history, tradition and recruiting destination, BU is a blue blood that is severely underachieving.
 
Bazin ain't leaving Lowell. Bennett would not be an improvement over Albie. Quinn is not off the table.

Whatever happens, Year 5 of Albie cannot happen.

Your reference to Quinn. Is this speculation on your part, or do you "know something"? And yes, Year 5? No, no, no.
 
Last edited:
Freddy Meyer is the coach at Rivers now. I thought MacEachern went to Matignon/Boston Hockey Academy, but not too sure. Chris Dyment is coaching there as well.

I'd like to know more about Steve Greeley and Doug Friedman. Both short on head coaching experience, but they each have a somewhat broad range of experience, are available, and don't always look confused.

I like this.

Over the past few years, I've wondered how Albie's hiring was received by the BU hockey community; former teammates, guys he's coached with.
 
If outside BU, Bazin is the guy. But, being a bit of a traditionalist, I'd look at Shawn McEachern. My son-in-law coaches HS Prep, and he says Rivers (1) plays a 'pro game' and (2) is very difficult to play against. He's done very well at Rivers with less than top talent.

I agree that Bazin is unlikely to leave Lowell but he's still an attractive, no nonsense proven winner. If Dave Quinn were actually available, as suggested in recent posts, I'd certainly welcome him back. Keith Tkachuk has built a great development program and environment in the St. Louis area. Does anyone think he could be lured back to BU? My preference would still be to have the next coach steeped in the Terrier culture and tradition.
 
I agree that Bazin is unlikely to leave Lowell but he's still an attractive, no nonsense proven winner. If Dave Quinn were actually available, as suggested in recent posts, I'd certainly welcome him back. Keith Tkachuk has built a great development program and environment in the St. Louis area. Does anyone think he could be lured back to BU? My preference would still be to have the next coach steeped in the Terrier culture and tradition.

The only thing that tradition has brought us are good individual players that are occasionally fun to watch in losing efforts. When was the last time that a traditional recruiting advantage won the national championship versus a teams that simply had talented but older (sometimes much older) players? The NHL's inclusion of younger and at times smaller players in their rosters has only exacerbated the flaws in recruiting young NHL-bound talent.
 
We need to find the best coach available (I personally have bias against inexperienced coaches because BU should not settle for training newbies and dealing with the underperforming results that most often occur). We've invested in a beautiful arena that often goes half empty because the fans and students are voting with their feet in terms of the W-L record and lack of excitement at home games. We need a proven coach and we simply tie one hand behind our back if we require the head coach to have played for BU. Today's fans/consumers simply don't care about that as compared to previous generations.
 
Over the past few years, I've wondered how Albie's hiring was received by the BU hockey community; former teammates, guys he's coached with.

For me, I was very happy when Albie got promoted to head coach. At the time, it seemed like the most logical choice given Albie's BU lineage, his vast experience as an assistant coach at several programs, his reputation as a stellar recruiter, and the perception that he was due for this opportunity. The belief at the time was that Albie was best-positioned to sustain what Quinn had done, with players he was directly responsible for recruiting.

My recollection is that his hire was very well-received by the BU hockey community. I thought if successful, BU wouldn't have to worry about hiring a head coach for quite some time, that Albie represented continuity and stability for the program similar to what Jack Parker brought.

Yet in hindsight, it seems as if something went amiss early on during his head coaching tenure. I recall early impressions included projecting a lack of confidence when behind the bench, speaking to the media, as well as when interacting with supporters. And the team in his 1st year got off to an 0-4-1 start, which I now feel was foreshadowing of how the next 3 years would transpire.

I also recall some in the BU hockey community questioning whether Paul Pearl may have been the de-facto head coach, especially during games. Conversely, I also know some folks around the program advised patience, suggesting that Albie would grow into the role he was promoted to, and to not evaluate him based on how his 1st season transpired.

3+ years later, the growing consensus seems to be a vote of no-confidence.
 
I have a tough time believing they would bring Quinn back. BU hired Albie as a knee-jerk reaction to Quinn not being Parker and leaving after only five years. They intentionally hired a guy who had no hope of moving up to the NHL, figuring he would be at BU for a long time. So why would they go back to Quinn now? Maybe it would depend on what he says to them, if they talk to him. Maybe he'll say he had his fill of the NHL and has no interest in going back. Maybe they'll believe him and re-hire him. It just seems unlikely to me.
 
Sens must not be thrilled with BU development. Drafted Boucher 10th overall and he didnt get invited into the preliminary WJC roster
 
Sens must not be thrilled with BU development. Drafted Boucher 10th overall and he didnt get invited into the preliminary WJC roster

A few thoughts on Boucher...

* IMO, drafting him 10th overall was a bit of a reach, given he was projected as a 2nd rounder in many mock drafts.
* Boucher hasn't played consistently nor well enough, and has shown a lack of discipline with his many penalties.
* I wouldn't be shocked if Boucher leaves BU in favor of the OHL (the Ottawa 67s own his rights). If that's to occur, I'm not sure if it'd be the wisest move, but given that his dad has been vocal on Twitter about HE officiating along with potential dissatisfaction from the Sens organization about his hockey development at BU, going from the NCAA route to MJs is a distinct possibility.
 
I have a tough time believing they would bring Quinn back. BU hired Albie as a knee-jerk reaction to Quinn not being Parker and leaving after only five years. They intentionally hired a guy who had no hope of moving up to the NHL, figuring he would be at BU for a long time. So why would they go back to Quinn now? Maybe it would depend on what he says to them, if they talk to him. Maybe he'll say he had his fill of the NHL and has no interest in going back. Maybe they'll believe him and re-hire him. It just seems unlikely to me.

The notion of Quinn returning to BU is somewhere between wishful thinking and distinct possibility. My sense is that if the BU door is to reopen and there's mutual interest, his preference might be to return to BU than continue the pursuit of NHL opportunities (assistant coach or even head coach for a lesser franchise when compared to the Rangers). The Rangers owe him several million $ on the 2 remaining years of his contract; presumably there's financial stability on his part where his next hockey decision may be based on long-term fit more so than following the $.
 
This lame duck coaching situation is going to have long term ramifications if they don't figure it out soon. The poor start to the season plus the huge question of who is going to be behind the bench in upcoming seasons is going to be a negative factor for any potential recruit.
 
This lame duck coaching situation is going to have long term ramifications if they don't figure it out soon. The poor start to the season plus the huge question of who is going to be behind the bench in upcoming seasons is going to be a negative factor for any potential recruit.

The recruiting is pretty much done for several years in advance.
The question may be would any of them de-commit based on whomever is coaching.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet...1z3rdKeNcOXj-KK4cirID5rro/edit#gid=1466169803
 
The only thing that tradition has brought us are good individual players that are occasionally fun to watch in losing efforts. When was the last time that a traditional recruiting advantage won the national championship versus a teams that simply had talented but older (sometimes much older) players? The NHL's inclusion of younger and at times smaller players in their rosters has only exacerbated the flaws in recruiting young NHL-bound talent.

Regardless of who is in the head coach's chair - can anyone really envision a scenario where the BU administration would go for loading up a team with 23 year olds?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top