What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

BouncyBall 2013/2014

Re: BouncyBall 2013/2014

Michigan upset by New Jersey Institute of Technology at home. NJIT is the only division 1 Independent in basketball and arguably the worst program in D1... BUT today they were able to shoot 64% from three point range, which is an equalizer for the small teams against the big boys.

Lowell has already beaten NJIT twice this season
 
Re: BouncyBall 2013/2014

A bad year for Marquette gets even worse - two players are transferring after the semester. Luckily, Luke Fischer becomes eligible next week after HIS transfer last year from Indiana.
 
Re: BouncyBall 2013/2014

Michigan upset by New Jersey Institute of Technology at home. NJIT is the only division 1 Independent in basketball and arguably the worst program in D1... BUT today they were able to shoot 64% from three point range, which is an equalizer for the small teams against the big boys.

And it's starting to happen again against Eastern Michigan.
 
Re: BouncyBall 2013/2014

Eastern Michigan 45
Michigan 42

Final.

So I went to this game last night- terrible game- not because we lost, because it was just poorly played- we left at half time when the score was 21-19. The low score was not due to great defense, but really bad shooting as EMU and Michigan had a ton of open chances. Good thing they had $5 tickets and that included watching the wormen get beat by 30.

Anyway, that's not why I'm posting.

But an observation. Looking at the Michigan sidelines- there are 8 players who were clearly back ups- some ready to go, some not so much. Then there's the 5 on the floor- so for the game, 11 players. Perahps 5 more in street clothes at the end of the bench. So call the team 16.

There were also 8 guys in suits. One being the HC. And another 6 or so guys in polo shirts.

That's a really high coach/player ratio and an even higher staff/player ratio. For the actual players, there were as many coaches + staff as players total.

I'm assuming the suit guys were coaches of some type.

What gives with all of those coaches?

It's particularly odd to me when I've been watching hockey for so long and used to seeing at most 3 coaches and two helpers- for the 20 or so players that are there. Heck, even football has way more players than coaches+ staff.

Why do they need so many people to help the team? (not to mention how poorly they play with all of that help)
 
Re: BouncyBall 2013/2014

Kobe passed MJ on the all-time scoring list tonight.

Not as big a deal as ESPN makes it out to be. They didn't rewrite the rules for Kobe.
 
Re: BouncyBall 2013/2014

But an observation. Looking at the Michigan sidelines- there are 8 players who were clearly back ups- some ready to go, some not so much. Then there's the 5 on the floor- so for the game, 11 players. Perahps 5 more in street clothes at the end of the bench. So call the team 16.

There were also 8 guys in suits. One being the HC. And another 6 or so guys in polo shirts.

That's a really high coach/player ratio and an even higher staff/player ratio. For the actual players, there were as many coaches + staff as players total.

I'm assuming the suit guys were coaches of some type.

What gives with all of those coaches?

It's particularly odd to me when I've been watching hockey for so long and used to seeing at most 3 coaches and two helpers- for the 20 or so players that are there. Heck, even football has way more players than coaches+ staff.

Why do they need so many people to help the team? (not to mention how poorly they play with all of that help)

The guys with suits are indeed coaches.

All those guys in the polos are managers. I know a couple on Michigan. Believe it or not those guys on the bench don't even make up all the managers. There's also one guy recording the game, plus about 4-6 that don't even get to sit with the team due to bench space.

They probably don't need so many during the game, but they do give a lot of specialized tasks. Two years ago my friend's job was to write the play name for the players during the timeout. At CMU they have a kid whose job is just to track the type of fouls each ref calls. Another simply tracks whether he used the correct mechanics.

I know both my friends were up until 4am in Brooklyn a couple weeks ago after the Oregon win putting together scouting film and a report that would be ready for the coaches in the morning. They also use a lot of guys for rebounding during pregame, to help during drills, and basically make everything "appear" during practice and games so the coaches can focus solely on coaching.

Honestly, I don't know why they have so many compared to other sports, but I would guess part of it is due to attrition. I know quite a few kids quit MSU/UM each year just because it's such a huge time commitment. Hockey and football are generally weekend only, with two or three distinct start times, so there's a routine that you can get into. Basketball, on the other hand, has games any day of the week during the non-conference season, with about 10-12 possible start times. Even when conference season hits the only regularity you have is that you know you won't be playing Monday or Friday, but all others are fair game. That's only Big Ten too, most other conferences still play seven days a week.
 
Re: BouncyBall 2013/2014

The guys with suits are indeed coaches.

All those guys in the polos are managers. I know a couple on Michigan. Believe it or not those guys on the bench don't even make up all the managers. There's also one guy recording the game, plus about 4-6 that don't even get to sit with the team due to bench space.

They probably don't need so many during the game, but they do give a lot of specialized tasks. Two years ago my friend's job was to write the play name for the players during the timeout. At CMU they have a kid whose job is just to track the type of fouls each ref calls. Another simply tracks whether he used the correct mechanics.

I know both my friends were up until 4am in Brooklyn a couple weeks ago after the Oregon win putting together scouting film and a report that would be ready for the coaches in the morning. They also use a lot of guys for rebounding during pregame, to help during drills, and basically make everything "appear" during practice and games so the coaches can focus solely on coaching.

Honestly, I don't know why they have so many compared to other sports, but I would guess part of it is due to attrition. I know quite a few kids quit MSU/UM each year just because it's such a huge time commitment. Hockey and football are generally weekend only, with two or three distinct start times, so there's a routine that you can get into. Basketball, on the other hand, has games any day of the week during the non-conference season, with about 10-12 possible start times. Even when conference season hits the only regularity you have is that you know you won't be playing Monday or Friday, but all others are fair game. That's only Big Ten too, most other conferences still play seven days a week.

My dad actually noticed the same thing at a smaller state school out west.

The manager ones, I'm ok with- many of them are student volunteers. Or some are work/study kids, too- and this is the (cool) job that they have to do.

I'm even ok with the volunteer coaches.

Since you have friends who may be closer- how many of the coaches are paid staff? To me, if the ratio is even close to 1 coach/ 3 players, something seems odd. More so that such a simple game needs that many coaches and it's still played very randomly.

I guess that's one place all of the athletic money is going....
 
Re: BouncyBall 2013/2014

how many of the coaches are paid staff? To me, if the ratio is even close to 1 coach/ 3 players, something seems odd.

Perhaps it depends upon whether you have a winning program or not?

The UConn men's and women's basketball teams both have a head coach, an associate head coach, and two assistant coaches on staff and have for years. The latter three work with position players on position-specific drills during practice while the head coach oversees the whole program. That hits your "1 coach / 3 players" ratio perfectly.

Part of the situation involves off-season activities (e.g., recruiting). Top-level college coaching these days is year-round, not just during season.
 
Re: BouncyBall 2013/2014

My dad actually noticed the same thing at a smaller state school out west.

The manager ones, I'm ok with- many of them are student volunteers. Or some are work/study kids, too- and this is the (cool) job that they have to do.

I'm even ok with the volunteer coaches.

Since you have friends who may be closer- how many of the coaches are paid staff? To me, if the ratio is even close to 1 coach/ 3 players, something seems odd. More so that such a simple game needs that many coaches and it's still played very randomly.

I guess that's one place all of the athletic money is going....

I'll expand a bit on what Fish said. That's not only successful programs that go with four coaches, that's all D1 programs. Even NJIT has 4 coaches. One for head coach, one for associate head coach, and two assistants. Between the three assistants, they're generally selected based on strengths. One will be good with defense, another with big men, another with guards, or some combination.

Other guys in suits on the bench include: Director of Basketball Operations (I know MSU puts him on the bench at least), one or two grad assistants, and possibly the trainer, though they may be in the classic polo and khakis.

Now, about pay: Managers aren't paid. It's against NCAA rules because you can only pay a certain number of people on your staff. They are paid during summer camps and whatnot, but cannot be compensated for anything in-season. However, they are allowed to give out some scholarships, which I believe are donor funded endowments. One of my friends got a small scholarship for being one of the head managers. It's actually a decent sized scholly, but when you stretch it out into the amount of hours put in during the year it comes out to near minimum wage, maybe even below.

So, given the 12 scholarships, plus three or four walkons to make it 16, you're looking at a 4 to 1 ratio, 3 to 1 if you include grad assistants.
 
Re: BouncyBall 2013/2014

Well, for all of the coaches that are present, and all of the apparent coaching that goes on year round... well...

Especially what is visible on court with the eleible players. 7-8 suits visible vs. 11 players.

Whereas hockey there are at most 3 guys in suits with 22 players on the bench.

The games seem to be played very equally randomly. Seems like one coach and two assistants should be all that is needed.

Thanks for the clarification.
 
Re: BouncyBall 2013/2014

The games seem to be played very equally randomly. Seems like one coach and two assistants should be all that is needed..

During games, probably; during practice, maybe; but year-round, when you also factor in recruiting? The coaching staff never has an off-season.
 
Back
Top