Re: Book Thread number ?
Did you enjoy it? It is one of my never going to get tossed books. I liked Sam Damon's leadership vs. the idiots.
You may not like my assessment, because I am a bitter cynic and I think there is some validity to Gen. Scales' criticisms, but hear me out...
Sam is kind of a Gary Stu. You know the trope - he was so
special as a teen and felt he had a destiny, so he went way above his pay grade and miraculously talked his way into a shot at West Point, and of course he aced his exams because he's so
special, but then he was deferred, and he just knew he was too
special to wait. So he joined the Army and ascended, and proved how
special he was by earning the MoH while still alive. Then WWI ended, and he was so
special and humble that he took a demotion rather than enter private life, and so on, and so forth.
Can you tell how much I despise this almost angelic character trope? Call me jealous if you must, but no human is this perfect; not even close.
However, at the end of the day, Sam's leadership is the leadership we should all aspire to. Sam is a go-getter who asserts himself, and fights on the front lines, and serves as the role-model for his units. He knows when a violent conflict is unjust. He doesn't just unzip and throw his dick out there. I do think the story unnecessarily exaggerates military politics to vilify ROTC/service academy graduates like Massengale, but then I guess it wouldn't be so emotionally gripping, would it?
At the end of the day, I went in expecting a pièce de résistance on imperfect leadership, but I left with a hamfisted treatise on good and evil, and feeling that I didn't learn much that I did not already know. To compare to the corporate world, I think Damon's style works best until about the time you hit the VP level, where you just can't be involved in day-to-day affairs anymore. I witnessed it happen in a former boss, who quickly ascended from team lead to manager to director to VP. You reach a point where there is so much going on within your purview, that you no longer have much time for individual interaction with the employees "down in the trenches". Of course, there are certainly some execs who rise to the top by kissing arse and acting like Massengale, thinking their resources are stupid and expendable because of their credentials and "executive-ness". However, there are many others who "get it", but simply don't have the time or skills to address it.
I don't think it's a bad book to teach at our service academies, but it should be taught with caution and nuance. There is a balance to be found among our military leadership between field command and back office knowledge.