What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

AOC Rules!

Re: AOC Rules!

scoobydoo said:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">spending a few hours today doing calltime.<br><br>but instead of calling donors, i’m calling constituents to personally follow up on casework they’ve brought to our office, and give them progress updates myself.<br><br>getting big money out of politics means your reps can do more of this.</p>— alexandria ocasio-cortez (@aoc) <a href="https://twitter.com/aoc/status/1101573021020631041?ref_src=twsrc%5etfw">march 1, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Click to expand...

just like stalin!!1!!
 
Re: AOC Rules!

rufus said:
The more I'm seeing of the way she operates, the way she approaches her job, the more I'm liking her.


Need about 100 more of her in Washington. And then maybe might get 100 more the next term, and the term after that. Then maybe, we can cut this cancer out of our government.
Click to expand...

Agreed 100%.
 
Re: AOC Rules!

ScoobyDoo said:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Cool cool - this is fine, totally acceptable and normal rhetoric; legitimized by the presence of members of Congress and the President. 👍🏽<br><br>Let me guess: no apology is necessary here, because they’ve simply been “misunderstood.” <a href="https://t.co/5WSo7aELR9">https://t.co/5WSo7aELR9</a></p>— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) <a href="https://twitter.com/AOC/status/1103026734751014913?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 5, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Click to expand...

Just like Jesus...
 
Re: AOC Rules!

The Sicatoka said:
She seems to have learned the DC game quickly.



https://www.syracuse.com/politics/2...accused-of-funneling-1m-in-fec-complaint.html
Click to expand...

I heard about that story. One of the many Trumpers who I happen to be "friends" with on facebook was whining today that it's not getting covered. I hope she didn't know anything about it, but we'll see.

I fail to see how this is somehow worse than using catch and release on a porn star you banged while you're wife was pregnant during a Presidential campaign. But, whatever.
 
Re: AOC Rules!

dxmnkd316 said:
Listed Source 1: Washington Examiner
Listed Source 2: Fox News
Listed Source 3: Breitbart


lol
Click to expand...

If you're going to shoot the messenger: the complaint was filed by the conservative National Legal and Policy Center, a government watchdog group.

If it's baseless the FEC will have it in the dumpster before the ink is dry.
 
Re: AOC Rules!

The Sicatoka said:
If you're going to shoot the messenger: the complaint was filed by the conservative National Legal and Policy Center, a government watchdog group.

If it's baseless the FEC will have it in the dumpster before the ink is dry.
Click to expand...

From the article:

Fox News noted that large transfers from PACs to LLCs are not necessarily a violation of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, but the complaint seeks details on Ocasio-Cortez’s campaign expenses. The NLPC admits the funds were likely used for campaign events, but wants the FEC to confirm there was no wrongdoing with an immediate investigation.
Click to expand...

Nice work virtue signalling though.
 
The Sicatoka said:
If you're going to shoot the messenger: the complaint was filed by the conservative National Legal and Policy Center, a government watchdog group.

If it's baseless the FEC will have it in the dumpster before the ink is dry.
Click to expand...
Source 4: "conservative" watchdog group.
 
Re: AOC Rules!

SJHovey said:
So, is "virtue signaling" the new buzz phrase around here? It seems to be showing up quite a bit recently.
Click to expand...

For him...yes. According to him any time anyone says anything with the hopes of getting someone's attention that is virtue signalling. He didnt even read the article he posted (as evidenced by the fact that the article has the "watchdog group" basically saying it may not have happened) and posted the headline to get a reaction. By his lame definition that is virtue signalling.

For anyone else I would just say they were lazy but since he had to pretend to be an expert he gets poked a bit more :D
 
Re: AOC Rules!

Handyman said:
For him...yes. According to him any time anyone says anything with the hopes of getting someone's attention that is virtue signalling. He didnt even read the article he posted (as evidenced by the fact that the article has the "watchdog group" basically saying it may not have happened) and posted the headline to get a reaction. By his lame definition that is virtue signalling.

For anyone else I would just say they were lazy but since he had to pretend to be an expert he gets poked a bit more :D
Click to expand...

So every time I *sigh* I'm virtue signalling?

Awesome.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top