Re: Boston College: It's Trophy Time
It is a really interesting team - I always find it interesting to compare and contrast to previous BC teams. They are always different. This team just finds ways to win and they have a good amount of depth. 4 losses at this point in time is impressive and yet they don't seem to be blowing the socks off of most teams most nights. They manage to grind out wins and turn bad performances into ties rather than losses. A lot of the old juggernaut teams used to underachieve in the RS and while it was apparent they should obliterate the competition they never did that too often and then finally got on their postseason runs. This team is so different.
I looked back as far as I could on HE Online and compared number of losses as of Feb 23rd to other teams. Only 2004 was better, at this point in the season that team had only 3 losses. 2014 was on par with this one, posting only 4 losses up to this point. The last two national champs at BC each had 10 losses as of 2/23. Average number of losses by this date going back to 1998-1999 is 8.
These guys seem to quietly be going about their business. You could make an argument they would be killing teams if they stopped with their penalties.
It used to pizz me off big time when Gionta's team's would lose at Merrimack in Jan. or Feb.

Hell, the 2001 NC team got thumped 6-3 at the Mac in January and that nearly put me over the edge.

But they finally got over the hump in April that year.
The only recent BC teams I feel had the depth to compete with those Gionta teams were the 2010 and 2011 teams, but I think each of those teams lacked in top end depth on the blue line. This 2016 team has high end depth across the board and would give the 1998-2001 Eagles a run for their money, IMO. I've mentioned to sterlippo a few times this season, as early as October, that this team is as good a team that I have ever seen here at BC since becoming a STH in '97. I still believe that.
Of the 4 losses to date, I witnessed all but one, and in those 3 losses, we were the better team IMO (I can't comment on the RPI loss as I wasn't there). Love the way they fight back after giving up a lead. Love the way they respond after a loss.
The Notre Dame loss in December, only 9 forwards saw action. Tuch, Wood and Calnan were watching from the stands. We gave up 2 late goals and coughed up a 2 goal lead in the third and lost 4-3. This with one complete line of key players missing. We ate ND's lunch at ND, 4-0, in the rematch a few weeks ago with an almost full lineup (Calnan out).
We handed PC the game in FL and we responded the following Friday by eating their lunch, 7-3.
Ohio St. . . I commented after that game and have since erased it from my memory bank.
That all being said, this team has yet to accomplish anything of meaning except for a Beanpot. Trophy season is here. What will be their legacy? A nice start would be to clinch home ice and at least a share of the Hockey East Regular Season title on Friday. Lets's see how they respond. If they are what I think they are, they will rise to the occasion.
Go Eagles!