What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Bracketology and the PairWise Rankings II

  • Thread starter Thread starter Priceless
  • Start date Start date
Re: Bracketology and the PairWise Rankings II

I thought the tiebreakers were set? RPI being the first tiebreaker?

priceless is certainly the authority on this, but i think, technically rpi is the tie breaker, but say those teams have played head to head 3 times and the team with the lower rpi has gone 3-0-0 in those three games, they might select the team with the lower rpi...
 
Re: Bracketology and the PairWise Rankings II

UMD - Not in. 2 wins at the F5 will do it; that means they MUST win the play-in game vs North Dakota.

Not quite. Here's a way for UMD to lose the play-in game and still get in:

Code:
Hockey East Semifinal #2: Boston University defeats Maine.
Hockey East Semifinal #1: Boston College defeats Vermont.
Hockey East Championship game: Boston College defeats Boston University.
ECAC Semifinal #2: Union defeats St. Lawrence.
ECAC Semifinal #1: Cornell defeats Brown.
ECAC Championship game: Cornell defeats Union.
ECAC Consolation game: St. Lawrence defeats Brown.
Atlantic Hockey Semifinal #2: Sacred Heart defeats Air Force.
Atlantic Hockey Semifinal #1: RIT defeats Canisius.
Atlantic Hockey Championship game: Sacred Heart defeats RIT.
CCHA Semifinal #2: Ferris State defeats Northern Michigan.
CCHA Semifinal #1: Miami defeats Michigan.
CCHA Championship game: Ferris State defeats Miami.
CCHA Consolation game: Michigan defeats Northern Michigan.
WCHA Play-in #1: North Dakota defeats Minnesota-Duluth.
WCHA Semifinal #2: Wisconsin defeats St. Cloud State.
WCHA Semifinal #1: Denver defeats North Dakota.
WCHA Championship game: Denver defeats Wisconsin.
WCHA Consolation game: St. Cloud State defeats North Dakota.

Almost every game outside the WCHA tournament has to happen exactly like that though.
 
Re: Bracketology and the PairWise Rankings II

Denver - In. 1 or 2. Going to Albany, Worcester or St. Paul.
Miami - In. 1-3. Fort Wayne.
Wisconsin - In. 1-5. Probably 3. Albany or St. Paul.
Boston College - In. 4-7. Looking to be the 1 seed in Worcester.
North Dakota - In. 4-7. Can still be a 1 seed, looking like a 2.
St. Cloud - In. 4-9. Can be a 1 seed if they win the WCHA title, or win the third place game.
Bemidji State - In. 2 seed.
--
Cornell - Not in. Can get as high as 6 overall or miss the tournament completely. Looking like the 3 seed in Albany.
Ferris State - Not in. Can get as high as 6 overall or miss the tournament completely.
Yale - Not in, but very close.
UMD - Not in. 2 wins at the F5 will do it; that means they MUST win the play-in game vs North Dakota.
NMU - Not in, but can advance even with 2 losses at the Joe.
Alaska - Not in, but close. Need there to be less than 3 "autobid" winners. They are Miami, BC and Cornell fans this weekend.
Vermont - Not in, but close. Can still be a 2 seed if they win HEA.
New Hampshire - Not in, but close. More Miami, BC and Cornell fans.

Italics are teams that are no longer playing.

At least one of these bubble teams will be knocked out. UMD is my bet. Vermont is second.

Huntsville and the AHA Champion are autobids and in the field.

Everyone else is an autobid or nothing.

Has there been discussion of eliminating the consolation games? They can have such a huge impact both positive and negative and since not all leagues have them..or should all leagues have them? I remember when HE had them and I always thought it was a waste of a game - this was when the NCAA was only 12 teams so less of an impact, but seems like things should be consistent now. I'm sure it's up to each league, but they should all get together on this.
 
Re: Bracketology and the PairWise Rankings II

priceless is certainly the authority on this, but i think, technically rpi is the tie breaker, but say those teams have played head to head 3 times and the team with the lower rpi has gone 3-0-0 in those three games, they might select the team with the lower rpi...

2007. St. Lawrence, UMass, Maine. UMass had won 4 straight games over Maine AND won the comparisons over both, and was still given the 4 seed behind SLU and Maine. I remember a lot of us had that wrong, because we broke ties H2H or by comparisons, but it's straight RPI.
 
Re: Bracketology and the PairWise Rankings II

I would sure like to see NMU going to Fort Wayne. Is that an option?

Id rather see Northern in St Paul. Just got to win a game this weekend, and Northern should be a lock, unless we win the CCHA and give other bubble teams heart attacks. :D

And Ive also become a BC, Cornell, Denver/Wisconsin/St Clood fan for the weekend.
 
Last edited:
Re: Bracketology and the PairWise Rankings II

Not quite. Here's a way for UMD to lose the play-in game and still get in:

Code:
Hockey East Semifinal #2: Boston University defeats Maine.
Hockey East Semifinal #1: Boston College defeats Vermont.
Hockey East Championship game: Boston College defeats Boston University.
ECAC Semifinal #2: Union defeats St. Lawrence.
ECAC Semifinal #1: Cornell defeats Brown.
ECAC Championship game: Cornell defeats Union.
ECAC Consolation game: St. Lawrence defeats Brown.
Atlantic Hockey Semifinal #2: Sacred Heart defeats Air Force.
Atlantic Hockey Semifinal #1: RIT defeats Canisius.
Atlantic Hockey Championship game: Sacred Heart defeats RIT.
CCHA Semifinal #2: Ferris State defeats Northern Michigan.
CCHA Semifinal #1: Miami defeats Michigan.
CCHA Championship game: Ferris State defeats Miami.
CCHA Consolation game: Michigan defeats Northern Michigan.
WCHA Play-in #1: North Dakota defeats Minnesota-Duluth.
WCHA Semifinal #2: Wisconsin defeats St. Cloud State.
WCHA Semifinal #1: Denver defeats North Dakota.
WCHA Championship game: Denver defeats Wisconsin.
WCHA Consolation game: St. Cloud State defeats North Dakota.

Almost every game outside the WCHA tournament has to happen exactly like that though.

Grumble. I rewrote that section but pasted the wrong one. UMD really has to win one game at the F5, 2 to be comfortable.
 
Re: Bracketology and the PairWise Rankings II

Id rather see Northern in St Paul. Just got to win a game this weekend, and Northern should be a lock, unless we win the CCHA and give other bubble teams heart attacks. :D Anything to keep UNH out.

And Ive also become a BC, Cornell, Denver/Wisconsin/St Clood fan for the weekend.

Pretty sure if you root for BC, Cornell, and Wisconsin that UNH will be in - must be that Black Bear for life thing that has you tripped up :)
 
Re: Bracketology and the PairWise Rankings II

bracketology gives me a headache...... i'm glad UW isn't on the bubble this year because i just don't have the energy to play out all the ways they could get in... so to the boys on the team, thanks for playing hard all year and avoiding this headache that is the bubble teams.. hahaha i guess those .0002 workout shirts i the offseason worked...
 
Re: Bracketology and the PairWise Rankings II

Pretty sure if you root for BC, Cornell, and Wisconsin that UNH will be in - must be that Black Bear for life thing that has you tripped up :)

Id rather see Northern in St Paul. Just got to win a game this weekend, and Northern should be a lock, unless we win the CCHA and give other bubble teams heart attacks. :D Anything to keep UNH out.

And Ive also become a BC, Cornell, Denver/Wisconsin/St Clood fan for the weekend.

what a dufus , please by all means root for bc cornell wis st cloud , even root for bu to win it all , or for that matter uvm to win it all . they still get in ... guess i might as well root for BU.
 
Re: Bracketology and the PairWise Rankings II

Denver - In. 1 or 2. Going to Albany, Worcester or St. Paul.
Miami - In. 1-3. Fort Wayne.
Wisconsin - In. 1-5. Probably 3. Albany or St. Paul.
Boston College - In. 4-7. Looking to be the 1 seed in Worcester.
North Dakota - In. 4-7. Can still be a 1 seed, looking like a 2.
St. Cloud - In. 4-9. Can be a 1 seed if they win the WCHA title, or win the third place game.
Bemidji State - In. 2 seed.
--
Cornell - Not in. Can get as high as 6 overall or miss the tournament completely. Looking like the 3 seed in Albany.
Ferris State - Not in. Can get as high as 6 overall or miss the tournament completely.
Yale - Not in, but very close.
UMD - Not in. 2 wins at the F5 will do it; that means they MUST win the play-in game vs North Dakota.
NMU - Not in, but can advance even with 2 losses at the Joe.
Alaska - Not in, but close. Need there to be less than 3 "autobid" winners. They are Miami, BC and Cornell fans this weekend.
Vermont - Not in, but close. Can still be a 2 seed if they win HEA.
New Hampshire - Not in, but close. More Miami, BC and Cornell fans.

Italics are teams that are no longer playing.

At least one of these bubble teams will be knocked out. UMD is my bet. Vermont is second.

Huntsville and the AHA Champion are autobids and in the field.

Everyone else is an autobid or nothing.

Just wondering what scenario has BC as a 7? The worst I could get them is as a 6.
 
Re: Bracketology and the PairWise Rankings II

Has there been discussion of eliminating the consolation games? They can have such a huge impact both positive and negative and since not all leagues have them..or should all leagues have them? I remember when HE had them and I always thought it was a waste of a game - this was when the NCAA was only 12 teams so less of an impact, but seems like things should be consistent now. I'm sure it's up to each league, but they should all get together on this.

Agreed. But I think they should do away with Consolations games, rather than implement them in all the leagues.

I also like the HEs way of doing the post-season. Making the regular worth something, by eliminating the worst two teams. Wish the post season conference touraments became somewhat consistant.
 
Re: Bracketology and the PairWise Rankings II

Pretty sure if you root for BC, Cornell, and Wisconsin that UNH will be in - must be that Black Bear for life thing that has you tripped up :)

Must be :rolleyes:

I just want to see NMU make the Tourny...thats why Im cheering for no more upsets. If Northern falls on their face again in Detroit there is still a chance for them to make it, so minimal upsets across the board.

And yeah, even if UNH makes it...its not like they will win the whole thing :D
 
Re: Bracketology and the PairWise Rankings II

Has there been discussion of eliminating the consolation games? They can have such a huge impact both positive and negative and since not all leagues have them..or should all leagues have them? I remember when HE had them and I always thought it was a waste of a game - this was when the NCAA was only 12 teams so less of an impact, but seems like things should be consistent now. I'm sure it's up to each league, but they should all get together on this.

The WCHA will eliminate it next year as part of a move to a 12 team conference (or, at least that is the focus of the discussion for a "new" Final Five). The new format, still under discussion, would be two play-in's on Thu., two Semi's on Fri. and a Championship on Sat. The Final "Five" would then refer to five "games" rather than five "teams."
 
Re: Bracketology and the PairWise Rankings II

2007. St. Lawrence, UMass, Maine. UMass had won 4 straight games over Maine AND won the comparisons over both, and was still given the 4 seed behind SLU and Maine. I remember a lot of us had that wrong, because we broke ties H2H or by comparisons, but it's straight RPI.

like i said... i don't claim to be the authority... :)

do you have the final rpi for that year? all i could find was the 3/17/07 on slack.net which had the following (not sure if it is final)

STL - .5384
Massachusetts - .5328
Maine - .5306

if those are in fact, the season ending rpis, i wonder if they took liberties in seeding in this instance, as all three teams were in the field... if they were all tied for the last spot in the tournament i wonder if it would have played out differently
 
Re: Bracketology and the PairWise Rankings II

2007. St. Lawrence, UMass, Maine. UMass had won 4 straight games over Maine AND won the comparisons over both, and was still given the 4 seed behind SLU and Maine. I remember a lot of us had that wrong, because we broke ties H2H or by comparisons, but it's straight RPI.

What if it comes down to two teams tied at 14th for the last spot in the tournament?

Like would they still take team 1 if this were the case? Like to decide who gets in the tourny, not just seeding?
Team 1
PWR: t14
RPI: .5300
H2H: 0-3-0
Record: 17-17-3

Team 2
PWR: t14
RPI: .5298
H2H: 3-0-0
Record: 20-17-0
 
Re: Bracketology and the PairWise Rankings II

...
And yeah, even if UNH makes it...its not like they will win the whole thing :D

Why, you're almost a visionary! Now prove your potential power of prophecy by divining something less obvious. :D
 
Re: Bracketology and the PairWise Rankings II

On the predictor I just came up with a scenario to get Michigan State in with a 14th ranking in the pwr. RIT 15th and Alabama-Huntsville 16th.

Has anyone else been able to accomplish this?

My 1st thru 14th.

1. Denver
2. Miami
3. Wisconsin
4. North Dakota
5. Cornell
6. Boston College
7. Bemidji State
8. Vermont
9. St. Cloud State
10. Northern Michigan
11. Yale
12. Alaska
13. New Hampshire
14. Michigan State
 
Re: Bracketology and the PairWise Rankings II

Just wondering what scenario has BC as a 7? The worst I could get them is as a 6.

I also couldn't get BC below a 6, but came across a scenario where they finished 7. I don't remember exactly, but I think it was Vermont over BC, Cornell and St. Cloud winning the WCHA. That knocked them down to 7.
 
Re: Bracketology and the PairWise Rankings II

What if it comes down to two teams tied at 14th for the last spot in the tournament?

Like would they still take team 1 if this were the case? Like to decide who gets in the tourny, not just seeding?
Team 1
PWR: t14
RPI: .5300
H2H: 0-3-0
Record: 17-17-3

Team 2
PWR: t14
RPI: .5298
H2H: 3-0-0
Record: 20-17-0

Judging from the past, it would be straight RPI. Team 1 would get in.
 
Back
Top