Re: Against the rules are just being a homer ?
Points in fact, not a defenseman, and no prison, and while I can condemn the error in judgement with what happened, I consider him, and wife, to be friends still.
(and I think I understand why this discussion is going on)
Yeah, you're right, but that was an error of omission not commission as was the case with the PA guy and his collaborators. But the latter never got bandied about because no one does the "cover up" quite as well as Norwich. Consider the drug dealing defenseman and the hockey house brawls with police featuring Keith Aucoin's younger brother. Never discussed by USCHO? Is that drug dealer still in prison?
Points in fact, not a defenseman, and no prison, and while I can condemn the error in judgement with what happened, I consider him, and wife, to be friends still.
(and I think I understand why this discussion is going on)
Last edited: