HarleyMC
Registered User
Re: B1G Hockey: The Countdown Begins
I agree, there's a burgeoning hockey market in Neb., and if there's a cash crop I would think UNL will take a good hard look at a D1 hockey program for BTHC. BTN CEO Mark Silverman is currently setting in motion plans to recruit at least 60 million more subscribers over the next five years. Notably, the announcement of the BTHC plays a significant role in this futuristic financial blueprint. Currently, the BTN yields $.88/household in subscriber fees. If the BTN raises carriage rates by a negligible $.05/household, an additional 60M subscribers in the U.S. and Canada could conservatively generate an additional $55.8M, and that’s not even considering advertising revenue.
Ad revenue could generate as much as $83.7M for a substantive albeit conservative increase in BTN revenue of $139.5M. In addition to current income, the BTN could over the next five years realistically generate substantially more than a quarter of a billion dollars for the Big Ten conference. That would more than double aggregate revenue distribution to member schools.
That would be cool. It's only a matter of time for Nebraska IMO.
I agree, there's a burgeoning hockey market in Neb., and if there's a cash crop I would think UNL will take a good hard look at a D1 hockey program for BTHC. BTN CEO Mark Silverman is currently setting in motion plans to recruit at least 60 million more subscribers over the next five years. Notably, the announcement of the BTHC plays a significant role in this futuristic financial blueprint. Currently, the BTN yields $.88/household in subscriber fees. If the BTN raises carriage rates by a negligible $.05/household, an additional 60M subscribers in the U.S. and Canada could conservatively generate an additional $55.8M, and that’s not even considering advertising revenue.
Ad revenue could generate as much as $83.7M for a substantive albeit conservative increase in BTN revenue of $139.5M. In addition to current income, the BTN could over the next five years realistically generate substantially more than a quarter of a billion dollars for the Big Ten conference. That would more than double aggregate revenue distribution to member schools.