I had absolutely no idea until I did some digging, but I did find it:What are the circumstances that Agnew does not have to sit out a year on the transfer?
how about an all Canada line: LA, 9 and 7
or a super line of LA, 19 and 9 with 4 and 10 on D
hopefully that would get the blessing of the high end coach
can't wait for next year already.
Newkirk, Lonergan, and Connolly are the centers, barring someone switching positions. But I agree with Riot, I'd really like to see LA with #9. And Beres can definitely do some damage with one of the big boppers.Where does #11 fit into the mix?...
That is an overloaded lineup.
What are the circumstances that Agnew does not have to sit out a year on the transfer?
I believe NCAA D1 women (and most women's sports in general) are exempt from the transfer rules that men must follow.
Interesting. Makes a person wonder why there isn't more transferring on the women's side of things. Kepler had to sit a year when she transferred to UW from OSU, but I think that might just be a b10 thing.
Within the WCHA a transferring student athlete does have to sit out one year, but which other conference mandates the same?It's a WCHA thing, and the other conferences have similar rules.
I wouldn't take any trade, they're Eagles for good!Teams could actually "trade" players then too out of conference. TT3, what do you want for Watt?
I wouldn't take any trade, they're Eagles for good!
If Watts played in the WCHA, she would have half the points. Excellent player however Zumwinkle and Maltais are as skilled, were 1-2 in scoring I believe with half the points.
I wouldn't take any trade, they're Eagles for good!
you can't deny that UW's staff has a way better eye for goalie talent than most, and probably better coaching as well.
If Watts played in the WCHA, she would have half the points. Excellent player however Zumwinkle and Maltais are as skilled, were 1-2 in scoring I believe with half the points.
More than that until the good part. Here is the schedule from a BC perspective as I see it:6 months to go...
Yep. Pretty much spot on lolMore than that until the good part. Here is the schedule from a BC perspective as I see it:
April-August - players train and improve;
September - school begins; players back on ice; others learn a lot from returning Olympians;
October - BC crushes a young UMD team and several HEA foes by using the strategy of never letting them possess the puck;
November - Grant tries to contain his giddiness while watching the Eagles blow out everyone in sight;
December - Grant puts together mid-season highlight videos, researches scoring records that will be broken, and attempts to devise a new ranking system that fully captures BC's brilliance;
January - Grant no longer attempts to contain his giddiness and spends most of his days giggling in anticipation;
February - Everyone (not just Grant) has decided that BC earning the title is just a formality;
early March - Grant covets an NCAA quarterfinal matchup versus RIT;
the Frozen Four - for the first time all season, the Eagles discover that the puck is somewhere other than on their sticks or in the opponent's net (what happens next is really the only part of the story that we don't already know).
As my old friend Benjamin used to say, "Honesty is the best policy".Yep. Pretty much spot on lol