For instance, she interpreted the Venus De Milo’s armlessness as implying that women can’t lift heavy objects. When Adams got backlash from readers who saw Tina as an unfair caricature of feminists, he patiently explained to these hysterical females that she was never intended that way, and was just meant to be a funny character who takes everything too personally, thus successfully implying that any feminist who objected to Tina’s portrayal were, like her, overreacting to harmless statements. How convenient that this character, who was not at all meant as a personal attack on feminist, nonetheless exemplifies the worst stereotypes that anti-feminists believe about feminists. She is even portrayed as imagining that society is more sexist than it is:
Tina: Alice, one day I hope we can be judged by our accomplishments and not our gender.
Alice: I got my fourth patent today. I’m on my way to a banquet in my honor.
Tina: And you wore that?
(Dilbert strip, March 18, 1998)
The contrast between Tina and Alice is really interesting to me. Tina is attempting to bond with Alice on their common experiences of sexism, while Alice denies that she experiences such sexism, and Tina responds with a disparaging remark about Alice’s appearance. Regardless of Scott Adams’s intentions regarding these characters, they still conform to a lot of sexist beliefs about women in general: that their complaints about sexism are just a bid for attention, that they are catty and superficial, that the few who achieve great professional success prove that the many who do not are facing no major barriers. Never mind that despite having proven herself far more competent than her fellow engineers, she’s still underpaid, under-recognized, and faces sexual harassment regularly. Moreover, Alice overcomes her interpersonal difficulties using violence and aggression, thus transgressing traditional feminine social roles. Tina isn’t just female, she’s feminine, and her stereotypically feminine behavior is the punchline of a joke where the setup is her complaining about being judged for her gender.
It’s funny, but it’s especially funny to anti-feminists and misogynists, because it seems to confirm their beliefs about women and feminism. To many men, a cis man like Scott Adams is a more credible authority on typical female behavior and experience than any feminist, and that’s a manifestation of misogyny: trusting men more than women, even about women’s issues.