What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Against the rules are just being a homer ?

gfan

Registered User
Was at a game this weekend and whenever the Visitor's penalty was over (the Home team's power play), the PA announcer announced 'Teams are now back at full strength' precisely as the penalty expired. He did not make the same annoucement when the Home team penalty was over.

Against the rules or just being a classic homer ?
 
Last edited:
Re: Against the rules or just being a homer ?

Re: Against the rules or just being a homer ?

Was at a game this weekend and whenever the Visitor's penalty was over (the Home team's power play), the PA announcer announced 'Teams are now back at full strength' precisely as the penalty expired. He did NOT make the same annoucement when the Home team penalty was over.

Against the rules or just being a classic homer ?

What rules?
 
Re: Against the rules or just being a homer ?

Re: Against the rules or just being a homer ?

Was at a game this weekend and whenever the Visitor's penalty was over (the Home team's power play), the PA announcer announced 'Teams are now back at full strength' precisely as the penalty expired. He did NOT make the same annoucement when the Home team penalty was over.

Against the rules or just being a classic homer ?

If an NCAA tournament game, that would be against the rules.
 
Re: Against the rules or just being a homer ?

Re: Against the rules or just being a homer ?

Was at a game this weekend and whenever the Visitor's penalty was over (the Home team's power play), the PA announcer announced 'Teams are now back at full strength' precisely as the penalty expired. He did NOT make the same annoucement when the Home team penalty was over.

Against the rules or just being a classic homer ?

Being a homer, but as Jerry said, being a homer is against the rules in NCAA tournament play. Ask NU's former PA guy...
 
Re: Against the rules or just being a homer ?

Re: Against the rules or just being a homer ?

Being a homer, but as Jerry said, being a homer is against the rules in NCAA tournament play. Ask NU's former PA guy...

I just heard this story a couple days ago. My God, what a fiasco!

(But at the same time, as an outsider at the time of the event, HILARIOUS!)
 
Re: Against the rules or just being a homer ?

Re: Against the rules or just being a homer ?

Being a homer, but as Jerry said, being a homer is against the rules in NCAA tournament play. Ask NU's former PA guy...

Yeah, what a bonehead that guy was.
 
Re: Against the rules or just being a homer ?

Re: Against the rules or just being a homer ?

Being a homer, but as Jerry said, being a homer is against the rules in NCAA tournament play. Ask NU's former PA guy...

For those of us that are ignorant to this... care to share the story?
 
Re: Against the rules or just being a homer ?

Re: Against the rules or just being a homer ?

I just heard this story a couple days ago. My God, what a fiasco!

(But at the same time, as an outsider at the time of the event, HILARIOUS!)
Are you referring to the 2004 NCAA tournament game against Midd when the Norwich PA guy announced the Midd Womens team names when the the Mens team starters were introduced? I didn't think it was PA guy masterminding it.
 
Are you referring to the 2004 NCAA tournament game against Midd when the Norwich PA guy announced the Midd Womens team names when the the Mens team starters were introduced? I didn't think it was PA guy masterminding it.

Yes. Who do u think did mastermind it?
 
Re: Against the rules are just being a homer ?

I have no first hand knowledge, but I heard it was someone else that put him up to it. It was alleged to have been an honest mistake, but I don't see how it could have been. It wasn't very classy and hardly hilarious. I was told at the time that it was fortunate that the Midd starters knew enough not to go out when the incorrect names were introduced because they could have been assessed a protocol penalty.
 
I have no first hand knowledge, but I heard it was someone else that put him up to it. It was alleged to have been an honest mistake, but I don't see how it could have been. It wasn't very classy and hardly hilarious. I was told at the time that it was fortunate that the Midd starters knew enough not to go out when the incorrect names were introduced because they could have been assessed a protocol penalty.

That's why i said as an outsider without a horse in the race. If i was a part of either institution at the time it'd be a different story.
 
Re: Against the rules are just being a homer ?

That's why i said as an outsider without a horse in the race. If i was a part of either institution at the time it'd be a different story.
Yeah, at the time, I imagined the players participating in the biggest game of their lives at the time and hoping to have their names and hometowns introduced in front of a full house. Instead, someone decided to take that away from them and announce them as the women's teams starters. Crazy?
 
Re: Against the rules are just being a homer ?

Yeah, at the time, I imagined the players participating in the biggest game of their lives at the time and hoping to have their names and hometowns introduced in front of a full house. Instead, someone decided to take that away from them and announce them as the women's teams starters. Crazy?

I see your point. But if anything, I'm sure Middlebury was even more p/oed and ready to beat Norwich after the introductions.

It was unfortunate it happened, but you can't tell me that if that story made it into the national headlines, people wouldn't be laughing about it.
 
Re: Against the rules are just being a homer ?

I have no first hand knowledge, but I heard it was someone else that put him up to it. It was alleged to have been an honest mistake, but I don't see how it could have been. It wasn't very classy and hardly hilarious. I was told at the time that it was fortunate that the Midd starters knew enough not to go out when the incorrect names were introduced because they could have been assessed a protocol penalty.

I wasn't sorry to see him replaced. He acted like he was the show. Introduced himself to the crowd and actually walked along the ledge in front of the Press box as he made his announcements. I will give him credit for one thing - he was the one who first introduced the He Shoots ... (Crowd response...He Scores) routine to NU Hockey.
 
Re: Against the rules are just being a homer ?

I wasn't sorry to see him replaced. He acted like he was the show. Introduced himself to the crowd and actually walked along the ledge in front of the Press box as he made his announcements. I will give him credit for one thing - he was the one who first introduced the He Shoots ... (Crowd response...He Scores) routine to NU Hockey.

The announcer certainly shouldn't make himself the show but excitement and motivational speaking are absolute pluses to the job. The best D-III college PA announcer I've heard was RIT's back in their final few years of D-III. It was a kid I'm pretty sure and he was phenomenal at it. I'd have to call on Lerch, Ed, Biggar or one of those guys to see if they could pin point his name but he was great. His voice was perfect and he made the game into an event of sorts with the way he described things and read introductions.
 
Re: Against the rules are just being a homer ?

I see your point. But if anything, I'm sure Middlebury was even more p/oed and ready to beat Norwich after the introductions.

It was unfortunate it happened, but you can't tell me that if that story made it into the national headlines, people wouldn't be laughing about it.
I,m not so sure they were ready to go out and beat Norwich since they went down 2-0 after thefirst period. As far as people laughing about it, I think they would be at least scratching their head and possibly offended that a moron that couldn't figure out he was introducing female names at the NCAA Mens Championship could be hired by the host team to do the PA announcements.
 
Re: Against the rules are just being a homer ?

I,m not so sure they were ready to go out and beat Norwich since they went down 2-0 after thefirst period. As far as people laughing about it, I think they would be at least scratching their head and possibly offended that a moron that couldn't figure out he was introducing female names at the NCAA Mens Championship could be hired by the host team to do the PA announcements.

Sounds like the same "morons" (your words) who printed the "congradulations" banner.
 
Re: Against the rules are just being a homer ?

Sounds like the same "morons" (your words) who printed the "congradulations" banner.
Yeah, you're right, but that was an error of omission not commission as was the case with the PA guy and his collaborators. But the latter never got bandied about because no one does the "cover up" quite as well as Norwich. Consider the drug dealing defenseman and the hockey house brawls with police featuring Keith Aucoin's younger brother. Never discussed by USCHO? Is that drug dealer still in prison?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top