What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Biden v Dump 1: If not now, when? If not us, who?

Status
Not open for further replies.
The polls gauge the popular vote.

Therefore, the polls were right.

Christ, you're incredibly stupid. Do you have to remind yourself to breathe?

Now, why don't you run along and swindle some poor old widow out of her life's savings.
 
French Rage said:
It's all speculative guys. That's why the IRS has had an audit going on it for an entire decade. It all makes perfect sense when you think of it that way.
Click to expand...

Good point, It's not as if the IRS targeted conservatives during the Obama admin. Oh, wait ...

https://www.npr.org/2017/10/27/56030...rvative-groups

Yes, straight from that Deep Red organization known as NPR ... <<ROFLMAO emoji>>

The controversy began in 2013 when an IRS official admitted the agency had been aggressively scrutinizing groups with names such as "Tea Party" and "Patriots." It later emerged that liberal groups had been targeted, too, although in smaller numbers. The IRS stepped up its scrutiny around 2010, as applications for tax-exempt status surged. Tea Party groups were organizing, and court decisions had eased the rules for tax-exempt groups to participate in politics.

After the IRS confession in 2013, its top echelons were quickly cleaned out. Conservative groups sued. Congressional Republicans launched what became years of hearings, amid allegations the Obama White House had ordered the targeting.

This should not be shocking, but chances of being audited increase dramatically if you're rich:

https://www.cheatsheet.com/money-car...udit-you.html/

Middle-income taxpayers are rarely audited, according to IRS data. Of all tax returns filed in 2014, the IRS did not examine over 99% of those with incomes between $25,000 and $200,000. Once your income crosses the $200,000 mark, your audit risk steadily climbs. About 1.5% of taxpayers who made between $200,000 and $500,000 were audited, along with 8.42% of those earning between $1 million and $5 million. Among the lucky few who earned more than $10 million a year, the IRS audited 35%.
 
I assume at some point our resident Trumpers will talk about the Project Veritas video about supposed voter fraud here in Minnesota...Moscow has it all over Twitter right now with tweets getting flagged already.
 
Deutsche Gopher Fan said:
Brad par scale isn’t having a good night.

police have him in hospital after he barricaded himself in his house, armed, and threatened to kill him self
Click to expand...

Here is Why

The Campaign Legal Center, a nonpartisan campaign finance watchdog group, filed a complaint with the Federal Elections Commission Tuesday accusing the Trump campaign of “laundering” $170 million through numerous companies, some with connections to former Trump campaign manager Brad Parscale.
Click to expand...

Nazis are all cowards...

“The Trump campaign and Trump Make America Great Again Committee disguised nearly $170 million of campaign spending by laundering the funds through firms,” the complaint claims.

It adds that the firms are “headed by Trump’s recent campaign manager, Brad Parscale, and/or created by Trump campaign lawyers.”

The complaint alleges that the Trump campaign paid millions of dollars to campaign-connected vendors without reporting those payments to the FEC, specifically honing in on American Made Media Consultants (AMMC), a firm created by Parscale, which has been paid over $106 million, making it the campaigns largest vendor.

AMMC was ostensibly created to circumvent media buyers, but the complaint points to FCC records that show the campaign has used media buying firm Harris Sikes to place some of its ads, alleging the campaign is “failing to report payments to the firms and is instead using AMMC as a conduit for its payments to the firms.”

The complaint also points to an app called Phunware, which Parscale has said was created and is “directly owned” by the campaign, but which has never appeared in the campaign’s spending reports because, as the complaint alleges, it was paid through AMMC.
Click to expand...

edit: here is Forbes tweet https://twitter.com/WaverlyHudson/status/1310407235831508993
 
Last edited:
*******https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/988382060443250689/DijesdNB_bigger.jpg********
MSNBC

@MSNBC
Biden campaign on President Trump's attempts to make up a drug test policy for the upcoming presidential debate: Joe Biden "intends to deliver his debate answers in words. If the president thinks his best case is made in urine he can have at it." (1/2)

"We’d expect nothing less from Donald Trump, who pissed away the chance to protect the lives of 200K Americans when he didn't make a plan to stop COVID-19." (2/2)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top