For my money, the 3 best Americans all tournament have been Donato, Terry and Greenway. Imagine if they actually embraced sending college kids instead of these AHLers and NHL has-beens?
The 1988! chant would probably be alive and well.
For my money, the 3 best Americans all tournament have been Donato, Terry and Greenway. Imagine if they actually embraced sending college kids instead of these AHLers and NHL has-beens?
the captain WAS 25 y.o. at the time.![]()
McCarthy is singlehandedly losing this game for the US. I can't believe I just watched him skate past the bench after being out there for like 3+ mins.
or how about terry trying to dangle through 3 defenders by himself on 2-3 instances.. team had guys open. meanwhile the czechs put on a clinic in our zone at times.
he (terry) had a good tourney; those were not his best moments.
The college kids did pretty well in 1980, if memory serves me correctly.
The 1980 team actually had more players who had completed their college careers (11), then left college early to join the team (9). Of those nine, six join the Olympic team instead of playing what would have been their senior season.the captain WAS 25 y.o. at the time.![]()
Could a team like that have been put together and been centralized for this year's Olympics?
Sean
Could a team like that have been put together and been centralized for this year's Olympics?
Sean
When you have players who have been in the "minors" (basically defined as never having been in or no longer in the NHL), they have pretty much reached their potential. Although it remains to be seen with many of these collegians how far they will get, at least their potential upside would seemingly be higher than people you know are never going to get to that level. It just seemed obvious to me that too many players on the roster lacked top-level skills. It may very well be that the US does not have the depth that we may feel it does. So given that all the "best" players are already in the NHL, the question becomes is is riskier to take an "unproven" college kid or go with the "at least you know what you're going to get" choice? I imagine that will be debated in the near future.
But the problem is the fact that these players are leaving at a younger age for the NHL. Imagine this team with Eichel, McAvoy and others of that ilk. Twenty years ago they would still likely be in college (as you can see from the list above, almost ALL of those players - even though they left 'early' - stayed at least three years, which is a lot more than one!).
So, realistically, I don't know how you CAN assemble a team such as that, unless it would be comprised of "lesser" talented players who are still in college. And that's the point - you're not choosing between a top ten draft choice and a career minor leaguer - you're choosing between a "possible" NHL player and a career minor leaguer - because all the "can't miss" players are already in the NHL.
Put another way, just look at the BU players on that 1980 team. ALL of them would have been in the NHL if that era were today, so none of them could have been on the Olympic team.
I think you are over-glorifying the 1980 players. Most of them were not particularly great players. They all had great college careers and most never amounted to much at the NHL level. In fact, a lot of those players had comparable NHL careers to the guys who played for us at the Olympics this year - the difference being these guys had their NHL careers prior to these Olympics, rather than after, like the 1980'ers.
I just saw a tweet from the University of Denver that Troy Terry is a "game time decision" for this weekends games. Be interested to see if we get a similar post/tweet on Jordan Greenway.
Billy Jaffe tweeted that Greenway will be in the lineup on Friday.
It certainly could have been and it was something I was hoping would have happened. They do it for the women's team, no reason they couldn't have done it for the men's. It is something I imagine would have happened for 2022 if it wasn't for the fact that NHL players will most likely be back in the Olympics.
That was the norm prior to inclusion of the NHL in 1998. I think if the NHL had decided earlier that it would back out of this year's Games, USA Hockey may have had the opportunity to hold a centralized camp to select the team. I think if that had occurred, more college players may have been given stronger consideration.
Hypothetically speaking, if the NHL had made its decision before the end of 2016 that it would not allow its players to participate in this Olympics, it could have significantly impacted early college departures as well as signing of ELCs from Seniors following last season. It would've opened the doors for players like Keller, McAvoy, Boeser, Butcher, Bjork, Colin White, Cal Petersen and others...
I imagine it'd be similar. If he got a nonstop flight, it's still ~14 hours from South Korea to Boston, not to mention the major time zone adjustment and him coming off multiple games this week. Perhaps we see him for Saturday's game. I imagine Harper's status would impact that decision a bit as well.
Dude can sleep in the plane. Mookie is lights out before wheels up. Never fails
![]()
Are you 6'5?![]()
Are you 6'5?![]()