rufus
rock and roller
It a judge determines someone is a threat to themselves or others it shouldn’t matter how much money they have or don’t have, they should lose their guns.
The question now, as it was then, and as you continually attempt to wriggle around as if you don't understand the question, isn't a matter of whether they have money or not. It's whether their mental faculties are such that they are unable to manage what money they do have: forget to pay their bills, are taken advantage of by scammers or unethical family members, no longer remember where they might have accounts, etc.
You were firmly of the opinion that such a mental state should not deprive them of their 2A rights to own a weapon of destruction. And implying that it did was some sort of discrimination.
Just own the fact that you're an idiot.